Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I’m in the middle of restoring my R32 GTR and have heard that the stock g sensor under the center console is prone to age and uses antiquated technology. Has anybody used the Do Luck digital g sensor with any success? Or any recommendations?

I’m also curious if this unit would affect the stock ambient pressure in the attesa pump, because I would like to wire in a switch to the AWD fuse to go into RWD only on the fly, and I understand this only works with the R32 system that has no ambient pressure. Anybody can confirm?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484566-r32-gtr-do-luck-digital-g-sensor/
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weikleenget said:

Hi all, I’m in the middle of restoring my R32 GTR and have heard that the stock g sensor under the center console is prone to age and uses antiquated technology. Has anybody used the Do Luck digital g sensor with any success? Or any recommendations?

I’m also curious if this unit would affect the stock ambient pressure in the attesa pump, because I would like to wire in a switch to the AWD fuse to go into RWD only on the fly, and I understand this only works with the R32 system that has no ambient pressure. Anybody can confirm?

Thanks

The g-sensor of the R32 won't affect whether pulling the fuse disables the system. The R33 + R34 uses a failsafe solenoid to do what you're talking about.

the switch in an R32 prevents power transfer to the front, most of the time it is in RWD mode. R33's and R34's use a second solenoid to maintain residual pressure in the pump so that the power transfer is faster, hence why you can't just kill it by pulling the fuse or wiring a switch in-line with the fuse.

the G sensor's PWM is not the issue, the transfer of power to the front is mostly affected by the speed of the ATTESA pump... hence why in subsequent models they upgraded the pump system.

my personal opinion is that upgrading the G Sensor is snake oil and a waste of money. once you turn off the solenoid you have to restart the car to make it active again... which is not something you do in an ordinary driving situation. You'd only flick the switch to do skids, some drifting or warming up tyres for drag or a 2WD dyno. In all those scenarios the speed at which you disable ATTESA is irrelevant.

There are cheaper ways to intercept the PWM duty cycle from the sensor so it's not a permanent off till restart, these days you can use an Arduino for IO, about 20 years ago we used $50 circuit boards from JayCar. It's definitely not as exxy as $500+ for a Do-Luck unit.

15 hours ago, funkymonkey said:

the switch in an R32 prevents power transfer to the front, most of the time it is in RWD mode. R33's and R34's use a second solenoid to maintain residual pressure in the pump so that the power transfer is faster, hence why you can't just kill it by pulling the fuse or wiring a switch in-line with the fuse.

the G sensor's PWM is not the issue, the transfer of power to the front is mostly affected by the speed of the ATTESA pump... hence why in subsequent models they upgraded the pump system.

my personal opinion is that upgrading the G Sensor is snake oil and a waste of money. once you turn off the solenoid you have to restart the car to make it active again... which is not something you do in an ordinary driving situation. You'd only flick the switch to do skids, some drifting or warming up tyres for drag or a 2WD dyno. In all those scenarios the speed at which you disable ATTESA is irrelevant.

There are cheaper ways to intercept the PWM duty cycle from the sensor so it's not a permanent off till restart, these days you can use an Arduino for IO, about 20 years ago we used $50 circuit boards from JayCar. It's definitely not as exxy as $500+ for a Do-Luck unit.

The G-sensor is just a replacement for the old factory sensor. MEMS reacts faster and probably more accurately than the old sensor design. To my knowledge all it can do on top of that is fake the sensor response to make the ATTESA system think there is more or less friction coefficient on the road at any given moment to reduce or increase the AWD. People in my area have reported decent improvements to driveability in autocross so it's probably not a waste of money.

I dont know what the stock g-sensor is like because my car didnt come with one. The previous owner in japan already removed it. But i installed the doluck sensor and noticed the car handles noticeably better in AWD than in RWD. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...