Jump to content
SAU Community

Removing sump


Recommended Posts

Hey everyone

have a quick question does anyone have a photo of under there engine on a r33 coupe? I’ve tried googling but got not nothing

 

reason for this, is my engine builder finally has the new engine running in the car and is telling me the sump is now leaking oil around the welds. He needs to remove the sump to fix it, But he needs to take the engine back out of the car, for when he goes to reinstall, he wants to make sure it fits 100 percent. He says a cross member and other stuff is in the way. Surely this couldn’t be right? 
 

couldn’t imagine you would have to take a motor out of a car just to put a sump back on? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh generally its much faster and easier to take the engine out. Ive seen it done with the engine in by unbolting the engine mounts and lifting the engine enough to get enough room in, but its bush mechanics 101 and not something a professional mechanic should be putting his limbs at risk with.

 

Shouldn't be that bad though, engine out is a 2 hour job, 3 hours max. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sic33r said:

Thanks very much everyone for the info

wow I’m surprised by the answers I got.  Well ya Learn something every day I guess

 

I get why you asked the question though, plenty of cars don't need to pull the motor out to remove the sump. We are just lucky I guess lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never done it but seem to agree with hardsteppa.

Removing lca's and cross member 

VS

complete engine and associated bits

I reckon I'd go option A.

Option B sounds excessive but as i said I've never done and not talking from experience.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This feels a bit like do you prefer blondes or brunettes....

I'd take the engine out for sure rather than drop the x member (noting dropping the x member is a hoist only option in practice. Apart from anything else, it lets you have easy access to properly clean the bottom end for resealing the sump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to remove the sump bolts with the motor on, then trying to remove the sump itself is very challenging (even with a hoist).

If you were doing this on jack stands, it would add even more complexities. And no, you can't use car ramps as with the subframe out there's nothing support the castor rods/LCAs.

Motor out is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Posted (edited)

I did manage to do this without removing the engine or front cross member, but I had the advantage that the exhaust manifold was removed. I am not setup to support the engine from the top or remove it.

1. Loosen the engine mount nuts so they only have a nut of thread. If it is a manual, I think you have to remove the gearbox to engine support brackets.

2. Jack up the engine off the bottom idler mount. Jack it up till the end of the slot and nut on the mount. You need this clearance to get the pan out at the rear of the engine.

2024-07-0423_04_37-Window.thumb.png.196b9c62c4a0589f16b32de17c7dfbbb.png

3.Break the sealant seal to sump. I found a oil pan separator tool helpful to get it started.

4. The oil pick up can be removed with the gap available. 

5. The oil pan can be removed now.

6. Before assembling, do not apply sealant to the oil pick up area as your hand will rub it all off but apply to the other three and a bit sides.

2024-07-0423_02_41-Window.thumb.png.6e862099a92c175424f2444f77910c35.png

7. It is a two man job to put the oil pan back, with the sealant, as you do not want it to touch anything and rub off.

8. With one person supporting the oil pan the other can fit the oil pickup

2024-07-0423_04_44-Window.thumb.png.0daea4b2430a31413a7eb8f022262348.png

9. Apply the remaining sealant. This would be more difficult with the manifold or turbo in place, but I think it could be done. As you can see my sealant is a bit ugly, but good enough to seal.

2024-07-0423_04_22-Window.thumb.png.b559ce865ba7d0731e6d0ab026f09d86.png

10. Lift the sump up to the engine and bolt it on. We found it was easier to use two long guide bolts at each end to get it nice and aligned without touching.

Edited by elohim_imanu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd settle for just pulling the engine. Then may as well have everything else inspected while you're at it and think about throwing a stroker kit in there with valve relief pistons for 50 degree advance VCAM and maybe a spline drive oil pump and other oil control mods on top of that and maybe a helical front LSD too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I talked to WS they said I could either have a charge cable connecting the alt to the starter or the alt to the fuse box which I have it.  The two wires shown are one from the alt to starter and the other is the ring terminal from the harness that says starter power.  Theres no power wire shown.  I asked him he said there should be in power wire from the battery, the ring terminal from the harness, and then finally the signal spade connector I have it set up like that currently.  I'm just gonna test all the stuff Duncan said and will get back to yall.
    • According to the photo, the start signal wire would not have a ring terminal on it. It would have a normal push on spade socket (the spade itself is the terminal on the starter solenoid). Anything with a ring terminal would want to be the main, big, fat wire that actually carries the many many amps that run the starter motor itself. In that photo, WS appear to be providing a pair of fat wires to the starter, one from the alternator output and one from the battery - effectively making the connection between the alternator and the battery at the starter. I dunno. Maybe this is the way it is done with vehicles with the battery in the boot (because the batter wire comes from the rear, under the car. But I think on front battery cars the connection is typically direct from alt to battery. The battery to starter connection is also direct, so the common point is at the battery, not the starter. Either will work, but the loom really should reflect the chassis as well as the engine.
    • @fletch rb30 looks good! If my motor wasn't in the car, or the timing belt was off, I would be redoing the hardline to run it in front of the motor like what you've done. Another idea is to return it back to the thermostats housing, similar to how it's done on the RB26, could that be an option?
    • With ECUTek you purchase a "key" to load and modify the tune, once you buy the "key", cable and software you can play around all you want, the tune and ability to change it is locked to that cars ECU's with the "key" though My 86 ran ECUTek, Pulse Racing could run it up, log and play with the tune to get it on point, same thing is currently going on with the MX5 at MX5 Mania as we speak
    • Ok thanks a lot ill check it all in a couple hours too hot right now.  What about the the ring terminal on the harness what would that be for it just says signal on it.  It is also is positive while the key in on mode right before start  
×
×
  • Create New...