Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I am building a Nitto Stroked RB28 with all the goodies, fully Ported/Polished Head, Kelford 182-SE Cams, VR38 Coil conversion, PRP 32T Trigger kit (or similar) etc. Looking at using either the 6Boost T4 Divided Manifold or Hypertune T4 divided. Which Turbo will give me the quickest spool from around 3500rpm to 8500rpm without running out of puff? Looking for around 750 - 900hp.

Thank you for your input.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484757-best-turbo-for-early-spool-rb28/
Share on other sites

Hi, Forgot to mention that the car will run mostly on RON98 But will be E85 capable. I have been told either Precision 6870 A/R 1.00 with Artec 70mm Big Daddy "V" Band Manifold or Garrett G35-1050 A/R 1.05 using T4 Twin Scroll. Both of these sound great But as this will only be a street car, Which Turbo set up will give the best Response or should I stick with Twin EFR'S?

If wanting quickest spool/response then its twin scroll efr set up. For >750hp, efr8474 or larger. If not efrs, g35-900 or g40-1150, if wanting cheaper, gtw3884r-67mm or gbc37-900, all shoud be in twin scroll set up for better spool/response. Skip g35-1050 at it has mismatched wheels, compressor too large for turbine.

I run a gen2 6466 1.00ar divided T4 on my 2.8 and it spools wickedly fast. If you're aiming for 750-800whp, I think it's a great choice. If you're looking at 900whp+ I'd go 6870. 

 

If wanting quickest spool/response then its twin scroll efr set up. For >750hp, efr8474 or larger. If not efrs, g35-900 or g40-1150, if wanting cheaper, gtw3884r-67mm or gbc37-900, all shoud be in twin scroll set up for better spool/response. Skip g35-1050 at it has mismatched wheels, compressor too large for turbine.



Road car, Borg Warner is the only answer. Anyone who thinks anything responds great has not felt the transient differences that That Ti-Al wheel provides. The turbo is the single most important part of anything. The right turbo will have much more effect than going from 2.6 to 2.8L.

 

  • Like 1

hey mate 

 

check my build thread i have pushed the 6466 as far as i can go on a HKS 2.8 with Rams head and 276 cams

got 820whp and all in just after 4k 

good for a 9.6@146 

copped years of proper motorsport use 

I am going to swap over to a g35900 now just for shits and giggles to be honest and see how it all compares 

but i do recommend a 6466 on a 2.8 as a really good allrounder turbo 

  • Like 2
24 minutes ago, Dr Evil said:

Hi Hattori, The G35-900 was also one of the favorites, please let me know how you get on :) I need to order something in the next few weeks. Also, What Manifold? Hypertune T4 or 6Boost T4 or Artec V band?

Wouldn't the manifold you buy be dictated by the turbo and rear housing you choose? 

You're chasing 'early spool' so it would make sense to choose a T4 TS manifold for a T4 TS turbine housing.

2 hours ago, Dr Evil said:

Hi Hattori, The G35-900 was also one of the favorites, please let me know how you get on :) I need to order something in the next few weeks. Also, What Manifold? Hypertune T4 or 6Boost T4 or Artec V band?

I went 6boost t4 twin scroll

 

1.15 rear housing I gained alot and lost minimal response 

 

2013 my options were 6boost or a bespoke manifold so that's why I went 6boost. 

Ild try Artech if I went again

 

  • 2 weeks later...

