Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm attempting to change the RMS whilst the gearbox is out. There seems to be two approaches i.e remove the retainer plate or not.


I intended to remove the plate and have already loosened the 6 bolts indicated by the red crosses in the photo but NOT the 4 oil pan bolts shown by the green crosses – therefore no attempt has been made to remove the plate.


If I re-torque the 6 bolts can I now proceed to remove the RMS using a seal puller or is the RTV sealing the retainer plate now compromised and therefore likely to leak?

RMS.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484577-rear-main-seal-rms/
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, proline said:

I'm attempting to change the RMS whilst the gearbox is out. There seems to be two approaches i.e remove the retainer plate or not.


I intended to remove the plate and have already loosened the 6 bolts indicated by the red crosses in the photo but NOT the 4 oil pan bolts shown by the green crosses – therefore no attempt has been made to remove the plate.


If I re-torque the 6 bolts can I now proceed to remove the RMS using a seal puller or is the RTV sealing the retainer plate now compromised and therefore likely to leak?

RMS.jpg

If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV then as long as you retorque it close to the original bolt tension it will be ok. If you tighten further it will squeeze the dry RTV out in a ribbon that will probably not seal as well.

  • Thanks 1

"If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV"

Would loosening the bolts have broken the seal given the 4 oil pan bolts were not touched and no attempt was made to lever the plate off? Fwiw the existing RTV does not appear to have hardened and is soft and pliant.

 

I don't know what the original torque was so would have to assume it was as per the workshop manual so 6.3-8.3 nm.

 

Would the safer option be to just remove the retainer plate and re-RTV. My concerns here are:

a) removing the plate because of the dowels and non-existent level points

b) sealing the plate to the oil pan because the seal will be dependent on new RTV sealing to old RTV in the corners (see blue arrows). I've seen videos of people doing this but obviously I don't know how long it lasted.

RMS.jpg

2 hours ago, proline said:

"If you haven't broken the seal on the RTV"

Would loosening the bolts have broken the seal given the 4 oil pan bolts were not touched and no attempt was made to lever the plate off? Fwiw the existing RTV does not appear to have hardened and is soft and pliant.

 

I don't know what the original torque was so would have to assume it was as per the workshop manual so 6.3-8.3 nm.

 

Would the safer option be to just remove the retainer plate and re-RTV. My concerns here are:

a) removing the plate because of the dowels and non-existent level points

b) sealing the plate to the oil pan because the seal will be dependent on new RTV sealing to old RTV in the corners (see blue arrows). I've seen videos of people doing this but obviously I don't know how long it lasted.

RMS.jpg

Loosening bolts will not break the seal on the RTV unless you smacked it with a lot of force while loose. If you actually go to try and pull it off you will discover it takes quite a lot of effort to break it loose. Start at 6.3 N-m and work up towards 7.3. Watch the RTV carefully to make sure you don't compress it past the original set as too far and you can break the bond loose and squeeze out the aforementioned ribbons. You want to stop before that happens. It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices. I would not try to seal new RTV to old RTV. I'm pretty sure it won't work. You don't need to go crazy with the fastener preload, RTV applied correctly is crazy strong and as long as the fasteners don't just back out it will be fine.

  • Thanks 1

Thanks for that.

"It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices."

If it starts to seep oil is it likely to be enough to cause any problems - will it be noticeable i.e drips on the garage floor?

What's your preferred method for pulling the seal. I'm torn between screws into the seal and the seal puller in the attached photo. I don't find inserting of the puller through the lip between the seal and the crankshaft a particularly appealing prospect.

 

puller.jpg

Unless you can't access the sump bolts, removing the retainer and doing it all on the bench, then cleaning and reapplying the sealant is probably easiest. You won't get one of those big pullers in with the crank there.

6 hours ago, proline said:

Thanks for that.

"It will still seal but not as well, it can start seeping oil as oil works its way through the crevices."

If it starts to seep oil is it likely to be enough to cause any problems - will it be noticeable i.e drips on the garage floor?

What's your preferred method for pulling the seal. I'm torn between screws into the seal and the seal puller in the attached photo. I don't find inserting of the puller through the lip between the seal and the crankshaft a particularly appealing prospect.

 

puller.jpg

When I let RTV set before doing full torque on my front diff cover it dripped enough to leave drops on the garage floor. That was with finger tight torque to set before tightening to spec. If you torque it too hard you will basically be doing what I did but hopefully less so. Are you doing this in the car? Only reason I can imagine why you are worried about removing the oil pan is that getting it off means dropping the front subframe and somehow supporting 500 pounds of engine without it smashing into your head.

One way that looks promising is to very, very carefully use a small drill bit to only drill the rubber. Do not put a lot of pressure into the drill, let the bit do the work for you. Then put a small screw into it that does not contact any critical surface and use that to help you pull it out like this: 

I recommend using a center punch as well before you drill. If you miss and have it offset don't try and drill anyways, try again and get a clean starting point for the drill bit. You can use a slide hammer on the screw once it's in or a pry tool if you can get the angles right. Do your best to clean out the swarf from the engine once you have it off.

