Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Turbosmart themselves say specifically not to do this in their instructions:

OPR Instructions 2017.03.20.pdf

CAUTION!

Do not place the OPR return together with the turbo drain line as this will interfere with the function of the turbo drain and may cause issues with the turbocharger oil system.

Sorry but there's no way I would compromise the turbo drain capacity to limit pressure to the oil feed, as that to me is a completely counter-intuitive solution. Sharing lines can create a problem that didn't exist before. People have been running turbos forever without oil regs and a lot do not have problems.

Since the sump is getting modded now provisions will be made for extra fittings on it if I decide its required though, as a reg bypass would be direct to sump separately.

  • Like 1
On 10/03/2022 at 10:29 AM, BK said:

Well since my blue 32 with the 2.8 is doing 460kw on 98 at 22psi and 610kw on E85 at 32psi with the 6466, I would expect on the 2.6 with the 6266 to do about 400kw on 98 and up to 500kw on E85 at similar boost levels. Definitely won't have the top end of the 6466 but would expect at least 130mph on the 1/4.

 

Nice, should be an awesome setup.  Be a great back to back comparison with you other car to decide what is more fun?  A 2.8 with bigger turbo and top end or a more responsive rev monster smaller turbo, smaller engine.

 

This is the main reason I don't run braided drains. I use a 3/4" / 19mm hardpipe barb drain fitting on turbo and into block on the front a 3/4bsp barb fitting return, as its still bigger than even an AN12 male fitting inside. A 3/4 barb fitting is at least 17mm ID, which ends up being the smallest part of the oil drain setup. Doesn't look as cool but it definitely works.

 

Have you got some decent pics of your turbo drain Ben?  I've just got my 19mm tube yesterday that I'm going to use as my turbo drain.  I'll have a Aeroflow flex pipe at the top into the 19mm stainless pipe for the lower half.  Hopefully the flex pipe is big enough as it's AN10 fittings.

Top half-Aeroflow Flexible Turbo Drain Hose Female 2 x -10an 200mm Long Sparesbox - Image 1

On 10/03/2022 at 2:41 PM, Duncan said:

dammit, turns out I had the same problem with a replacement indicator on mine too. Looks like I need to talk to Just Jap

Get in quick if you want a non Nismo heritage genuine Nissan one with the wiring, as they only have a handful left and aren't completely stupid money.

Even comes with globes, new guard corner screw and plastic captive guard thread.

On 10/03/2022 at 2:40 PM, Shoota_77 said:

 

I have to take a pic of the blue 32 oil drain but it's nothing special really, just decently sized hose and fittings. If your flex pipe thingy has AN10, I wouldn't use it myself. Go measure up the inside of all the pipes report the smallest size - if any of it is under 15mm at any point I would be concerned. The male flare holes are generally always the choke point. Can you get AN12 flex pipe ? I can't see one. Even the Platinum trick looking drainpipe kit is AN10 !

Got me fked why it's nearly all AN10 with most of this turbo oil drain stuff, as that's bloody smaller than the factory 3/4bsp to barb fitting on the front turbo block oil return.

Try find AN12 stuff, as there is definitely 3/4bsp to AN12 male fittings available for the block and 51mm flange to male AN12 turbo drain fittings out there.

On 10/3/2022 at 5:06 PM, BK said:

I have to take a pic of the blue 32 oil drain but it's nothing special really, just decently sized hose and fittings. If your flex pipe thingy has AN10, I wouldn't use it myself. Go measure up the inside of all the pipes report the smallest size - if any of it is under 15mm at any point I would be concerned. The male flare holes are generally always the choke point. Can you get AN12 flex pipe ? I can't see one. Even the Platinum trick looking drainpipe kit is AN10 !

Got me fked why it's nearly all AN10 with most of this turbo oil drain stuff, as that's bloody smaller than the factory 3/4bsp to barb fitting on the front turbo block oil return.

Try find AN12 stuff, as there is definitely 3/4bsp to AN12 male fittings available for the block and 51mm flange to male AN12 turbo drain fittings out there.

My AN10 fitting off the turbo I had drilled out to AN12 diameter.  There’s plenty of meat in them to do it.  There’s no pressure in the drain system so sealing not a massive issue anyway.  I’ll see if the same can be done to the flex pipe when it finally turns up.

