Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is probably a stupid question, but i have a factory standard R32 GTR which has blown its standard turbos. i dont have a lot of money at the moment so its just sitting there doing nothing. if i replaced the factory turbos with -9s and ran factory boost would the car be safe to drive? an aftermarket ecu is on the cards in the future but sadly funds wont aloow it at the moment. 

On 5/5/2022 at 8:43 PM, Fizurg said:

This is probably a stupid question, but i have a factory standard R32 GTR which has blown its standard turbos. i dont have a lot of money at the moment so its just sitting there doing nothing. if i replaced the factory turbos with -9s and ran factory boost would the car be safe to drive? an aftermarket ecu is on the cards in the future but sadly funds wont aloow it at the moment. 

It would be safe to drive on, but you'd want to avoid more than like 0.5 bar. Even at factory boost levels like 0.7 bar you could hit the final load column at which point you will lose something like 5-8 degrees of timing. I have GTIII-SS turbos on my car without a tune right now due to emissions reasons and just a single WOT pull caused a pretty strong smell in the exhaust like it wasn't doing good things to the catalytic converter. It definitely hit the last load cell and I believe the MAF hit something like 4V.

I am hoping to finish up my emissions issues soon so I can get started on ECU map development, then I can show people just how awful the HKS nuggets are.

I agree, it could be OK. They only flow a little more air than standard, especially if boost is low and those early ECUs allowed a lot more leeway for small changes than later r series.

Most likely it will just blow black smoke (running rich, ECU adding too much fuel) as it comes onto boost. However, much worse would be if it does not add enough fuel for the extra air, in this case it will ping (sounds like rocks rattling in a tin), this can kill your engine very quickly

You can't get less boost than the spring pressure on the turbo's wastegate. Most replacement turbos come with 0.8 or 1 bar.

You can stay off full boost by not keeping your foot at 100% as it comes on.

so i guess the main question is . am i better off having it driveable but not running properly or not driving at all?

also another question. where is the factory ecu? id like to leave then engine bay look factory and ive been told to use an Nistune as it looks factory but if something like a haltech will be better and be hidden anyway so it wont matter?

A wastegate like this will allow you to adjust the boost by changing out the springs. This wastegate comes with a 7 psi spring which sounds like what your after. 

You can run various combinations of springs to have between 3 psi up to 26 psi.

https://www.turbosmart.com/product/iwg75-uni-150mm-actuator-7psi/

Not the cheapest option as you'd need to buy 2 of these things, but if your going to keep the -9 turbos, the extra adjustability of these wastegates is nice.  

On 5/6/2022 at 2:17 PM, Fizurg said:

so i guess the main question is . am i better off having it driveable but not running properly or not driving at all?

also another question. where is the factory ecu? id like to leave then engine bay look factory and ive been told to use an Nistune as it looks factory but if something like a haltech will be better and be hidden anyway so it wont matter?

You could install the -9 turbos, turn the boost down and put it on the dyno to check the mixtures to ensure everything is safe. 

The haltech would be hidden behind the passenger side kick panel. If whoever is inspecting the car pulls that panel off, they would spot the aftermarket ecu. 

On 06/05/2022 at 4:22 PM, Murray_Calavera said:

You could install the -9 turbos, turn the boost down and put it on the dyno to check the mixtures to ensure everything is safe. 

The haltech would be hidden behind the passenger side kick panel. If whoever is inspecting the car pulls that panel off, they would spot the aftermarket ecu. 

Awesome, so no issues there then. 

I had planned to build the car with a lot more power and build the type of car i dreamed of as a teenager. but since buying it my partner has gotten pregnant and so spending money on toys has gotten slightly harder to justify. no i plan to ust get it back on the road and keep it as factory as possible, with only a few bolt ons. 

On 5/5/2022 at 9:09 PM, Duncan said:

I agree, it could be OK. They only flow a little more air than standard, especially if boost is low and those early ECUs allowed a lot more leeway for small changes than later r series.

Most likely it will just blow black smoke (running rich, ECU adding too much fuel) as it comes onto boost. However, much worse would be if it does not add enough fuel for the extra air, in this case it will ping (sounds like rocks rattling in a tin), this can kill your engine very quickly

As far as I know the factory ECU up to the MAF/fuel flow limit will have a pretty reasonable AFR target, it's really just the pulling of timing to a pretty impressive extent that is a concern as it will spike EGTs. 

On 5/5/2022 at 9:07 PM, Fizurg said:

cheers for the reply. just having it driveable would be nice. then i could take it to the tuners and have an ecu fitted and tuned when i have the money. how do you limit the boost to 0.5 bar?

Either you put a 0.5 bar wastegate actuator in the turbo and unplug the electrical connector on the boost solenoid or don't press your foot too far down on the accelerator pedal. I currently have my turbos running wastegate spring pressure which is still too high (~0.88 bar) so I have to compensate by not metering a ton of air. Keep in mind that because of the ignition timing retard on the final load column you will actually have less power than if you had kept the airflow within the bounds. I only did it once to see what would happen and it was a split second, I was going to tell the driver to let off immediately if anything my Consult dashboard suggested looked bad like maxing out the MAF, excessive injector duty cycle, etc.

