Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was calling a mechanic about doing a pre inspection for a car and he mentioned that mechanics don't do them anymore and it's not just as simple as pulling out spark plugs on modern cars but instead they do oscilloscope tests instead? I've never heard of this and I haven't found much information on it. Is this true?

Edited by silviaz

Correct, on modern cars you can just use scanners such as Launch X421 or an Autel.

 

For our older shit boxes, compression tests are an ok way to determine even compression between cylinders, however motor with massive duration cams will read lower compression than say a motor with stock cams. Better to do a leak down test if you want to check engine health.

33 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Correct, on modern cars you can just use scanners such as Launch X421 or an Autel.

 

For our older shit boxes, compression tests are an ok way to determine even compression between cylinders, however motor with massive duration cams will read lower compression than say a motor with stock cams. Better to do a leak down test if you want to check engine health.

Ah ok, but isn't even a 1997 car considered a modern car? That's why I was a bit confused. 

1 minute ago, silviaz said:

Ah ok, but isn't even a 1997 car considered a modern car? That's why I was a bit confused. 

No. Ancient shitbox. The sort of diagnostics that your mechanic is talking about were probably only available on top end Mercs and other leading edge stuff.

A 1997 Nissan is barely more sophisticated than a 1987 Nissan.

  • Like 2

Even a Consult 1 Nissan has a relative compression test function, it's just super jank and you have to do all your own math. You can cut the fuel injection to each cylinder, average the resulting idle RPM in the logs. If one cylinder has relatively low drop when shut down you know something is wrong with it. If there's no misfire or funny business like that then the only conclusion I can think of is low compression.

Launch X431 is great stuff btw, probably the only scan tool I've seen other than maybe the real deal Consult that will let you reset throttle position idle switch on the RB26 instead of guessing blindly at how to do it like I did in the past. It is incredibly slow though compared to NDS1 which is disappointing and the logging functions are nowhere near as powerful I think.

  • Like 1
56 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

reset throttle position idle switch on the RB26 instead of guessing blindly at how to do it like I did in the past

It's never been difficult on that vintage of Nissan stuff. RB20 is same same. I just used to adjust it so that even the very slightest movement off idle would cause the injectors to do the old double pulse thing (which is the accel enrich thing that they do). You literally just listen for them to go click-click-click-clickclick.

47 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It's never been difficult on that vintage of Nissan stuff. RB20 is same same. I just used to adjust it so that even the very slightest movement off idle would cause the injectors to do the old double pulse thing (which is the accel enrich thing that they do). You literally just listen for them to go click-click-click-clickclick.

The RB26 ECU in particular had some weird behavior, if the TPS switch was set to 0.2V when the ECU first gets power after discharging capacitors then it would decide the idle switch was off at 0.5V even though that was the factory spec. Seemingly the actual idle switch in the TPS is vestigial? Or it somehow can be reset, I never really got to the bottom of what was going on there. Regardless it was interesting to see how the scan tool also had a function to relearn the TPS idle position.

8 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Seemingly the actual idle switch in the TPS is vestigial?

It was my understanding that the RB26 was the same same as the RB20. The idle position was 100% determined by the switch on the RB20. The TPS potentiometer was not used for idle at all. And in fact, the potentiometer on the RB20 was only used for the auto transmission!!! The ECU paid it no heed.

Of course, I might be wrong about that on the 26. But seeing as the 26 ECU was just a slightly glorified version of the 20 ECU, I have been willing to believe they used the same strategy. And further of course, maybe because the 26 was ITB fed they found they needed to actually use the potentiometer for the ECU. I could look it up in the manual, but really cannot be arsed. I might have even been schooled on this point before.

It was only on the R33/RB25 era that Nissan abandoned a physical switch in favour of using the potentiometer's value as the determinant for idle position (Which was a pretty shit idea considering how much trouble it's caused people over the years. It was almost certainly done because it was cheaper than having a switch too.) It is this that has led to so much confusion between RB20 and RB25 owners.

  • Like 1
4 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It was my understanding that the RB26 was the same same as the RB20. The idle position was 100% determined by the switch on the RB20. The TPS potentiometer was not used for idle at all. And in fact, the potentiometer on the RB20 was only used for the auto transmission!!! The ECU paid it no heed.

Of course, I might be wrong about that on the 26. But seeing as the 26 ECU was just a slightly glorified version of the 20 ECU, I have been willing to believe they used the same strategy. And further of course, maybe because the 26 was ITB fed they found they needed to actually use the potentiometer for the ECU. I could look it up in the manual, but really cannot be arsed. I might have even been schooled on this point before.

It was only on the R33/RB25 era that Nissan abandoned a physical switch in favour of using the potentiometer's value as the determinant for idle position (Which was a pretty shit idea considering how much trouble it's caused people over the years. It was almost certainly done because it was cheaper than having a switch too.) It is this that has led to so much confusion between RB20 and RB25 owners.

I honestly don't understand what's going on in the RB26. It 100% has a physical TPS idle switch. Seemingly in the R33 at least it does not pay attention to it. I didn't experiment too much but it seemed like it was purely based on a learned voltage. Maybe I'll revisit it but as far as I could tell getting the idle TPS voltage to be about 0.45V was more important than whatever the idle switch trigger point ended up being.

2 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

hopefully the bin shits out $60k in cash or directly deposits that money into my bank account - if so, done deal.

What's the $60k for? replacing broken computers to stop error lights on the dash?

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
    • Thanks for the quick reply. To be clear, when you say turbo shuffle do you mean turbo flutter "stustustu" or referring to something else? I had thought they were the same thing. When I wrote the post my intention was to say it wasn't a flutter/compression surge sound. My understanding was that a flutter sound would be occurring when throttle is released, whereas I can keep the throttle in the same position for this noise
    • Hi everyone, I've been wrestling with this for a while now and have been trying to find out the cause. For context, the turbos used are Garrett 2860 -5s, the BOV is a BNR32 HKS SSQV IV kit, the car is currently tuned to ~470 whp on 17.5 psi. The car drives normally, pulls well when it doesn't happen, and I can replicate it fairly easily. It does not sound like turbo shuffle or flutter. The engine has only a thousand or so miles and has had this behavior since it was completed. After my engine was built for my R32 GTR, I noticed that the car now sometimes makes an air discharge sound on what appears to be positive boost pressure that sounds really similar to a BOV. I had thought that it was a BOV issue but even when replacing it with a brand new unit, the sound persisted. It seems like it's coming from the passenger side but I may be mistaken. The closest scenario I could find was this post here https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/ started by @yakshii and it sounds very similar. As in, at partial throttle once I reach positive boost I begin to hear the same psh psh psh psh psh sound like air is leaking somewhere when I keep the throttle in the same position. It most commonly happens in 4th gear at around 3-3.5k RPM and 5th gear around 2.5-3k RPM, which seems to coincide with normal positive boost thresholds. It might be similar to what @Austrian GTR mentioned about his own HKS SSQV. Notable difference would be that when he applies more throttle when it happens, it stops. In my scenario if I apply more throttle during this repeated psh psh psh sound, the cadence of the sound gets faster and louder rather than stopping. If I lift off slightly and apply throttle again, it will normally stop and pull without issue. I've checked all rubber couplers to ensure that they are tight, but have not gotten the opportunity to properly do a pressurized boost leak test. If anyone has had similar experiences or thoughts on what might be the cause, I'd be very keen to hear them. I also have a video of it happening from inside the cabin, if that would make it easier to understand: https://youtu.be/2zqZXcx8jbA
×
×
  • Create New...