Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I’ve ordered all the good fruits for my stock rb25 neo stagea (turbo, manifold & intake) will get haltech and fuel management done by tuners, but there’s one thing I don’t know anything about which is the stock AFM. My goal is atleast 300 KW atws.

Basically do I need to upgrade my AFM to like a Z32 or can I just get a MAF delete. Unless the haltech ecu controls the airflow data on its own? 🤷‍♂️ lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/483847-do-i-need-a-afm-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Haltech can run an AFM, can't it? It just happens to have an onboard MAP sensor in the ECU it can use instead.

I'm not sure where the standard AFM runs out of resolution, maybe around 250kw? If you are using the standard intake just leave it there, plugged in or not if you are using MAP.

 

An AFM is better than a MAP sensor at lower boost loads as it deals with temperature and altitude differences better, but a MAP can be simpler when you are making a custom intake or using big boost levels where the AFM runs out of resolution.

  • Like 2
On 7/12/2022 at 5:57 AM, SLIXK said:

I’ve ordered all the good fruits for my stock rb25 neo stagea (turbo, manifold & intake) will get haltech and fuel management done by tuners, but there’s one thing I don’t know anything about which is the stock AFM. My goal is atleast 300 KW atws.

Basically do I need to upgrade my AFM to like a Z32 or can I just get a MAF delete. Unless the haltech ecu controls the airflow data on its own? 🤷‍♂️ lol

For a single throttle body there's no real need for a MAF. Haltech Elite supports both. If you want to keep the MAF in place to help you tune though that can help quite a lot with part throttle setup. At steady state in a load cell you can empirically derive volumetric efficiency with a MAF. GM's ECUs can use this data to help with transient throttle too.

  • Like 1
On 7/13/2022 at 7:56 AM, Duncan said:

Haltech can run an AFM, can't it? It just happens to have an onboard MAP sensor in the ECU it can use instead.

I'm not sure where the standard AFM runs out of resolution, maybe around 250kw? If you are using the standard intake just leave it there, plugged in or not if you are using MAP.

 

An AFM is better than a MAP sensor at lower boost loads as it deals with temperature and altitude differences better, but a MAP can be simpler when you are making a custom intake or using big boost levels where the AFM runs out of resolution.

 

On 7/13/2022 at 8:12 AM, joshuaho96 said:

For a single throttle body there's no real need for a MAF. Haltech Elite supports both. If you want to keep the MAF in place to help you tune though that can help quite a lot with part throttle setup. At steady state in a load cell you can empirically derive volumetric efficiency with a MAF. GM's ECUs can use this data to help with transient throttle too.

I have been wanting to use an AFM/MAF with a Haltech to see what can be achieved as tuning supercharged Gen 4 LS based stuff makes the drivability and economy pretty good using AFM and Map based VE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
    • Running rich in conditions where it shouldn't probably won't do great things for catalytic converter lifespan. I would fix that sooner than later.
    • Yes, important point. Watch the Motive videos with Herman thickness testing the bores and deck. You do not want to push the unlucky (thin) block as hard as you can push the average block.
×
×
  • Create New...