There was another thread recently about mounting something like a Haltech Elite in the factory position, I checked with the seller of a bracket and he posted pictures of it mounted in the factory position with the kick plate installed. Obviously if you add stuff like the WB1/etc you will have to figure out how to get all of that mounted as well: https://www.instagram.com/p/CX5YuEuKQSx/

  • Like 1

Another option is, get the turbos on, then get a Nistune ECU get it tuned OR get a Haltech Platinum Pro (not too expensive) unplug the AFMs/MAFs and feed a vacuum hose to the ECU and just use the base map (has crap all timing in it).

On 5/6/2022 at 3:25 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Another option is, get the turbos on, then get a Nistune ECU get it tuned OR get a Haltech Platinum Pro (not too expensive) unplug the AFMs/MAFs and feed a vacuum hose to the ECU and just use the base map (has crap all timing in it).

With the added benefit that the Nistune would let the OP keep is stock appearance as well. 

On 06/05/2022 at 4:13 PM, GTSBoy said:

Just Nistune the ECU first. Then replace turbos.

but his standard turbos have already died, nek minnit PRP catalogue, block brace, G40-900 twin gates, Samsonas

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
On 6/5/2022 at 5:25 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Another option is, get the turbos on, then get a Nistune ECU get it tuned OR get a Haltech Platinum Pro (not too expensive) unplug the AFMs/MAFs and feed a vacuum hose to the ECU and just use the base map (has crap all timing in it).

Would this really work? Also why won’t the MAFs work with an aftermarket ECU?

Edited by Fizurg
On 5/6/2022 at 6:25 AM, Fizurg said:

Would this really work? Also why won’t the MAFs work with an aftermarket ECU?

Dual MAFs requires more analog inputs that most ECUs don’t have. This is on top of the fact that MAF tuning is wildly unpopular outside of OEM applications. Haltech is one of the few companies that supports the MAFs but you’re going to have to find someone that is actually willing to tune with MAFs. I need to test how the Haltech actually works with MAFs though. I plan on replicating the stock ECU map as much as possible on a Haltech Elite ECU but it’s blocked by registration issues. 

On 06/05/2022 at 11:25 PM, Fizurg said:

Would this really work? Also why won’t the MAFs work with an aftermarket ECU?

You'll be stupid to use them, given you have the option of speed density with the Haltech not to mention the benefits of binning the MAFs modified FI cars.

Nissan used AFMs rather than MAP sensors for a reason, it wasn't an accident. They might cause intake restrictions at very high power but they are excellent for things like cold start, atmospheric pressure adjustment etc.

Anyway, if you want the cheapest aftermarket ECU so you can tune it, a power fc is about 30-50% the cost of a haltech (500-800$), and the base map is usable without a tune in the short term.

AFMs will always provide more accurate fueling, not going to deny that.

Hence on direct injected they actually use both MAP and AFMs/MAFs to determine load and all the other parameters.

On 5/6/2022 at 1:40 PM, Duncan said:

Nissan used AFMs rather than MAP sensors for a reason, it wasn't an accident. They might cause intake restrictions at very high power but they are excellent for things like cold start, atmospheric pressure adjustment etc.

Anyway, if you want the cheapest aftermarket ECU so you can tune it, a power fc is about 30-50% the cost of a haltech (500-800$), and the base map is usable without a tune in the short term.

Something I've been thinking about for a while is why with ITBs everyone is still using pure TPS in certain cases instead of throttle mass flow or something like that. It seems insane to me to tune based on a variable that doesn't actually represent engine load. There's so many accessories that will change their load significantly, atmospheric compensation, gearing/road load, etc. The factory intake manifold already has the post-TB port on the back of the balance tube, all you need at that point is to put a pressure sensor in the plenum/intake manifold collector off the AAC valve pipe for example. At which point the delta pressure across the throttle body combined with throttle position should be able to generate an estimated g/s flow rate.

I still plan on using MAFs anyways but if Haltech ever implements throttle mass flow I would probably consider actually switching over as it's pretty crazy just how much piping is between the MAF sensor and the intake valve from the factory.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Convert to dual filament bulb   FWIW, it will look odd - I dare say a bit dumb as it looks like your flasher relay has shit the bed.
    • If the RB20 box in the car is a push clutch, then yes, you will need to deal with the pull clutch on the turbo box. You either buy a pull clutch and don't use the old one, or you do the things needed to convert the turbo box's clutch arrangement over to push. Which is a bit of a f**karound. "Making" a custom tailshaft is the easy part. But you will need to source the front clip yoke - the bit that goes into the output of the gearbox. These are not as easy to find. They are out there, but they don't grow on trees the way that they used to.
    • Indicator bulbs are way too bright to use as a "corner marker" (we call them parking lights too). Sure. Go ahead and do it. But realise that you wil need to come up with all your own wiring to do it, as no-one will have a standard howto worked out for Skylines. It's just a matter of abandoning everything that Nissan have done and starting from scratch. You'd probably be better off retrofitting tailght/brakelight globe bases into the front indicator housings and using the taillight circuit for your corner marker and the brake light as the indicator. You'd need to work out how to kill the marker circuit while the indicator is flashing, otherwise it won't flash on-off, just bright-less bright.
    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...