Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe there is a second brass air flow restrictor pill somewhere, I think it damps the feed of manifold pressure to the stock boost control system. Does anyone know where it is, and if its the same diameter as the famous one that is often removed to get 0.9 bar?

I remember a post saying one is under the intake manifold, I guess in a tube feeding manifold pressure, but someone else posted it is built into the metal pipework..

If one is reverting from an ebc and both pills have long gone, would like to know where it is supposed to be fitted, and if they are interchangeable. 

There is a second restrictor, and it limits boost to roughly 22psi.  However you won't find it in any normal engine as it's only added to Nismo S/R engines.  I guess that's how Nismo decided to increase boost without active boost control device.  I don't know much about it, I just happened to see one in a Nismo S1 engine under the intake plenum.

Edit: This S1 engine was in a R32, so it's not limited to just R34.

OaCndNZ.png

Edited by TXSquirrel
  • Like 1
10 hours ago, TXSquirrel said:

There is a second restrictor, and it limits boost to roughly 22psi.  However you won't find it in any normal engine as it's only added to Nismo S/R engines.

thank you! in S15s according to a digram on nistune the two pills supposedly bracket the boost that the solenoid works with, via a ratio of one to ‘tother dia. Would this second one logically be larger or smaller than the normal one? I guess its function is to raise the boost floor the stock system works within.

on an s1/r1 would the normal one (the one commonly removed on stock r34s), have a larger hole than standard?

(am helping a friend get his r1 boost control system back to stock. in the dark with these two restrictors, a bit)

52ED8BAE-B0C3-4813-AA47-CF02483D5355.png

Edited by syd_gtr

When I said I don't know much about the this, I should have said I don't know anything at all instead.

That R32 was just a customer's car at a shop I visited, I thought it was bizarre so I took a picture.  They did confirm first pill was still there before they took the engine apart, but I didn't ask any other detail about it.  I guess you will just have to figure out the diameter through trial and error.

Edit: I doubt you need both pills to control boost at a higher psi.  Nismo may have left that first pill in place for originality and could be redundant. 

Edited by TXSquirrel

Interesting. A restrictor would function for pressure reduction if there is airflow, but also a damper of some kind to moderate the function of the solenoid, which has a duty cycle. Guess I'm going to have to try to find out from someone in Japan what's up with all this and/or some trial and error as you say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’d love to find some where that can recover the dashes to look brand new and original. Mine has a very slight bubble, nothing compared to some I’ve seen though 
    • $170K. I asked one of the guys there as a joke if that price was just for the passenger seat as it was where the price sheet was... he tried really hard to crack a smile 😄 He also mentioned that every single part of the car was inspected and either restored or replaced with a new or as new part, or made from scratch. The interior was incredible, every inch like a new car.
    • Time for a modernisation, throw out the AFM, stock O2s, ECU into the e-waste bin. Rip out the cable throttle, IACV, pedal, etc. into the scrap metal bin. DBW, e-throttle, modern ECU, CANbus wideband, and the thing will drive better than when it left the factory.
    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
×
×
  • Create New...