Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK can someone tell me what the two rb26 kits are rated at on this site i think its 800ps for the frist one and 1200ps for the next is correct and are these figures at the wheels or engine

http://xspeed.dreamhost.com/catalog/produc...products_id=330

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you might find that it's not just the crank that gives the extra stoke but also the combination of the piston height and conrod length.

The displacement was messured and was found to be just over 2.7ltr.

I'll have to check whether my rods a standard length or not.

Regarding compression, both my head and deck where milled to accomodate the setup the mechanic is seeking.

I think you will find that it is the crank, and crank only that affects stroke. Pistons suited to stroker cranks will measure less form gudgeon pin to crown to avoid making contact with the head / valves and meeting the desired level of compression. If you have a standard crank and you increase the rod length by say 2mm, the piston will travel 2mm higher at tdc (and would require either a sandwhcih plate or very thick head gasket) but remember it wll also be 2mm higher at bdc. Using your volumetric equation the capacity will remain unchanged. It appears with the kit you have purchased that your gain in capacity is due to the O/S pistons only.

A couple of useless things on Jap stroker kits

1) they all use the standard length rod

2) the difference in the "cheap" low horsepower kit vs the "expensive" high power kit is mainly the pin size(21mm std vs 22mm "SPL").

3) Merli's running big block chev pistons in his new motor to give him a displacement of 8 liters.

Fact or fiction?

Goddammit DoughBoy, you weren't meant to tell everyone that! RB80 > RB30 with RB26 Head :wassup:

And MrCharms, I only resort to smart-ass comments when I have to repeat myself 4 times, only to be ignored blindly and be replied to with completely wrong information over and over again.

There's only so many times I can try to tell you what's really going on with your engine (based on information you've supplied to me), before I give up and try to take the piss hs.gif

In any case, refer to my volumetric measurements on the first page, you're making just over 2650cc, which bumps you up to 2.7 Litres :D

P.S. If you sat down for a minute before replying and visualised what goes on in a piston engine, you'd quickly realise that crankshaft design is the ONLY thing that will effect stroke length. It's pretty simple when you think about it :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They're so beautiful 😍
    • Early last week, I became concerned that the car was feeling....slow. Most of my driving is commuting to/from work and there are few opportunities to get up it and convincingly make boost/power. It drives in vacuum almost all the time. But when you do occasionally get an opportunity, and.... it takes a little longer to start making power, and then there's not as much as you'd expect, and then you run out of road anyway and have to bottle out - it can be hard to be convinced that there's something wrong. But by the end of the week I was pretty convinced. Made an effort to get a decent test run. Took bloody forever to come up on boost and when it did it would only make about 50 kPa of pressure. There was no black smoke, no noise of a boost or exhaust leak, no evidence anywhere of an intercooler hose clamp being sloppy enough to let air escape. So.... not that sort of problem. Brainstorming led to thinking that the boost controller's solenoid might have failed in some way. No active boost control would just give wastegate pressure, which I was more or less getting, and the laggy behaviour could just be "normal" shitty boost response from an uncontrolled highflow. But a little extra 3rd party brainstorming led to the thought that the actuator circlip might have jumped off leaving me with a bluetooth wastegate. So, on Friday, off comes the stock heatshield (which is an annoying enough job on its own) to reveal - yup. WG is wide open. And.... it won't come back. It is jammed in the dump. Put the rod back on with a new circlip and tried driving it to get it hot in the hope that the capture was from thermal effects having been blown into the dump when hot and since cooled. Nope. Won't move, even with screwdriver mediated force when hot. Ran out of time to play. Came back to it yesterday. Unbolted the dump. Was lying under it with the dump jammed up against my guts undoing the bottom 2 bolts. Got them most of the way out and gave the dump a serious heave. It didn't noticeably move, but there was a satisfying "plink" noise from up to. Shuffle out and sure enough, gate is now closed. Nevermind that there was still the better part of an hour after that required to put it all back together. f**ken cars.
    • For your application, where you'll be at that 1/2" size or perhaps larger, yeah, excellent. Although not if you need a tight bending radius anywhere, because the corrugated stuff is not anywhere near as flexible as rubber/teflon cored stuff. But for turbo oil lines? No. Too big. They just don't do the corro stuff down at the ~1/4" ID size that you'd want, and if they did the OD of it would probably be a bit too fat for fitting it into the tight spaces available. I use hoses like that all the time for fuel gases (LPG, NG) and liquid fuels (HFO, diesels, waste oils). When we did the London Olympic cauldron, with the 204 individual burners on it, we had miles of the stuff (although a lot of that was teflon core). A bunch of that crap is still cluttering up the workshop, more than 12 years later!
    • Would something like this be an option  https://processhose.com/products/configurable-metal-hoses/1-2-in-t316-stainless-steel-annular-corrugated-configurable-flexible-metal-hose-assembly-with-ends-t304-single-braid-masterflex-af5550.html I'm looking at this for replacing the OEM EGR when installing a aftermarket intake plenum 
    • The once piece tail shafts with cv type joints on either end are the ones that end up vibrating and the vibration is caused by the cv joint binding as it turns, I’ve also seen them explode from the binding 
×
×
  • Create New...