Jump to content
SAU Community

rb25de neo vs rb25det neo ecu harness


Recommended Posts

this may be an obvious question but does anyone know if the connection point to the rb25 NA neo is the same as the rb25det neo? i assume they are but couldnt fimd aything on the forum and i want to get the RB25DET NEO TO RB25 S1 S2 ECU Patch Harness instead of spending the extra 1k. if theres any other connections id need to add to the ecu any info would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both r34 ecu connectors are the same.

Easiest way is to just have both looms out laid out, both wiring diagrams and remove what is not needed on r34 loom then get new plugs and wire up whats required to r32 body plugs so its complete plugin. If using the standard r34 ecu.

Are you wanting to run the Neo on a non-Neo ecu? Injectors, coils, IACV and CAS are all wired different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also im trying to use the rb25 neo with the adapter for the rb25 neo to the rb25det on my 1992 r32. and im using a link ecu froma rb25 and i have a s1 head and will be using non neo  Injectors, coils, IACV and CAS are all wired different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Essentially everything is non neo so no need for Neo loom then. Change plugs required on r32 loom which is easy.

Anything additional can br wired and program changes in the link ecu and be fine.

I started with a link plugin and factory loom in my sil80 before going an xtreme and custom loom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i only have the rb25 neo loom i bought an adapter from wiring specialists to fit an rb25 ecu is the neo loom practically useless? or can i still use it as a rb25 s1 loom with some wire added on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2022 at 5:01 AM, eli995 said:

i only have the rb25 neo loom i bought an adapter from wiring specialists to fit an rb25 ecu is the neo loom practically useless? or can i still use it as a rb25 s1 loom with some wire added on?

Much of the Neo loom will be the same, but there are many differences. You will need to bell it out to make sure that the right ECU pins are going to right field devices, and many of them won't be. The Neo has different field devices (such as the boost sensor) using pins that are used for other things on the vanilla 25. You might end up having to take it apart in places to make it reach the devices it is supposed to, repin at the ECU end, etc etc.

You're going to need the entire R32 wiring diagram, so you know the body side wiring and how to integrate it into the engine loom, and you're going to need both the Neo and vanilla 25 wiring diagrams to find all the differences and straighten them out.

it would be far easier to piss off the adapter and just get a vanilla 25 loom. Far less bodging.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...