Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yuh, so while I'm usually the guy explaining how the speedo and related shit works, I recently experienced something which blew my mind and I can't think of how it happened. So, I'm casting it out to the braintrust to see if there's any reasonable explanation.

Here's the story. I drove the car (R32 GTSt, R33 turbo gearbox) away from home, and the first time I noticed the speedo was once I was out onto the 60km road about 1km and 5 turns from home. I'm doing maybe 60 km/h. The speedo is reading ~120 km/h. I'm all "WTF is this?".

I roll down the road and out onto the 80km section, where the speedo is gleefully telling me that I'm doing at least 150, even though I'm pretty sure I haven't even caught up to the mix of sheeple and mad dream boats doing anything from 70 to 100. I accelerate to see what happens and the speedo happily winds off the dial at 180.

I stop at some lights. Take off, and......the speedo is back to normal.

The brain is doing about 500 km/h trying to work out how this could come about. The R32 speedo is a cable drive. The connection is purely mechanical, right up until you get to the spinny magnet and drum bizzo in the speedo head. It's not like there could be an electronic fault that was double sensing rising and falling edges of the waveform or anything like that. The cup in the speedo head had to literally be getting dragged around against its spring with enough force to make it read about double what was really happening.

So, has anyone got any brainwaves as to what the bloody hell could cause that to happen in the real, actual, physical world?

 

The speedo drive was built from a Navara drive about 10 years ago when the car's big birthday transplants happened. The drive cable is only a few years old, having snapped after ~25 years of service. The back of the speedo housing is hale and hearty, no bits broken off IIRC.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484270-speedo-wtf-theories-please/
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Yuh, so while I'm usually the guy explaining how the speedo and related shit works, I recently experienced something which blew my mind and I can't think of how it happened. So, I'm casting it out to the braintrust to see if there's any reasonable explanation.

Here's the story. I drove the car (R32 GTSt, R33 turbo gearbox) away from home, and the first time I noticed the speedo was once I was out onto the 60km road about 1km and 5 turns from home. I'm doing maybe 60 km/h. The speedo is reading ~120 km/h. I'm all "WTF is this?".

I roll down the road and out onto the 80km section, where the speedo is gleefully telling me that I'm doing at least 150, even though I'm pretty sure I haven't even caught up to the mix of sheeple and mad dream boats doing anything from 70 to 100. I accelerate to see what happens and the speedo happily winds off the dial at 180.

I stop at some lights. Take off, and......the speedo is back to normal.

The brain is doing about 500 km/h trying to work out how this could come about. The R32 speedo is a cable drive. The connection is purely mechanical, right up until you get to the spinny magnet and drum bizzo in the speedo head. It's not like there could be an electronic fault that was double sensing rising and falling edges of the waveform or anything like that. The cup in the speedo head had to literally be getting dragged around against its spring with enough force to make it read about double what was really happening.

So, has anyone got any brainwaves as to what the bloody hell could cause that to happen in the real, actual, physical world?

 

The speedo drive was built from a Navara drive about 10 years ago when the car's big birthday transplants happened. The drive cable is only a few years old, having snapped after ~25 years of service. The back of the speedo housing is hale and hearty, no bits broken off IIRC.

Don't the R33 tachometers have a tendency to go completely crazy with age? Capacitors can lose their dielectric and basically turn themselves into a short circuit, dry joints intermittently making contact on inductive paths can pump up voltages beyond what's normal, etc. It's hard to say exactly what is causing it without really getting into the guts of it and reproducing/testing it but it's nothing beyond belief IMO.

9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Apples and donkeys. The R32 speedo is mechanical. How does a spinning magnet in a cup turn the cup twice as hard as it usually does?

I can still think of a number of weird things that can cause what you saw. It's basically just an inductor at the end of the day. RF interference might do it if nothing is wrong with the circuit. If something is wrong with the circuit flipping an inductor off and on with a smoothing capacitor connected to a load is basically a classic boost converter. The flipping of the inductor off and on to ground is usually supposed to be controlled by a transistor but in this case it could be literally anything. Tin whiskers, that kind of thing. Only way to verify is to get it on a bench and see if you can reproduce with known input signals.

I get where you're going. My understanding is the cable spinning has a direct influence on the needle via magnetism right ? But it has to overcome the needle zeroing retaining spring tension to move at all right ? Only way I can explain is something, somehow that spring tension changed / decreased when it was bugging out. If that was the case at a real almost 0km/h car not moving but cable still spinning scenario, the gauge would have been not at 0 and deflecting around.

Apart from that, fked if I know.

Have had a similar issue in an old HQ. Turned out the drive cable spring had failed, never cut it open to see exactly but was doing random speeds most of the time and close to normal once in a while. 

5 minutes ago, robbo_rb180 said:

Have had a similar issue in an old HQ. Turned out the drive cable spring had failed, never cut it open to see exactly but was doing random speeds most of the time and close to normal once in a while. 

Could also be this.

29 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It's not a circuit! It is a spinning magnet dragging around a metal cup. It is a physical device. There are no electronics involved.

It's still a circuit, just a really simple one. The metal cup is technically an inductor.

On 12/12/2022 at 9:11 PM, GTSBoy said:

I'd have to be driving underneath one of the UFOs from Close Encounters of the Third Kind for that sort of inductive interference!

Were you? Typically these threads end up in a wild goose chase then information like that comes out at the end that explains it all.

  • Haha 2
14 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

 

It's still a circuit, just a really simple one. The metal cup is technically an inductor.

I think he would argue its not a circuit - I would. A circuit would be current flowing through a conductor, an electrical connection between points. That's not what's happening here - there is no coil or wire with current flowing through it to move the needle, it's the eddy currents created purely by the magnet acting on the electrically conductive cup. Eddy currents do not flow in a circuit from start to end, they swirl around in a concentrated area in conductive material creating their own magnetic field.

Speedometer-diagram.thumb.webp.6aab3bbd46538982aadbbe11fed26b01.webp

That's why I mentioned the wound spring on the needle, which is a force to oppose this electromagnetism that moves the needle. If the force that moves the needle is correct, to me the.only way the needle to move further than intended is for the tension of the spring on the needle to decrease or slip allowing more movement.

That's the how a mechanical speedo needle could move more than intended, whether that's what's happening to this gauge, dunno.

just broscience brain here, somehow the speedo mechanism itself has been come overly magnetised from some huge inductor near by?

maybe it's 5G interference LOLOLOLOLOL... (this is a joke for anyone that thinks I am being serious).

  • Like 1

Yup, look for a mechanical fault around the hairspring assembly, it may have failed from age and causing the needle to read higher sometimes, or if there's debris or stuck grease around it.

Also UFOs do like to sight see around down undah so that's also a highly probable scenario. Don't know which part you're from but especially the coastlines around Western Australia are notorious for this. 👽

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, admS15 said:

Voodoo 

R32s definitely are cursed - broken speedo cables, a/c actuators that always stuff up, a/c vents made from plastic for maccas kids toys, interior door handles that turn to talcum powder, guaranteed dash clock deaths and the dreaded dash pad bubble.

2 hours ago, BK said:

R32s definitely are cursed - broken speedo cables, a/c actuators that always stuff up, a/c vents made from plastic for maccas kids toys, interior door handles that turn to talcum powder, guaranteed dash clock deaths and the dreaded dash pad bubble.

Sounds like you've described R33s too lol

43 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Sounds like you've described R33s too lol

No way ! Only thing I've ever had to do on that list in nearly 20 years on my 33 is the a/c vent mode selector actuator. None of those other things are an issue on a 33R generally but on the 32s it's almost guaranteed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...