Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I drive mine weekly(when its working haha) and sometimes to work. The loud car in the carpark is already a thing, idling it would be the next amusement for people. Also who wants to stay at work longer than they have to. 

 

*off to understand oil pre-heaters ....google time. 

On 23/7/2022 at 12:57 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I can't imagine idling a car for 10 minutes any time I want to go somewhere but I'm not really the target audience for a billet block anyways.

It’s not that hard to waste 10 minutes. Start the car, open the garage, move the car that’s in front of it, remove bollards, check oil temperature gauge and you’ll be pretty close 

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Hardness is really not an indicator of compressive or tensile strength. It is somewhat inversely proportional to toughness in that harder materials are usually more brittle. This is one of the key complaints I have with the idea of hardness testing cast iron blocks to determine how "good" they are.

Further, just because there is a different proportion of a given element in a cast iron (yes, iron, not steel) doesn't necessarily mean that any of the mechanical properties of the resulting cast iron will scale up and down in the same direction as the mechanical properties of the element. One of the whole points of alloys is that the alloying elements often to interesting and unexpected things when combined into the crystal matrix. Nevertheless, pure metallic nickel is about 1000 Brinell and typical grey cast irons are about 250 Brinell. So, Ni is not softer than cast iron. Addition of nickel can close on double the hardness of cast irons - if hardness is what you are after. The problem is that nickel is also used to increase high temperature resistance of cast irons, and when you do so, it tends to decrease the hardness. So ask yourself....why would Nissan add more Ni to the cast iron spec for the N1 block?

I would suggest that hardness is not necessarily the most desirable property of a cast iron in an engine block application. Tensile strength and toughness would be higher on the list. Tensile strength only inasmuch as it contributes to the stiffness of the finished casting. The properties relating to castability (how it flows, etc) would likely also be higher. Vibration resistance is an inherent property of cast iron that you would not likely choose to reduce.

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

Well, with a billet block being made from aluminium alloys, like 6061, which is only around 100 Brinell. So....

On 7/26/2022 at 1:23 PM, Butters said:

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

At one point Mr Dodge made a comment on his page saying that the N1 blocks are worst than 05U's. 

I asked an open question simply from curiosity and wanting to learn, for every handful of N1's or 05U's how many of them crack he got angry and messaged me in a split second demanding I don't ask baited questions 

The N1 block was made for cars competing in the N1 Endurance racing series, with a budget to go top level racing so surely some thought went into it regarding what material to use or input of someone clued up. 

If you goto a place that has build hundreds of 26's and you want high power likely they spec an N1 block.   

There are a few guys who have had a PRP brace on 05U's and ended up with exterior cracks, how well the brace helps a brand new 05U block though, perhaps there's some merit to it.  When I went to build my engine, given an 05U $3500 plus $1500 Brace plus machining plus shop labour, fitting your not really too far off a N1 block price.  

 

Edited by RB335
  • Like 1

Yes @GTSBoy iron, sorry not sure what was going on in my brain.  Thanks for your reply, good info. 

I thought iron was 4.5 on Mohs and Nickel 4, making it slightly less hard. Appreciate that is considered a less reliable way of measuring hardness. 

On 7/26/2022 at 9:26 PM, khezz said:

The main lesson in that video is that RB30 is king. $500 a through. Stronger, harder, stiffer and there is no replacement for displacement. 

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

  • Like 1
On 27/7/2022 at 4:44 AM, PLYNX said:

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

Love those old F1 videos. Those drivers had balls. 
 

displacement is still king. All 3 of the 6 second gtrs in Australia use 3.2l engines not 2.6l

Don’t know about money. It’s just easier with a 3.2. Look at top fuellers. They use the biggest displacement allowed. No shortage of cash there or brains. But it’s just easier with a bigger motor. 

  • 6 months later...

So this was a fun watch.

Seems a lot of value in an N1 block over a standard, specially for the power levels that are not going to split bores(1200 + ?) .

It does make you really question the value of a brace.

 

 

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

23 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

He has stated in previous video that the brace was built for 4wd adaptions. Then they noticed blocks crack less. Yes walk is it's feature but also this from the PRP site. 

"Aftermarket diffs crack blocks! it’s a fact, the Platinum Block brace will not only stop block twist, but stops the diff snapping the block under load, energy is dissipated through your 40mm thick integrated and webbed brace, blocks cracking and snapping become a thing of the past!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...