Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, YouTRIPPIN? said:

i would but im dreading the fact that it will be annoying to take it off and on - and the chances of losing the fitment (like what happened when i took it off the first time)

 

also dont know how well the flush would be since it feels like the measurements of it is shorter - since theres gaps between the fender and the bumpers itself which was filled with silicone to cover it (shown in the pics above)

 

i like the look of this better tho its not as eye soring as my current one and looks more clean 🤣

 

image.png.508c32b22e09cb6cc0c35d567ee6dbac.png

Aye thats my best mates. I put that lip on with him.
We got the front from Ebay and the sides from body kit kingdom. Thats just the stock Base model 370GT Bumper. Can get them pretty cheap. SP ones are a bit more costly

1 hour ago, DashyyPC said:

Aye thats my best mates. I put that lip on with him.
We got the front from Ebay and the sides from body kit kingdom. Thats just the stock Base model 370GT Bumper. Can get them pretty cheap. SP ones are a bit more costly

LOL we're probably in the same page then VQ Australia, yea was speaking to him before and he helped me out 🤣

Edited by YouTRIPPIN?
5 hours ago, YouTRIPPIN? said:

LOL we're probably in the same page then VQ Australia, yea was speaking to him before and he helped me out 🤣

yea me and him are admins of VQ aus haha

  • Haha 1

so im missing these brackets on both of my sides - where the fender meets the front bumper above the headlight. Wondering if this could be an issue if i replace my bumper with OEM? 

image.png.4b3a05e2ae2c32e2dba76adfad0b4cff.png

image.png.20482520803ec8aa0b37c9b39c341a9c.png

 

image.thumb.png.b80af17c5252c3ab893806e08a9b623a.png

Edited by YouTRIPPIN?

You dont really need them.
Mine and my mates went away a long time ago. we just put a rivnut on there, actually easier to use than the OEM bracket

6 hours ago, DashyyPC said:

You dont really need them.
Mine and my mates went away a long time ago. we just put a rivnut on there, actually easier to use than the OEM bracket

do you have a pic of it? just need to see how it can be done 

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 years later...
On 2/22/2021 at 9:03 AM, DashyyPC said:

You dont really need them.
Mine and my mates went away a long time ago. we just put a rivnut on there, actually easier to use than the OEM bracket

you got any pics of these? might try and do this as well 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...