Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 21/01/2022 at 4:17 PM, GTSBoy said:

Doesn't rev to 12k , by the way. Typical American cock throttling.

Always, like how they talk in fly wheel horse power to sound like they're making big numbers.

On 1/21/2022 at 3:55 PM, vosadrian said:

I get that the RBs in NA form are not the best engines around. I'm not looking for the highest power NA engine around. We are really doing NA for sound and feel and we want to keep to the Nissan/Datsun family and we want to keep it straight 6. Obviously we could stick an E46 M3 engine in or something and that is a good NA straight 6. But we want to keep it in the family. Does that then leave just L series and RB series engines? Another point, is we want it EFI (I have worked a lot in aftermarket EFI and I enjoy working with it and tuning etc.). My take is that by the time you adapted an L series to EFI and modified it for good power, you would be down more $$ than doing the same with RB series. Have I got this wrong?

And we don't need huge power.... but we do want to optimise what we have. But not to 110%. I'm all for finding some easy extra revs with an oil pump upgrade and some decent cams and valve train... but I don't need fully lightened balanced for 12k RPM at very expensive $$. As I said, it is more about the sound and feel. But if we can spend a few $k on getting the bottom end to rev reliably and the top end to flow to good revs, we would go that far. Is RB the right choice for this? Is there another option I have missed?

As I said, I'm not trying to talk you out of it. Just pointing out that you should not get your hopes up that a small 6 cylinder twin cam is going to make it feel like a proper sports car. I have no doubt that if you pay someone big money they can be made to make good power. Look at the old Holden 202 - they are pushing well over 300HP out of those nowadays. But back in my day (the 80s) it was a struggle to get 200HP out of them. People learnt what to do to make them make power. But it costs.

There hasn't been a heap of development into making NA RBs make a lot of power, because.....the lure of the turbo reveals how poor the value proposition is. Yes, they sound bloody awesome revving to the moon through open ram tubes and long primary extractors. But the time taken to run from the bottom of the rev range to the top of the rev range reveals that they don't make a lot of power doing it. Listen too the Hakosuka video

 for the nearest example.

  • Like 1

So if I want to build an RB based NA engine, which (reasonably priced and accessible) head option is going to give me the best result? It seems the RB25DE NEO has small ports and may not be easily ported for the best result. I believe the non NEO heads are the same casting between turbo and NA? So would either of those options be OK... or better to go turbo as perhaps the valve springs are OK for cams? Or are NEO turbo heads a better option due to solid lifters, so better for high RPM?

If you're doing porting, it probably doesn't matter that the NA Neo ports start out small. It's just a bit more metal too remove - provided that the eater jackets aren't actually closer to the port walls, which is an unknown (at least to me).

Neo is simply better. Better combustion chamber shape, better valve train. Arguably better valve angle but I actually don't know what this does to the port shape around the short turn, so it could be a win-lose situation there.

But..... here we are talking about small differences. It's not as if there's 50HP available between your best option and your worst option. If it is more than 20HP I'll be very surprised.

Thanks for that. Who knows RB heads. Is Lewis engines a good option? Just looking for someone knowledgable who can set up porting and valve train optimised but at a fair price? Thinking I might send the heads somewhere to get them done. Possibly someone who might set up the bottom end also and supply a complete long motor. I might contact them first and make sure I am getting the right bits for them to work on.

Try Rams Head Service, but also be prepared to pay.

I got a quote to machine my old NEO head and convert to shimless and let's just say it was cheaper to source and another head, fit new shims and buckets it to with plenty of change left for strippers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah no bearings, just slip fit.  Would be a reasonably challenging but not impossible job to modify it to run bearings but I'm hoping that's not necessary as I may have well built one myself if I end up spending hours modifying it!
    • Brumbys with good shells are bloody expensive, I've looked at 2 "cheaper" cars, and walked away from both,  plus after some research spare parts are fairly sparce I'm starting to think that I missed the boat on finding a clean one that is straight (ish) and without alot rust I'm starting to think about a old Hilux as panels and other parts are much more available as they sold tens of thousands of them I use to be indecisive but now I'm not sure
    • A Brumby would probably fit a big metal toolbox in the back... this is how it begins  
    • Picked up a new OEM boot seal for the MX5 today as the old one got ripped a bit by me being a idiot by seeing if I could fit a large metal tool box in it, it didn't fit, and ripped the seal with the corner of the tool box I am still waiting on time to get the cams and new balancer installed, as well as the repairs to the boot Time will not be an issue soon though
    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...