Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Mark at MRC Performance & Dyno in NSW does this quite often, then uses both return/feed OEM lines as dual feed lines to the fuel rail.

The only drawback from this is the length of the vacuum hose from plenum to regulator at the back of the car, also increases the chances of that line failing from debris, unless you go tits out and make it all a hard line.

 

 

@Murray_Calavera I run a 40 micron filter, followed by a 10 micron filter, seems to be the norm? I just copied whatever most of the big shops do LOL.

Another sex spec option, something I may do in future if I still haven't gotten rid of the shit box is to run this:

http://injectordynamics.com/id-f750-fuel-filter/

has a gauge to show you the health of your filter too, no guessing around pulling things out to try clean/resolve.

image.thumb.png.0d6d843b747ca7b36e386278f6860dc9.png

Was doing some extra reading from ID on this filter (looking for info that I didn't find), and they do state, that the gauge is only really useful for normal return setups, and not returnless.

 

Only way the gauge is useful on returnless setup, is while you're at peak power.

14 hours ago, MBS206 said:

and they do state, that the gauge is only really useful for normal return setups, and not returnless.

 

Only way the gauge is useful on returnless setup, is while you're at peak power.

To be fair, if it's mounted under the car, as it would be with most returnless setups, it's not as if it will get looked at very often. But it is a very valid point that you couldn't trust the differential pressure reading at all unless all the fuel was being pushed through it.

But even so - the actual dP through the filter will depend on the size of the fuel pump. If you have a small pump, a clean filter will read a (much**) lower dP than the same clean filter would with a much bigger pump. So the gauge should never be used as an absolute measure anyway. You would need to note the reading on a fresh clean filter and clean/replace when the dP goes up from that reading noticeably. I'm guessing that their instructions would say as much because the spec on the filter clearly shows different pressure drops across it at different flow rates, so they're right across the issue.

**This because dP will increase with the square of flow.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
×
×
  • Create New...