I am currently building a Nitto 2.8, GSC S1 Billet cams, Headgames pocket port/shimless bucket head in an R33 GTR. Shooting to make a reasonably responsive 850whp for a street car when in "kill mode". I wanted to go the EFR 8474 Black series, but they are no longer making certain EFR's until further notice. I ended up getting an awesome deal on a Divided T4, 1.0 AR turbine Precision 6870 with the T51r mod for $2100 brand new. This turbo is very similar in size to the EFR 8474, but obviously uses different materials. I think spool should be around the same (all in around 4,500rpm) and I will be revving to about 8,500. Also using a PPG sequential, so once its spooled, it should stay there, which is why I may consider going larger turbo later. This will all be sitting on a Full-Race divided T4 twin 44mm wastegate manifold. My theory is that I will try the "smaller" Precision 6870 before jumping up to a 9180 or even 9280 EFR that are actually available. My engine is almost finished being built, so the car should be running in the next 4-6 months from now, although it wont likely be tuned on E85/full boost for a few months after initial startup. I will stay tuned and update once I have results. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you really don't want to touch anything you can try to trigger off the timing loop just to see if it's sparking semi-regularly. Don't trust it for actual timing measurements.
    • Also replace the fuel filter aswell today
    • Hey everyone, I have a r34 GTT s1, im having a problem with my skyline, ive let the car sit in the garage for the last couple of months and havent run it and ive gone to fire her up today and it cranks but doesnt fire, i have been having problems with it previously where it wouldnt start again after driving it around for a bit. It use to start fine on cold start ups but if you drove to the petrol station and fueled it up and went to go start it again, it would just crank and not fire untill you let it rest for a few hours, the car doesn't over heat it sits perfectly in the middle while driving when warmed up. Im thinking this problem has caught up maybe and now it just wont start at all. The car runs on e85, ive checked the e85 seems to be fine. I can hear the fuel priming before you go to start it and checked all my fuses and relays. List of things I replaced today - New battery - New sparkplugs - New Coolant temp sensor I was thinking about testing the CAS but from what ive seen online, if the CAS is cooked, the car will actually start up but then die instantly? as mine just doesn't fire at all. Does anyone have any idea or have encountered the same problems? thanks
    • Modern reg stuff now, they'd have a wide input range which would push through a buck converter, it would need to be able to maintain voltage for cranking conditions (sub 9V at times). Likely runs something like an internal 6V rail, and then further voltage regulators depending on which circuit/area it is feeding. Modern voltage regs, like what I'm starting a new power supply design with at work, will let me run a 5V rail output, and as long as my input is equal to or greater than 5V, I have a 5V output. Except I'm not pushing a 5V rail in our system as I don't need one, we're setting up for a 3.8V rail. Our new design will allow me 6 to 60VDC input, and everything else doesn't care, even when I start pushing a few Amp outputs.   Realistically, the voltage drop off could be caused by a few things though, one could be literally the alternator is dieing, and hence charge power is dropping, which also means on a straight hard pull you're starting to send the battery flat... (Not that likely from a single couple of gear pull if the battery was fully charged). However, having earth issues, like stray earths not connected, or someone having put a ground loop in, will see the ECU appear to end up with lower voltage "input", mainly because the "ground" is no longer equivalent to battery negative. If they're comparing the input voltage using sensory ground for example, and sensor ground is what is in that ground loop, than the sensor output voltage will actually start to be reduced, when compared to battery ground... Yeah, ground wiring design can start to be a bitch... Also voltage going weird from inductive loads not being managed properly is another real bitch... Hence, why I asked above about how everything was wired in. If OP knows, and can post all of the actual connections from the ECU pin out, as well as what wires are joined where in the loom, which grounds from the ECU have ground points and where they are etc. Would help to see if there is a ground issue. The part I'd start with though, is putting a mechanical oil pressure gauge on to confirm the theory. Otherwise the next track day when the threshold is lowered could result in another of @Duncan favourite types of jokes... Knock knocks... Pretty sure this is what @GTSBoy is also self high fiving...  Is all great that we have a decent theory... But they need to prove it before relying on it...  
    • When I worked at BlueScope Steel, we had an Ethernet network, with every switch setup with a duplicate switch. Even when looking at all the primary switches, they had duplicate links, there was then also duplicated links between the primary in section A, to the duplicate in section B. So for each location that had networking, there was 8 network links. This was all back around 2007. That setup caused sooooo many issues, as many of those links were fibre. The network guys ran everything with Spanning Tree Protocol. And then we had great joy... The FOC Transceivers were slowly dieing, but in an intermittent way. And a lot of the time as they started to die, they'd drop offline for about 30 seconds... Spanning Tree Protocol was requiring 45 seconds to "rewire" the network... And by the time it was mostly finished, it had to start again as the transceiver was back online... Queue entire production network being constantly spammed with the spanning tree protocol messages...   My god I do NOT miss working in huge environments like that!
×
×
  • Create New...