Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all 

I have conflicting info about the stock s15 jap spec manual injectors

I require the correct cc and lag times for my apexi

 

I have seen cc range from 440 444 448 and 480cc

And as fo lag times .5 .583 .78ms

As well as confusing the nismo 480 with 1.100ms

 

My new injectors are 850cc with a lag of .780 at 14volt 

 

Are the stock lag timea measured at 14v also

I did speak with john at fc hacko and recomened i spoke with paulr33 

 

 

Screenshot_20211119-111240_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20211119-121622_Email.jpg

Screenshot_20211119-115722_Chrome.jpg

Well, they're not 480, and it wouldn't matter if they were supposed to be 440, 444 or 448, as <1% difference is far smaller than the random tolerances anyway.

As to the dead times.....dunno. But the part numbers are well known and I have seen very good tables listing all Nissan injectors against part # and specs, which I', not going to google up now.

Thanks it more what the apexi wants. I have googled for a few hours with not much definitive as well as the apexi manual. So many people saying they are 480cc i dont belive it myself.

I will be going with the 448cc and .583ms

As a stab in the dark starting point

Im sure alot of people have been down this path. 

On 11/18/2021 at 11:03 PM, Noakesy said:

Thanks it more what the apexi wants. I have googled for a few hours with not much definitive as well as the apexi manual. So many people saying they are 480cc i dont belive it myself.

I will be going with the 448cc and .583ms

As a stab in the dark starting point

Im sure alot of people have been down this path. 

I have recently sent my OEM RB26 injectors out for service as a part of preparation for California emissions. Also as a part of that because I really don't want to waste perfectly good o-rings 6 months down the road I asked them to test the dead time and all that fun stuff. The spec for the stock injectors at 3 bar was something like 480 cc/min, I got 500 cc/min on average. The OEM ECU reports 0.77 ms dead time, their testing reported closer 0.5 ms. I asked them multiple times whether that made any sense, especially whether 4 bar having roughly similar but slightly lower dead time was normal for old injectors. Their answer was yes. I haven't started engine map development yet so I can't say whether their report was truly accurate but something to think about.

480cc is when it's a 3.5bar.

Stock fuel pressure is 3 bar, they're in the 450cc range.

Also if you're tuning on an ancient GameboyFC ECU just adjust the dead time till you hit stoich with the idle fuel cells at 1.00.

Don't over think it.

 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Agreed it actively wants to kill you which I love driving fast cars slow is my stick
    • Awesome! I was thinking S14 since they are longer. I'll give those a shot. Thanks for the input!
    • Far out, that thing looks like some loose fun!  Nothing beats the rawness of a filthy old Nissan with zero aids to keep the wheels pointing in the right direction like modern "fast" cars!    
    • If there is no ridge at the inner edge of the battery tray (ie the battery tray is flat until it rolls off the edge into the open space of the bay), then no, it won't matter if it overhangs. If the battery would be propped up by any ridge, then that wouldn't be ideal. The bottom of the battery case would not be sharing the load. It would be concentrated on one end edge and a line across the bottom where it contacts the ridge. And possibly it wouldn't fit under the locking clamp either. I only upsized my battery to the max because: I sometime have to leave my car undriven for weeks at a time while I am away for work. On the previous battery (replaced a couple of months ago) I had to leave it undriven for months at a time!! I sometimes abuse the battery by running the stereo up loud for many hours while I wash and polish it. This is how I realised that the previous battery was on its last legs, because it got to the point where it was too weak to start after a couple of such. It was 7 years old though, so, fair play. Supercheap had a good special so the X was only ~$250 instead of ~$320, which seemed sufficiently less painful. I had already been using NS70 for the previous 2 batteries for most of the same reasons as above. The X is just the final boss level. I was contemplating going LiFePO4. But it's like $900 to do that properly, and while you save >10 kg of weight, you can likely only expect a couple of years longer life. So meh. Maybe when the price comes down further. Although, in ~7 years when I have to replace this one, I might not be allowed to drive such an anti-social vehicle anyway.  
    • If I get a larger battery and it hangs off the edge of the frame rail, would this be an issue? With FMIC a lot of people downgrade their battery size due to less room for shit, was wondering if it would affect anything but it would still be tight via the clamp.
×
×
  • Create New...