  • Like 1
On 10/03/2022 at 7:13 PM, Shoota_77 said:

My AN10 fitting off the turbo I had drilled out to AN12 diameter.  There’s plenty of meat in them to do it.  There’s no pressure in the drain system so sealing not a massive issue anyway.  I’ll see if the same can be done to the flex pipe when it finally turns up.

That's right, no pressure so you want it as big as possible the whole way from the turbo to the block / sump. If the Aeroflow flex has AN10 female fittings, which it does, it will still probably be too small internally on in the pipe.

Here is the smallest part on the oil drain which is into the block and its bigger than 17mm ID in the 3/4" barb-

20220311_172259.thumb.jpg.4099f80453f673ec949b870a62f12510.jpg

Here's the drain on a 6266 and 6466 around 19mm square. Not sure how big your Borg Warner is but I'd assume It'd be similar. Now I need a new drain gasket as I pulled the turbo off for this and killed it 😆

20220311_172336.thumb.jpg.8062669f45d1049e682c882276e0ed66.jpg

20220311_172513.thumb.jpg.95e50ef9f095b8745ebfe999772e898f.jpg

 

On 12/03/2022 at 5:00 PM, BK said:

That's right, no pressure so you want it as big as possible the whole way from the turbo to the block / sump. If the Aeroflow flex has AN10 female fittings, which it does, it will still probably be too small internally on in the pipe.

Here is the smallest part on the oil drain which is into the block and its bigger than 17mm ID in the 3/4" barb-

20220311_172259.thumb.jpg.4099f80453f673ec949b870a62f12510.jpg

Here's the drain on a 6266 and 6466 around 19mm square. Not sure how big your Birg Warner is but I'd assume It'd be similar. Now I need a new drain gasket as I pulled the turbo off for this and killed it 😆

20220311_172336.thumb.jpg.8062669f45d1049e682c882276e0ed66.jpg

20220311_172513.thumb.jpg.95e50ef9f095b8745ebfe999772e898f.jpg

 

Awesome thanks mate. Flick me an invoice for the gasket and I'll stick it to the fridge. I'll buy you a beer if you're ever back in Shepp!  🤣

  • Haha 1
On 12/03/2022 at 4:50 PM, r32-25t said:

The genuine precision one is a -10 but I got one from Motorsport connections and it’s a -12, like you I just think bigger is better 

They have actually a port matched square AN12 available as per a YouTube video online. Again, 5/8" or 16mm is the minimum. Dash 10 is not even in the ballpark for this.

Another big day at the King workshop. It was one of those Castle- like moments, as in

"Oh Steve could you move the Camira I need to get the Torana out so I can get to the Commodore. Steve – I’ll have to get the keys to the Cortina if I’m gonna move that Camira. Darryl – Yeah watch the boat mate"

In this case it was more "could you move the blue GTR ? I need to the WRX to get to the white GTR and put the Territory there, so move the blue GTR next to the XR6. Watch the Hilux mate"

Too much shit going on - doing the white GTR bottom end rebuild while doing a complete SY series II front end suspension conversion- look up SX / SY territory front end failures to see why.

I hate weekends at the moment 😡

20220313_142508.jpg

20220313_142500.jpg

20220314_173609.thumb.jpg.d5b915220265c58a6913e4088a47de60.jpg

20220314_173623.thumb.jpg.96a551c647ae48205a0d8390558f1cd0.jpg

20220313_142450.jpg

20220313_142439.jpg

20220313_142742.jpg

20220313_142824.thumb.jpg.4f81e6e2c3cd1084dcd8ef4186e9ad47.jpg

20220313_142640.jpg

20220313_142607.jpg

20220313_142528.jpg

 

  • Like 1
On 12/03/2022 at 7:46 PM, BK said:

Here is dash 10 at around 13.5mm inside and I'm probably / defintely stretching this. Dash 10 anything should not be used for turbo drain ever.

20220312_181406.thumb.jpg.2beae850bd83c1c7d1991882ced08762.jpg

I've just used the BMRS braided hose for my dry sump setup, although it's expensive it's perfect for turbo drains because it's so much more flexible than the teflon braided Speedflow or imitators. There's no way I would have done some of my lines in normal braided but BMRS in -16 bends like a dream without kinking.

