Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i know it’s probably a stupid question but i recently got a new turbo and just wanted to know how bad for my car it would be if i drive it with everything else stock in the car aside from a front mount intercooler i have a 1998 r34 gtt and i am putting a Kinugawa Turbo 3" Anti Surge TD06SL2-20G for Nissan Skyline 

just wondering and hoping someone would know how much more i’m gonna need to upgrade 

Edited by justin parker
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484785-turbo-swap/
Share on other sites

Hi mate, if it starts and drives I'd be surprised, and if you bring it onto boost you will probably kill the motor.

A larger turbo pushes more air (even at wastegate boost), but the factory ECU will only have limited ability to deal with that (say, within a couple of %). Once it goes outside what it expects, it adds heaps of fuel and removes heaps of timing to keep the engine safe from what it expects is a malfunction.

You'll need a tune and/or aftermarket ECU, larger injectors, either larger air flow meter or swap to MAP sensor, probably a boost control solenoid, all the usual. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484785-turbo-swap/#findComment-7981029
Share on other sites

This is going to sound simplistic, but it is, and here I go

Everything on the car exists to support the turbo

So if you change that, the list of things you should _consider_ upgrading is approximately the entire vehicle.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484785-turbo-swap/#findComment-7981035
Share on other sites

Agree with the above.

To put it plainly - the stock turbo is good for ~200rwkW at just enough boost pressure to make it explode (<14 psi). Everything on the car that works with that - the fuel pump, the injectors, the AFM - all of these are only good to about that power level. Some a bit less, especially if old and tired. Some a bit more. But all about the same. The stock clutch will not tolerate even that much for long. The stock auto gearbag will raise the white flag at that power level too.

The TD06 you're putting on is good for upwards of 260 rwkW, at substantially more boost. But even at the same boost as the stocker, it will make a lot more power. As Duncan said, if you put your foot down and ramp up the boost, you will push past the capacity of the fuel system to keep up with the air flow, lean it out and pop it.

Unlike what Duncan said, I would expect it to start and drive. It is an AFM ECU, so it will measure the idle and cruising air flow and provide fuel for that just fine. And that's the danger. Because it should feel fine and it will want to go and when you do.....pop.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484785-turbo-swap/#findComment-7981038
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

What ECU are you going to use? 

Are you going to install all of the supporting mods yourself and then pay a workshop to tune it?

yeah i’ve talked to a shop and they told me the supporting mods i need then im leaving the ecu stuff to them. i have a automatic r34 so they said my stock ecu will control the transmission and the will wire in a haltech 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484785-turbo-swap/#findComment-7981068
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...