Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello
I wish to have any advice on how to access the Hicas ECU of R32 GT-R.
I successfully initialized the Engine ECU by sending 0xff 0xff 0xef and then I can read engine parts live data. But I fail to initialize the Hicas ECU. While I try to send 0xff 0xff 0xe4 as the Hicas initialization command which I belive, no response is received from ECU. I try to send 0xff 0xff 0xe4 even twice with no success. The response from the ECU is actually observed as 0x00, 0x00, and nothing after that. Since I think that the initialization command is correct, I have no idea in terms of accessing the Hicas ECU. In the event that the Hicas ECU is successfully initialized, therefore, your advice is highly appreciated. Thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/482627-nissan-consult-hicas-access/
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2021 at 5:29 AM, r32gtrjp said:

You are fourtune. I cannot afford to buy a commercial one.

Who owns one? Not me. My friendly neighbourhood workshop does. Helps that it's my brother-in-law's workshop. But, any decent general automotive workshop needs to have an all-rand capable scan tool to do anything with modern cars. If a workshop doesn't have one, they just can't fix vehicle electronic problems these days.

Sounds interesting. Could you elaborate on your project in whole? I mean what sort of setup are you aiming for.

I would love to have some way of getting Arduino to talk via Consult and then display different parameters on a small display, without having to always pull out a laptop to check something small.

On the topic; I am way out of my league here, but could it be that you first need to (or especially DON'T) initialize the ECU connection and then sort of "switch" to HICAS side?

If I recall correctly, the Nissan DataScan SW has the ECU and HICAS very separate, meaning that you cannot just switch from one to another on the fly, but you need to reconnect to talk to HICAS.

Also, have you asked Matt at Nistune forum?

Hi,
I initiate my project when I wish to monitor the engine live data on a handy manner three month ago. I trust that Arduino is a fit to my objective. I currently monitor namely, vss, rpm, coolant temp, battery,  btdc, inj. time, throttle, O2, AAC, MAF, A/F, A/Fself, DTC up to 13 data due to 20x4 LCD size restriction. I have also developed two separate Arduino programs designated to the idle adjustment (in which the AAC valve enables to be off by Consult. It is cool rather than the manner to take the connector off physically) as well as the fault code.
The project is done.

My main system is to utilize Arduino with LCD as the following system diagram.
Consult 14 pin connector <-> Inhouse I/F adapter (like the commercial product Nissan-14) <-> Arduino with LCD. An alternative one is Consult 14 pin connector <-> Inhouse I/F adapter <-> USB-TTL adapter(CH340) <-> free software like ecuTalk or Conzult in Windows10. I use Python partially to check status of serial data transmission (Tx,Rx), which is much easier to deal with than Arduino. I have no plan to develop a system based on Python. While Pyhton does not matter os, I use Ubuntu mainly.

The other day I browse the R32 service manual, I come across the Hicas diagnostic test. I wish to simulate the test conducted by Consult so as to watch the rear wheel turning actually.
This is a present stage to struggle the initialization. 

I agree with you as well that both ECU need to be initialized. Because the Hicas ECU (wire #5? in trunk) connects to the engine ECU (passenger side) and it finally goes to Consult 14 pin outlet. The engine ECU is initialized first and then followed by the Hicas ECU. I think that both ECU should be on a standby condition concurrently.
Once the Hicas ECU is initialized, no any other significant issues on the following events would remain.

No. I have no idea on Nistune, etc at all.

That's all.  How comes in this morning trial?

It's not a pity at all. HICAS is a liability and interferes with vehicle stabiilty at the limit. It was only created to make the car feel more willing to turn in when driving at <7/10ths. Try to drive the car properly hard and HICAS fights the driver's inputs. Better neutralised than kept.

30 years later, the computers running 4WS systems are better. Back then, they sucked. Too simplistic.

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear All

The issue seems to be resolved. Now I would like to conclude the topic. 

I have successfully identified the Hicas ECU number.

All information related to Hicas is correctly described in the PLMS Consult protocol. A clue for solution is to revisit the implicit assumption imposed.

Thank you for your supports.

Good bye

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The easiest option might be to just spray a bunch of fish oil in there.  At least that way you can feel like you've done something while you continue to ignore it
    • I'm firmly on the "zero compliance is good compliance" for FUCAs. I'd be looking to solid metal joints even if the primary reason for having them is because they facilitate the twist in the arm. I have never been more happy with the way the front suspension behaves than I have since I got rid of the FUCA bushes. Even the thin little (short lived) poly bushes in the Whiteline adjustables have too much compliance for my liking. It probably won't be long before I have sphericals nearly everywhere, probably including both top and bottom arms in the rear, and I'll start complaining about the increased costs for dental work. But I will be enjoying the driving more, I'm sure.
    • Plus, you'll get great experience in bedding in pads!
    • I have offset Nismo brackets so the fact the gktechs can pivot is less important to me. I have 170mm JIC arms with bushings - but they provide no adjustment and I'm not sure whiteline eccentric bushings will fit them (I don't want to ruin the bushings currently in them to find out). Ideally I want something with bushings + adjustment; hence why I'd like to find a pair of these. Unfortunately they aren't easy to find.
    • @Vee37 How much do you really care about finding these pads again? If your pads are quiet, work well and produce minimal dust, really isn't that enough? If you are set on finding the exact pads again, I suppose I'd do something like this -  Visit your local Jax, find out what brand of pads they carry. If the Jax workshop you previously went to had the pads on the shelf, then you can almost guarantee it will be of said brand.   I'm guessing you don't have the receipt for the previous work and pads. Can you visit a Jax workshop and see if they can look up your previous job to see what pads were fitted?  Still no luck? Put your stalker hat on, find the staff that used to work at the Jax store and ask them. Talk to local workshops, try to find out where the mechanics went to. Talk to Jax workshops, maybe they relocated to another workshop. When it comes to mechanics, its a small world. You'd be surprised how easy it is to track someone down. If these ideas don't work, shit will start getting crazy very quickly.... You could find out every brand and model of pad that fits that car... and try them individually ticking each off the list if it wasn't the one you were looking for.... If you go down this path your going to want to learn how to swap pads yourself, it is very easy, takes minimal tools and space. If you have room to park the car you have room to swap the pads. Plus you have the advantage of making sure all the brake hardware goes back in so they won't squeal! 
×
×
  • Create New...