Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Never heard of this company Grex, and it seems to me that 2.7 is done more by bore than stroke (cant rember stock rb26 bore).

From a recent discussion on another forum i understood that a 2.7 wont give that much extra power really, but if you are doing it to keep safe then it would be good.

but grex..... hope they are not releates to MotoRex in the usa

That price is just for the pistons, doesnt include the conrods or crankshaft that come in the higher priced ($10,000+) kits.

And yes, Grex is Greddy is Trust etc. They are the same company, but technically they are different.

is it worth the price tag

http://turbulence.com.au/shop/product_info...products_id=135

i thoguht they would be more expensive then that, can anyone confirm if the kit is any good

MrChams is running the Trust 2.7 kit in his R32

I sure am... there are different kits from what I understand.

The kit that I have is 87.5mm GREX pistons and GREX H pattern rods.

The larger 2.7ltr piston kit helps my Greddy T78 spool up quicker.

Due to the cost of after market cranks, I am running a standard crank that has been shot penned and cryogenically treated (dunno what the hell that is but hey...)

The standard cranks are pretty strong. Before my rebuild this crank held 720hp with no signs of breaking. Not sure what there limit is.

I'm still running in the engine. Once I have it tuned I'll let you all know how I went for power.

The kit on the link above is just the over sized 87mm piston kit.

MrChams is running the Trust 2.7 kit in his R32

This is not the stroker kit.

The piston size makes it 2.7ltr.

My pistons are 87.5mm not 86.5mm. Typo

If you check out this link, you can calculate the displacement

http://www.benedict.esu7.org/sblock/ccfrm.html

It's something like this (don't quote me on it)

Bore radius squared x pi x stroke x no. of cyl = Total cubic displacement

How do you get the extra stroke necessary for 2.7L from a standard crank and 86.5mm pistons? :confused:
I sure am... there are different kits from what I understand.

The kit that I have is 87.5mm GREX pistons and GREX H pattern rods.

The larger 2.7ltr piston kit helps my Greddy T78 spool up quicker.

 

I'm still running in the engine. Once I have it tuned I'll let you all know how I went for power.

how much difference? Just outta interest.

And running in an engine? Thats over-rated in this day and age

Ahhh okay...

Std bore & stroke (86x73.7) = 2568cc (juuuuuust enough to claim 2.6 Litres :P)

87.5mm bore & std stroke = 2659cc (also juuuuuuuuuuust enough to claim 2.7 Litres :))

Did you do these internal upgrades by themselves? Could you really tell the effects of extra 100cc capacity? Or did you do other things like camshafts, cam gears, etc etc at the same time?

The stoke on the trust piston is 75.7mm and the piston size is 87.5.

http://www.benedict.esu7.org/sblock/ccfrm.html

Regarding the mods etc,

It's not just the pistons that has given the improvement but extensive head work.

The head work included modifying the bowl shape, different angles on the valves and valve chamber, valve guide modified, cam area opened for bigger cams and the obvious port enlargement.

I am currently running the standard cams with adjustable cam gears.

Bigger cams will be fitted soon once I decide what size to get.

Yes, I did notice the difference. The engine does feel like it has more down low torque but I can't say till we tune it on the dyno.

Ahhh okay...

Std bore & stroke (86x73.7) = 2568cc (juuuuuust enough to claim 2.6 Litres :P)

87.5mm bore & std stroke = 2659cc (also juuuuuuuuuuust enough to claim 2.7 Litres :))

Did you do these internal upgrades by themselves? Could you really tell the effects of extra 100cc capacity? Or did you do other things like camshafts, cam gears, etc etc at the same time?

I don't agree with not running in an engine.

My mechanic use to work for Nissan Japan.

They did test on how to run in RB engines. He told me that the best result was when they ran the engine up to 4,000rpm for the 1st 1,500km then oil change then up to 5,000rpm to 5,000km.

He told me the bore was perfect after such a run in.

The test also involved using mineral based oil in some engines and full-synthetic in other engines.

The full-synthetic oil run engines came out much better.

how much difference? Just outta interest.

And running in an engine? Thats over-rated in this day and age

The price is very high just for Greddy pistons.

You should be able to get the pistons for approx $2500 and the rods for approx the same, $2500...

damn, when i saw the pic and the price i already got the credit card out, but for pistons only hm doesnt seem worth it,
The stoke on the trust piston is 75.7mm and the piston size is 87.5.

http://www.benedict.esu7.org/sblock/ccfrm.html

How exactly do you increase stroke by 2mm with a piston upgrade on standard crank? :confused:

And I don't need a web calculator, I remember my Year 7 volumetric formulas :Oops: Probably the first time I've used them since high school :)

They did test on how to run in RB engines. He told me that the best result was when they ran the engine up to 4,000rpm for the 1st 1,500km then oil change then up to 5,000rpm to 5,000km.

 

He told me the bore was perfect after such a run in.

The test also involved using mineral based oil in some engines and full-synthetic in other engines.

The full-synthetic oil run engines came out much better.

5000km run-in??? That would take most people 6 months to complete. You really think that's a feasible run-in time?

What engine parts could POSSIBLY need 5000kms bedding in time??? :uhh:

No comment on the full-synthetic running in oil use... People have different ideas on that one, but the vast majority believe that mineral oil for the first 1000kms or so is still the best way to go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi Yes we're a bit optimistic we might get something out of sealing up the two pipes of the external wastegate and reactivating the stock one. I believe the orginal stock wastegate was tack welded shut. It doesn't budge and visually looks closed and sealed. The car has noticeably more lag so it could be at least part of the problem, maybe all. It's definately one of the key changes made since last tune. And it's one that's more difficult to fully understand and measure, not like for instance timing or cylinder compression.  Thanks for that feedback, we'll let you know how this progresses. Fingers crossed.   Regards Rob
    • Transplanting the vvt from a 25neo into an rb26?
    • Well, I was going to say, "Is the wastegate set up so that it is not leaking?" That's actually a different thing to what you're asking about. In theory, if you have allowed the two halves of the manifold to commmunicate (more than the stock manifold does - which is at least a little bit) then the negative effect should be apparent in delayed spool, not in outrigth power. OK, maybe just maybe, a badly set up twin scroll wastegate "crosstalk" might kill the top end, although it's hard to see how. What is happening with the original wastegate in the turbo? is it sealed off properly. If it's left flapping in the breeze, it will f**k everything up. If it is still there, and can be returned to service, I'd be capping off the external (presuming the two halves can and will be isolated from each other after doing so) and have a go with just the stock wastegate. I have an internal wastegate in my highflowed rear housing. The bigger opening and flapper should be fine to >250 rwkW. So there's not exactly a pressing reason to have the external. Done right, an external will give better results. Done wrong, it might just be possible to have worse results. Report back!
    • Hi Rob It's a nistune ecu. Yes same shop, good reputation. Apparently the computer on the dyno is compensated for temperature.    Chris was saying that the lean or richness of the mixture would be covered in the actual tune, but he's already picking up in advance that it's under what it should be. Regards the dyno, it's also noticeable on the road. But I just want to add something that has just come in, it appears there might be something in the setup of the external wastegate. In the exhaust manifold there is a centre divider between the front three and rear three cylinders. The external wastegate has a pipe from each side that join at the wastegate. Theory is those two pipes just might be pypassing that divider and introducing a problem somehow. Is anyone familiar with the divider in the exhaust manifold and the effects if the two wastegate pipes were to create a bypass path? Thanks for your questions Rob, interested in your thoughts on this external wastegate bypass theory. Regards Rob
×
×
  • Create New...