Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe there is a second brass air flow restrictor pill somewhere, I think it damps the feed of manifold pressure to the stock boost control system. Does anyone know where it is, and if its the same diameter as the famous one that is often removed to get 0.9 bar?

I remember a post saying one is under the intake manifold, I guess in a tube feeding manifold pressure, but someone else posted it is built into the metal pipework..

If one is reverting from an ebc and both pills have long gone, would like to know where it is supposed to be fitted, and if they are interchangeable. 

There is a second restrictor, and it limits boost to roughly 22psi.  However you won't find it in any normal engine as it's only added to Nismo S/R engines.  I guess that's how Nismo decided to increase boost without active boost control device.  I don't know much about it, I just happened to see one in a Nismo S1 engine under the intake plenum.

Edit: This S1 engine was in a R32, so it's not limited to just R34.

OaCndNZ.png

Edited by TXSquirrel
  • Like 1
10 hours ago, TXSquirrel said:

There is a second restrictor, and it limits boost to roughly 22psi.  However you won't find it in any normal engine as it's only added to Nismo S/R engines.

thank you! in S15s according to a digram on nistune the two pills supposedly bracket the boost that the solenoid works with, via a ratio of one to ‘tother dia. Would this second one logically be larger or smaller than the normal one? I guess its function is to raise the boost floor the stock system works within.

on an s1/r1 would the normal one (the one commonly removed on stock r34s), have a larger hole than standard?

(am helping a friend get his r1 boost control system back to stock. in the dark with these two restrictors, a bit)

52ED8BAE-B0C3-4813-AA47-CF02483D5355.png

Edited by syd_gtr

When I said I don't know much about the this, I should have said I don't know anything at all instead.

That R32 was just a customer's car at a shop I visited, I thought it was bizarre so I took a picture.  They did confirm first pill was still there before they took the engine apart, but I didn't ask any other detail about it.  I guess you will just have to figure out the diameter through trial and error.

Edit: I doubt you need both pills to control boost at a higher psi.  Nismo may have left that first pill in place for originality and could be redundant. 

Edited by TXSquirrel

Interesting. A restrictor would function for pressure reduction if there is airflow, but also a damper of some kind to moderate the function of the solenoid, which has a duty cycle. Guess I'm going to have to try to find out from someone in Japan what's up with all this and/or some trial and error as you say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like the solenoid might be cactus, if the solenoid trigger wire was still attached (and it was just the main power to the starter itself remove). Just to provoke Neil haunting me for the rest of my life... Have you tried tapping it with a hammer while someone switches the key to start? This might work for the fuel pump too... 😛
    • I need help dealing with an engineer who is massively overcharging me for an engineering report on my modified, written-off Jeep to get it roadworthy. 🔹 Initially, he quoted me $3,500 - $4,500. 🔹 First invoice: $5,315 (already above the quote). 🔹 Second invoice: $1,375. 🔹 Now, he has sent another invoice for $3,100! This is way more than double what I was originally quoted. I feel like I’m being ripped off. Has anyone dealt with something like this before? What can I do? Any advice on how to report him or fight these unfair charges? Would really appreciate any guidance! 🙏 Am in Adelaide.
    • I dunno man, that VX S with 200,000 k's is still hanging out for 1.5 I reckon the R34 is the better buy, personally.
    • Dang, doesn't even include on roads.
    • Only in a market where OBD was a thing. The rest of the world was quite happy to let the US EPA only affect US cars for quite a while. The* problem with datalogs is that unless you are very familiar with what every trace should look like, on their own and as an ensemble, you can and will see weird shit that can and will lead you astray, not realising that what you are seeing is the normal consequence of various transient inputs. *Really, "a" problem, as there are of course many other problems too. Look, these cars are so bloody simple that if it is missing or stumbling, the obvious thing is to break out the old mental diagnostic list and just go do all the things that you know you should. After proving that the plugs are clean and sound, ditto the coil stalks, coils, loom connectors, etc, and then making sure that there is fuel pressure at about the right numbers (while driving!, not while sitting in the garage free blipping it), then maybe you go looking at AFM voltages, manually testing the igniter, putting a scope on the CAS, etc. Then you're into pulling the injectors for a spray pattern look-see and perhaps a clean, squirting carby cleaner around the inlet manifold looking for leaks, and all the more annoying and esoteric, but still common as muck faults that these things have. I wouldn't ever bother looking at the trims, as they are usually bullshit on these old clunkers anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...