Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483710-turbo-copper-washers/
Share on other sites

First up, Nissan didn't use 2 washers on the oil inlet which is the clue that it has all been apart previously and you may not be looking at factory washers anyway.

To work out if your 1.3mm washers are OK (I guess so), measure 2 washers + the banjo and subtract the length of the banjo bolt under the head to the end of the thread. As long the answer (ie, how far the bolt will go into the housing) is at least the same as the diameter of the bolt you are all good, probably even a little less is OK as these are hollow bolts anyway.

On 6/1/2022 at 8:39 AM, proline said:

I'm in the process of swapping out my OEM turbos for GT2859s

There are a bunch of M12 & M14 & M18 copper washers for the oil and water lines.

Can anyone tell me the correct/OEM thickness for these?

The washers I have removed are 1mm thick and I assume that is more or less the same before they were originally tightened i.e. the crush is negligible.

The replacements I have are 1.3mm thick.

Not sure if the loss of bolt thread contact is an issue or not, especially for the banjo bolts that attach directly to the turbos.

I'm tempted to anneal the original washers but for some reason that doesn't feel right.

I'm probably over thinking but would value anyone's thoughts.

Would also like to understand why Nissan used two washers connected together for the Turbo oil inlet.

 

Thanks

Lee

https://nissan.epc-data.com/skyline/bnr34/3957-rb26dett/engine/144/15188A/

Looking at the diagrams I don't see double washers. That sounds like an oil leak waiting to happen. The only exception is certain cases where there is a lock washer (split ring) and a flat washer.

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

The thickness difference you mention is negligible. As was said above, the connecting part is for ease of installation rather than needing to hold the inside washer in place while trying to line it up. New pipes with already attached banjo bolts sometimes have a plastic retainer that you rip off once you get the threads started. 

 

They're not that specific, just make sure they're thick enough to actually be crushed and not too thick that it reduces the thread engagement - both unlikely. So just get your diameters right and tighten it up. 

Oh and copper washers should not be doubled up. 

  • Like 1
On 02/06/2022 at 9:40 AM, proline said:

So the two connected washers I'm talking about are labelled 15192F in the 3rd diagram on the page linked to in the response above. The OEM part number is 1518913C00. The two washers sit either side of a banjo but are connected by a strip of copper. As I said above this is for the oil inlet banjo bolt attached directly to the turbo (i.e the where a HKS 0.8mm restrictor bolt would go if needed) not the water/oil tube adapter that bolts to the turbo.

I've measured the amount of thread that will go into the housing and it is 5mm with the 1mm thick OEM washers and only 4.4mm with the new washers. The banjo bolt is M12 - hence my concern.

I've attached a photo to help explain the above showing the OEM washer and the thread depth with the new washers.

Love this forum. As someone who has zero access to GTR expertise and no mechanical background I find the posts here invaluable - thanks.

Lee

IMG_20220602_001500[2].jpg

Just to add, that does not look like the correct banjo bolt. Not a washer issue, that bolt looks too short

  • Like 1

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

On 6/2/2022 at 5:59 AM, proline said:

Thanks for all the replies - very useful.

That's definitely the correct banjo bolt. I've attached a picture of mine and the bolt indicated from the parts page linked to above.

It seems to me to have very little thread engagement but I assume Nissan know what they are doing and it hasn't leaked in the 22 years I have owned the car 🙂

A reduction of 0.6mm (2 x washers x 0.3mm) may not be significant for most bolts but I'm concerned that it is a relatively large amount for a bolt with such little thread engagement.

I'm leaning towards trying to source some 1mm thick washers or annealing the originals but would really appreciate any other comments.

 

OEM Banjo bolt.jpg

Banjo Bolt.jpg

Have you considered buying the OEM part? Seems to be pretty cheap.

"Seems to be pretty cheap."

Not where I'm based it's not especially when postage is thrown in. The M12 x 18 x 1mm spec washers are pretty rare here - they all tend to be 1.5mm or rubbish quality. Its seems though that that spec is used by some of the motorcycle manufacturers as OEM equipment and I have found a supplier so it looks like that's how I will proceed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, does anyone know how I can, or can a moderator remove this advertisement please.  Has been sold a long time ago and would like to remove references. Thanks. 
    • There are adaptors that allow you to delete the booster and use an s15 clutch master cylinder.    if you want to keep the booster they are still available brand new 
    • I visited again today: It would appear they have painted the main body of the car and some parts of some of the panels, so I can say that I now have BMW parts in my car, much to the envy of @Dose Pipe Sutututu It is still covered in dust which is quite the tease but I did look at a few circumspect spots that will be behind bumpers and such and wiped some dust away: After my repeated begging to PLEASE DONT PAINT OVER THE ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE (you have to re-engineer the entire car if they do) I see THIS: Which is great. Excellent job tbh at least to me. A better non dusty example would be the backs of the doors that have been painted: Giving a reasonable contrast between old and new (I know the old isn't clear coated on the inside of doors). The door card will well and truly cover where the old paint is, you can see in the second pic some of the black butyl/whatever shit is sticking the plastic sheet behind the door transfer that has happened since it's clearly been stuck back on. The most maddening thing about this colour is every time I saw it in the wild it looks like another colour, same with photos of many cars with the same colour looking wildly different in every photo anybody ever takes and this is no exception. But stand a little further back and it suddenly looks dark AF. I did tell them when I was discussing which of the 70 million charcoal colours to choose from (a porsche one, a BMW one, or a R32 GTR one etc) that if they just ignored me and chose one at random I would probably never notice. Maybe they did. But the colour is supposed to be B39 (BMW Mineral Gray). Boring I know, but the R34 sedan (to me) really shows off it's boat-ness when you paint it in a bright colour like bayside blue or white or whatever else. I do have a fondness for AR2 Nissan Red, but decided against that because it'll have pretty odd contrast to random bits unpainted (like engine bay, bits of trim etc, and maybe it'll fade). And people will always fkin comment on AR2. Everything remains super dusty. I have tracking numbers for the new heads, as well as some Improved Racing goodies, but they probably will be a next year thing by the time they end up on the car. I did some maths on the heads and I know why nobody goes to this extent in Australia, because it's really not worth it, given I could have just CNC'ed my current heads, bought a FAST102/TB and used my current rocker/spring/cam combination and get a 383 stroker (or stroked a 6.0 GenIV bottom end to 6.6L) built for the same price of just the setup in the mail/on the floor here. Or I could have bought a LS3 and a Drysump system. And then have a complete engine to sell. Oh well
    • We just disconnected the vacuum line if I remember correctly, booster is still there. Is there a rebuild solution for the booster or a different adapter that will work for GTR chassis?
    • Yeah 4wd (boosted) has a recess in the firewall for the booster, and 2wd is flat - the example in the link shows the flat surface. When you deleted the booster, did you just attach the factory slave cylinder directly to the recess in the firewall with no adaption?  
×
×
  • Create New...