Marcos at The Race Shop can hook you up, or MSCN in Sydney.

On 12/03/2022 at 7:46 PM, BK said:

Here is dash 10 at around 13.5mm inside and I'm probably / defintely stretching this. Dash 10 anything should not be used for turbo drain ever.

20220312_181406.thumb.jpg.2beae850bd83c1c7d1991882ced08762.jpg

For interests sake I measure the EFR oil drain at the turbo last night and it measures at only 12.25mm.  I finally received the AN10 flex hose and it measures about 11.95mm at the thinnest point which is the actual AN fitting itself that is welded onto the flex section.  I measured my AN fittings that screw into the adapter plate that bolts to the turbo itself and they're the bottle neck at about 11mm.  I might as well die grind or have them machined out to match the rest of the fittings at 12mm or so.  I'm making the bottom section out of 19mm stainless tube so it will have extra capacity to hold more capacity of oil if needed to give it time to drain away after a long pull or whatever.  I'm going to turn down the boost a bit (the oil boost!) with a supply regulator and I'm confident that will be all good. Sorry to thread hijack, just thought I'd throw that in there!

On 16/03/2022 at 8:21 AM, Shoota_77 said:

For interests sake I measure the EFR oil drain at the turbo last night and it measures at only 12.25mm.  I finally received the AN10 flex hose and it measures about 11.95mm at the thinnest point which is the actual AN fitting itself that is welded onto the flex section.  I measured my AN fittings that screw into the adapter plate that bolts to the turbo itself and they're the bottle neck at about 11mm.  I might as well die grind or have them machined out to match the rest of the fittings at 12mm or so.  I'm making the bottom section out of 19mm stainless tube so it will have extra capacity to hold more capacity of oil if needed to give it time to drain away after a long pull or whatever.  I'm going to turn down the boost a bit (the oil boost!) with a supply regulator and I'm confident that will be all good. Sorry to thread hijack, just thought I'd throw that in there!

No thread hijack at all, it's all relevant here. I'm surprised the EFR has such a small drain port. An oil reg would definitely help here with any sizing concerns for sure.

On 16/03/2022 at 11:53 AM, BK said:

No thread hijack at all, it's all relevant here. I'm surprised the EFR has such a small drain port. An oil reg would definitely help here with any sizing concerns for sure.

Yeah it's tiny compared to the Precisions.  Maybe they self regulate the oil flow a bit more?  I'd imagine as much as the diameter of the pipe the path plays a big role on the speed at which the oil drains away.  Too many tight bends and it will slow everything up.  The corrugated flex pipe is probably a slight restriction but it is 19mm or so internal diameter and it definitely needs an element of flex at some point in the setup to allow for vibration and heat expansion.  A cracked oil drain right next to a red hot exhaust manifold is a fire waiting to happen...

 

On 12/03/2022 at 5:09 PM, Shoota_77 said:

Awesome thanks mate. Flick me an invoice for the gasket and I'll stick it to the fridge. I'll buy you a beer if you're ever back in Shepp!  🤣

You know I'm gonna hold you to that and make a point to drop in now ! 😄 it's only 2300km or so away which is peanuts for us in the NT.

How is the place ? Gotta be better than here with the extremely high crime and f**kwit rate. I grew up on the Boulevard, raced motocross at Waaia and went to Gowrie Street primary as a little tacker in the 80s - loved it down there back then. My neice still lives there so I'll be down at some stage, so your 33 better be running by then 👍

Being Victoria, how do you think you'll go with registration for it ? I think about this for our single turbo GTRs when we move away...NT is a bit like who you know for rego sometimes as we have yearly pit inspections for cars over 10 years old which complicates matters.

That said you still see shit like this running around every day - at least the have some windows

IMG_20210623_083837_1.thumb.jpg.cd4e1b62c7a7d2d57296ed89422904fa.jpg

What a surprise. Cops are f**ken useless here...

Screenshot_20220316-210437_Chrome.thumb.jpg.214eff72480a3ece6b4a5791c0922c1e.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
×
×
  • Create New...