Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, 

Currently running a Gen 2 3582r .82 on my 33 GTR  

on e85 with all supporting mods. Making around 400awkw but it’s basically dog shit under 4800rpm. 
 

Considering I’m looking at 400awkw Max would a Gen 2 3076 with a 1.06 be more suitable or would it be as laggy and better to go to a 0.82 as well. 
 

Cheers

Edited by mrpav

Yeah open scroll. It seems to be on par with when similar setups are making the power. 
it makes 20 psi at 4800 for reference. 
full 3.5”, standard head, even if it had type b’s thst would only shift the power band in the wrong direction for me. 
 

I am beginning to think the Gen 2 3076 would of been on the money for 400kw and under

Edited by mrpav

Convert to twin scroll, also I would go GTX3576R Gen 2 over the GTX3076R Gen 2.

FWIW I was running a GTX3576R Gen 2, twin scroll albeit with a 1.01 rear housing and it was all in by 4300rpm~4400rpm with a smaller 2.5L motor at 2bar of boost (29psi).

GT3582 vs GTX3582 Gen 1 and 2 would be very different in response, considering they flow much more air.

A GT3582R is rated to about 600hp, a GTX3582R Gen 1 to about 750hp and Gen 2 at 850hp. I know the numbers Garrett advertise are a bit over the top, but you get the general theme.

A GTX3071 Gen 2 would hypothetically flow as much as a GT3582 to put things into perspective. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...