Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm attempting to change the RMS whilst the gearbox is out. There seems to be two approaches i.e remove the retainer plate or not.


I intended to remove the plate and have already loosened the 6 bolts indicated by the red crosses in the photo but NOT the 4 oil pan bolts shown by the green crosses – therefore no attempt has been made to remove the plate.


If I re-torque the 6 bolts can I now proceed to remove the RMS using a seal puller or is the RTV sealing the retainer plate now compromised and therefore likely to leak?

RMS.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484577-rear-main-seal-rms/
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, proline said:

I'm attempting to change the RMS whilst the gearbox is out. There seems to be two approaches i.e remove the retainer plate or not.


I intended to remove the plate and have already loosened the 6 bolts indicated by the red crosses in the photo but NOT the 4 oil pan bolts shown by the green crosses – therefore no attempt has been made to remove the plate.


If I re-torque the 6 bolts can I now proceed to remove the RMS using a seal puller or is the RTV sealing the retainer plate now compromised and therefore likely to leak?

RMS.jpg

If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV then as long as you retorque it close to the original bolt tension it will be ok. If you tighten further it will squeeze the dry RTV out in a ribbon that will probably not seal as well.

  • Thanks 1

"If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV"

Would loosening the bolts have broken the seal given the 4 oil pan bolts were not touched and no attempt was made to lever the plate off? Fwiw the existing RTV does not appear to have hardened and is soft and pliant.

 

I don't know what the original torque was so would have to assume it was as per the workshop manual so 6.3-8.3 nm.

 

Would the safer option be to just remove the retainer plate and re-RTV. My concerns here are:

a) removing the plate because of the dowels and non-existent level points

b) sealing the plate to the oil pan because the seal will be dependent on new RTV sealing to old RTV in the corners (see blue arrows). I've seen videos of people doing this but obviously I don't know how long it lasted.

RMS.jpg

2 hours ago, proline said:

"If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV"

Would loosening the bolts have broken the seal given the 4 oil pan bolts were not touched and no attempt was made to lever the plate off? Fwiw the existing RTV does not appear to have hardened and is soft and pliant.

 

I don't know what the original torque was so would have to assume it was as per the workshop manual so 6.3-8.3 nm.

 

Would the safer option be to just remove the retainer plate and re-RTV. My concerns here are:

a) removing the plate because of the dowels and non-existent level points

b) sealing the plate to the oil pan because the seal will be dependent on new RTV sealing to old RTV in the corners (see blue arrows). I've seen videos of people doing this but obviously I don't know how long it lasted.

RMS.jpg

Loosening bolts will not break the seal on the RTV unless you smacked it with a lot of force while loose. If you actually go to try and pull it off you will discover it takes quite a lot of effort to break it loose. Start at 6.3 N-m and work up towards 7.3. Watch the RTV carefully to make sure you don't compress it past the original set as too far and you can break the bond loose and squeeze out the aforementioned ribbons. You want to stop before that happens. It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices. I would not try to seal new RTV to old RTV. I'm pretty sure it won't work. You don't need to go crazy with the fastener preload, RTV applied correctly is crazy strong and as long as the fasteners don't just back out it will be fine.

  • Thanks 1

Thanks for that.

"It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices."

If it starts to seep oil is it likely to be enough to cause any problems - will it be noticeable i.e drips on the garage floor?

What's your preferred method for pulling the seal. I'm torn between screws into the seal and the seal puller in the attached photo. I don't find inserting of the puller through the lip between the seal and the crankshaft a particularly appealing prospect.

 

puller.jpg

Unless you can't access the sump bolts, removing the retainer and doing it all on the bench, then cleaning and reapplying the sealant is probably easiest. You won't get one of those big pullers in with the crank there.

6 hours ago, proline said:

Thanks for that.

"It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices."

If it starts to seep oil is it likely to be enough to cause any problems - will it be noticeable i.e drips on the garage floor?