  • Thanks 1
3 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

When I let RTV set before doing full torque on my front diff cover it dripped enough to leave drops on the garage floor. That was with finger tight torque to set before tightening to spec.

Realistically, that's a chalk and cheese comparison. His RTV will be set off completely squished as a nice thin film that should have changed not at all when the bolt torque was released and changed again not at all when torqued back up. It's not as if the two surfaces actually moved apart. There might have been a tiny amount of internal tension introduced into the RTV, but if it doesn't have enough compliance to handle that, it has no role being used for the things we use it for!

  • Thanks 1
2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

His RTV will be set off completely squished as a nice thin film that should have changed not at all when the bolt torque was released and changed again not at all when torqued back up.

That sounds encouraging. Would the age of the RTV have any bearing on this - I think it may be the original Nissan sealant but as I said above it still feels soft and pliant?

What would be your preferred method for removing the seal with engine still in car and retainer plate not removed?

11 hours ago, Duncan said:

Unless you can't access the sump bolts, removing the retainer and doing it all on the bench, then cleaning and reapplying the sealant is probably easiest.

That was my original intention. Do you think on re-istall of the retainer plate it will seal ok to the sump (there is no gasket) because at the corners (indicated by blue arrows in photo above) new RTV will be sealing over RTV?

9 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Absolutely. That is 100% how I would do it, you are 4 bolts away from making this job a million times easier for yourself.

That sounds good. I was told by a skyline "expert" that it would leak at the corners but they've been wrong before.

Have you actually done this yourself?

Do you have any tips for removing the plate?

No, I haven't done this before, I've always changed the rear main when I change the bearings :)

I do need to do it some time in the rb30 stagea, and that is how I plan to. There is no reason it will leak at the corners, just have a dab of extra sealant there; the whole point of silicone to seal is it retains some flex over it's life.

No tips required, undo the bolts and gently pry it off with a bar or flat screwdriver if it resists. The seal will slide over the crank. When you reseal it don't use too much silicone, a thin (3mm) bead is plenty 

  • Thanks 1
8 minutes ago, Duncan said:

a thin (3mm) bead is plenty

Exactly what the workshop manual says 🙂

I don't doubt your advice is correct but I'm interested to know how if you've never done this before you are 100% sure it won't leak - do you know others that have successfully used this approach?

mate, I understand you want certainty, especially because if it leaks it is box off again to fix.

but in the end, most jobs come down to fundamentals. In this case you have a factory designed, properly engineered  sealing system with a sealant designed to go in flexible, take up the required shape and then set firm but still flexible, with suitable bolts to hold the pressure on the sealant. you don't need to overthink this.

  • Thanks 1

What he^ said.

The fact that rear main seals frequently need to be changed during the service life of the engine and the desire to be able to do it without having to pull the engine/sump is the reason why the seal is retained the way that it is.

Just clean up the corners of where the retainer goes even more thoroughly than the rest of the job before putting the new sealant on.  And as said above, a little extra dab in the corners never hurts.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't do it if your gearbox box has already having syncro issues. The short hifter will put a greater load on them. If you must I remember Nismo did a shorter shifter, with the top part being physically shorter and the part that went into the gearbox was the same as stock. In saying that I've had a C's short shifter (I think) in mine for many years, which was given to me as the previous owner was not sympathetic to the gearbox. Thus forwarned I was careful and had to modify my normal changing style. You have to be super accurate with your clutch and shifts
    • Well, after a week of daily driving and having to crawl out between the wheel and the side intrusion bars. I got myself a quick release setup. I went with an NRG short hub and Quick Release with some cute heart cutouts on the pull tabs. Nice and matchy matchy with the rest of the interior accents I have going on.  The only downside is the total stack height even with the short adapter is longer than the old HKB boss kit. Luckily I had some adjustment left on the column so move the wheel away.
    • stock shifter with new bushes, springs and cup will improve it. Gktech do all the bits. The opinion as the years have gone on is the redline is not great in old gearboxes.
    • Hi all   what short shifter do you use on your skykine r34?   my synchronous does have a problem and i was getting huge delay and grinding sound between 2nd and 3rd, did put shockproof red heavy stuff and it is great now/ no issues   would in your view short shifter screw this up?   people seems to suggest/ use cube short shifter and there is standard and premium. Seen review of premium as much better and less play. Thoughts?
    • Yeah, there's a bit of a density and friability difference between pebbles and any of those other things. Silicone will definitely float in oil and so will be mobile enough to move around. Although, again, if it is upstream of the filter it really shouldn't go any further. I would only ever worry about silicone when it is in places downstream of the filter. Upstream of the pickup is a whole 'nother matter. We've all seen what that does. I have seen the most abominable crap settled out in industrial gearboxes, trunnion lube systems and the like, without any sign that any of it has touched anything in the machine. Just chilling in the bottom, waiting for the inevitable operator error that causes the whole machine to need to be dismantled for repairs.
×
×
  • Create New...