Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

My car has been in storage for more than a year so today i drove it again after all this time, so was happy as can be 🙂

I have a big problem now: I asked at the UK forum(back in 2021) which was the best oil to use for the autobox of 1999 (120000km), and they replied I should get me some Castrol Transmax ATF Z. We changed the oil in 2021, but then the problem started: after the flush/ oil change the autobox went into limp mode and it wouldn't go into 4th gear: because we didn't have time left I drove home and came back 2 weeks later, having driven only 150 km.We checked the oil but it smelt really burnt and the oil was pitch black after only 2 weeks.

After a long flush of the box (again new oil, this time no Castrol and €300.-) the box worked fine..... but after 2000 kilometers the automatic is playing up again: I can use the kick down but the car sometimes won't go to a higher gear or just revs up high like a CVT: so then at 100 km/hour the revs go to 4000rpm (sounds like second gear) and it doesn't accelerate anymore until i take my foot of the gas.The solution for now is to slow down, put it in "manual" and go to second gear and change gears in that way. Then at 100 km/hour it's driving ok and the kick-down works ......but it is not every time that this occurs, but it's frustrating.

We took down the oil pan and found a lot of "metal particles" at the magnet on the bottom of the pan.

Anyone got any idea or had the same problem?

All the info and idea on where to look is more then welcome

Thanx in advance! Cheers, Eddie


 

image.gif

image.gif

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484579-r34gt-x-autobox-problems/
Share on other sites

the uk forum told you the wrong oil to use and you’ve stuffed the clutches and bands in the transmission. You’ll need to remove the the transmission and have it rebuilt and when you put it back in use the correct oil 

Thanx for that quick respons, highly appreciated.

But serious? To bad then: i read their article on what to do to make the gear changes quicker for the autobox and they where all like "this mod is no problem and it works". Should have ordered an MV automatics brain to get it done.

Which transmission oil would you recommend and do you know if there's another way to make the autobox change quicker?

Edited by EddieR34GT-X

I'm not sure on the oil. I thought transmax Z (the auto variant) was entirely fine to use. I used it for many years. I remember its expensive price tag!

However:

What you are experiencing sounds a lot like me to what happened when my first NA box died. As above, it had disentegrated to the point where there was shit clogging the auto trans internal filter. After a little bit of time, it literally sinks back down to the bottom of the sump, and the auto can do it's job.

It is time to consider manual options for your GT-X. I cannot imagine finding another NA AWD R34 box in Europe is a simple thing to do.

Of course, take the box out and seeing what is going on will likely be what happens next. Maybe it's fine. I suspect it won't be. I obliterated my box which had a MV kit in it. The NA auto box is fundamentally shit.

  • Like 1

Hi Kinkstaah,

Thanx for all the info you provided, highly appreciated 👌 The "going to manual" is not an option I had in mind as I have to drive an autobox because of a motorcycle incident some 28 years ago (damn, i'm getting old 😅). I found a company in the UK and they had a spare autobox with only 68000km on it and 3 months warrenty..... and at a good price, so I'm going to install it and drive a lot the comming 3 months.... which is great because the summer is comming 😎

I'll keep my fingers crossed it "survives" and "mind a little less" that the box is a "slow mover" on part of gearchange: by the way.... is there a reason why they state specifically the box is for a Neo NA or Neo GTT?  Can you install a GTT box on an NA or is it not a straight fit??

  • Like 1

Thats the thing, and I hope you're pre-cognizantly done this right because...


The NA and GTT boxes have different electronics, the NA has an external transmission control unit, and the GTT has it built into the engine ECU.

But you have a GT-X, which has various GTT bits in a NA platform. (or at least a NA engine). Does it get the GTT gearbox? Does the GT-X only have GTT brakes? I'm not sure if this knowledge still exists, so you may find that the GTT box works perfectly, or is utterly unusable depending on these variables.

If you're morbidly curious you could check the build plate on the firewall. The GTT box is a RE401B, and the GT box is a RE401A, but that still doesn't actually say whether just swapping them in will work fine or not.

The summary I got from the auto transmission specialists who post-mortemmed my GT box and built a GTT box for me more or less said it was "Entirely different" inside, chalk and cheese/much stronger/not a suprise the GT box died, nothing was going to keep it alive, with no specific documentation. I could regugitate words from a decade ago. Bands? Planetary gears? Locking clutches? Supposedly all better.

It's what you want, but even the GTT box is a sad dissapointment. You could go nuts and install a BMW DCT in there if you want a decent Auto skyline, or burn the thing and buy an Auto Mustang 😛 (or any of the turbo euro cars with a DCT)

Hi Kinkstaah,

Thanks again for the amount of information! 👌

On part of GT-X having GTT parts: i don't know what it has extra over a GT, but it defo ain't got the GTT brakes 😅

I ordered a set of disks at DBA to do an upgrade..... but was "to dumb" to not measure them up before ordering at the local DBA distributor: too bad they won't take them back, so I now have a set of discs that won't fit: trying to sell them to someone in the Netherlands because shipping is like way to expensive.

I will install the autobox next week and have 3 months guaranty, so will be driving a lot to check out if something is "bad": i keep you posted about "my luck" or "un-luck" 🤣

Edited by EddieR34GT-X
  • 3 weeks later...

The old has gone out and the "new" went in: a big difference if you look at the overal state of the old- vs new autobox 😎

Very clean example and works like a charm 👌 It "shifts" a lot quicker and the box stays a lot cooler..... and the kickdown actually works 😅 Been out and about and had a couple of testdrives: the "manual" option reacts just as quick so i'm a happy chappy 😊 Thanx all for the help and info 👊

new.jpg

old.jpg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...