What's your preferred method for pulling the seal. I'm torn between screws into the seal and the seal puller in the attached photo. I don't find inserting of the puller through the lip between the seal and the crankshaft a particularly appealing prospect.

 

puller.jpg

When I let RTV set before doing full torque on my front diff cover it dripped enough to leave drops on the garage floor. That was with finger tight torque to set before tightening to spec. If you torque it too hard you will basically be doing what I did but hopefully less so. Are you doing this in the car? Only reason I can imagine why you are worried about removing the oil pan is that getting it off means dropping the front subframe and somehow supporting 500 pounds of engine without it smashing into your head.

One way that looks promising is to very, very carefully use a small drill bit to only drill the rubber. Do not put a lot of pressure into the drill, let the bit do the work for you. Then put a small screw into it that does not contact any critical surface and use that to help you pull it out like this: 

I recommend using a center punch as well before you drill. If you miss and have it offset don't try and drill anyways, try again and get a clean starting point for the drill bit. You can use a slide hammer on the screw once it's in or a pry tool if you can get the angles right. Do your best to clean out the swarf from the engine once you have it off.

  • Thanks 1
3 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

When I let RTV set before doing full torque on my front diff cover it dripped enough to leave drops on the garage floor. That was with finger tight torque to set before tightening to spec.

Realistically, that's a chalk and cheese comparison. His RTV will be set off completely squished as a nice thin film that should have changed not at all when the bolt torque was released and changed again not at all when torqued back up. It's not as if the two surfaces actually moved apart. There might have been a tiny amount of internal tension introduced into the RTV, but if it doesn't have enough compliance to handle that, it has no role being used for the things we use it for!

  • Thanks 1
2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

His RTV will be set off completely squished as a nice thin film that should have changed not at all when the bolt torque was released and changed again not at all when torqued back up.

That sounds encouraging. Would the age of the RTV have any bearing on this - I think it may be the original Nissan sealant but as I said above it still feels soft and pliant?

What would be your preferred method for removing the seal with engine still in car and retainer plate not removed?

11 hours ago, Duncan said:

Unless you can't access the sump bolts, removing the retainer and doing it all on the bench, then cleaning and reapplying the sealant is probably easiest.

That was my original intention. Do you think on re-istall of the retainer plate it will seal ok to the sump (there is no gasket) because at the corners (indicated by blue arrows in photo above) new RTV will be sealing over RTV?

9 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Absolutely. That is 100% how I would do it, you are 4 bolts away from making this job a million times easier for yourself.

That sounds good. I was told by a skyline "expert" that it would leak at the corners but they've been wrong before.

Have you actually done this yourself?

Do you have any tips for removing the plate?

No, I haven't done this before, I've always changed the rear main when I change the bearings :)

I do need to do it some time in the rb30 stagea, and that is how I plan to. There is no reason it will leak at the corners, just have a dab of extra sealant there; the whole point of silicone to seal is it retains some flex over it's life.

No tips required, undo the bolts and gently pry it off with a bar or flat screwdriver if it resists. The seal will slide over the crank. When you reseal it don't use too much silicone, a thin (3mm) bead is plenty 

  • Thanks 1
8 minutes ago, Duncan said:

a thin (3mm) bead is plenty

Exactly what the workshop manual says 🙂

I don't doubt your advice is correct but I'm interested to know how if you've never done this before you are 100% sure it won't leak - do you know others that have successfully used this approach?

mate, I understand you want certainty, especially because if it leaks it is box off again to fix.

but in the end, most jobs come down to fundamentals. In this case you have a factory designed, properly engineered  sealing system with a sealant designed to go in flexible, take up the required shape and then set firm but still flexible, with suitable bolts to hold the pressure on the sealant. you don't need to overthink this.

  • Thanks 1

What he^ said.

The fact that rear main seals frequently need to be changed during the service life of the engine and the desire to be able to do it without having to pull the engine/sump is the reason why the seal is retained the way that it is.

Just clean up the corners of where the retainer goes even more thoroughly than the rest of the job before putting the new sealant on.  And as said above, a little extra dab in the corners never hurts.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...