Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Curious to know if anyone else has run into this issue before. I helped a friend tune an EFI conversion a little recently and an issue we ran into is that after getting coolant temp into the 90C range, after shutting the engine down and letting the whole engine bake for 5 minutes it wouldn't crank over anymore. Adjusting the cranking fuel pulse width did nothing. Surprisingly what solved it is setting a long fuel pump prime. He's running an MS2 or something like that so it wouldn't allow him to prime for longer than 3 seconds but keying on and off three times to get about 9 seconds of priming has reliably allowed it to restart now in this hot soak scenario. Anyone know a good explanation for exactly what's happening here? My working theory is that the fuel in the rail has boiled from heat soak and the pump needs to cool off the rail to have functional fuel injection again but I'm curious to know what others think.

26 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

My working theory is that the fuel in the rail has boiled from heat soak and the pump needs to cool off the rail to have functional fuel injection again but I'm curious to know what others think.

This is my understanding as well, I generally overcome this in the Haltech by setting a very high injector prime pulse, i.e. the very first injector pulse when the ECU powers up. 

It only seems to be an issue (with my experience) with larger injectors on E85. I've only ever experienced this issue with my own car which has 1480cc (often called 1650cc) injectors. Most of the cars I've tuned in the past generally have the run of the mill 1000cc Bosch injectors.

Being that this is a conversion, there could be so many things going on here.
You could have a bad pump, wiring issues, it could be how the rail has been plumbed, where the Fuel Pressure Regs are located instead, etc etc. 

Without detailed explanation, from vehicle, pumps, wiring, how the whole fuel system is as a whole, the engine of choice, etc etc. Pretty hard to diagnose from online.

As this has been what you've just been tuning, you could be low on fuel, pump may not be able to properly build pressure etc, could be an internal leak inside the fuel tank, and hence when its hot it might be struggling to push fresh fuel through.

4 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Just checking, is there a check valve in the fuel pump or installed in the line?

Supposedly yes, but I have a theory that both are suspect. Haven't been able to get a pressure gauge on it to monitor what it's doing after shutdown as I got busy with other things since then but I suspect it would be interesting.

7 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Being that this is a conversion, there could be so many things going on here.
You could have a bad pump, wiring issues, it could be how the rail has been plumbed, where the Fuel Pressure Regs are located instead, etc etc. 

Without detailed explanation, from vehicle, pumps, wiring, how the whole fuel system is as a whole, the engine of choice, etc etc. Pretty hard to diagnose from online.

As this has been what you've just been tuning, you could be low on fuel, pump may not be able to properly build pressure etc, could be an internal leak inside the fuel tank, and hence when its hot it might be struggling to push fresh fuel through.

This is a series 3 Jaguar E-type convertible. Prior to this it had Stromberg constant depression carbs which were absolutely horrific between that and the bizarre early 70s emissions vacuum retard distributor. I definitely agree that the conversion nature makes it hard to actually disambiguate what's going on but at the time of the hot soak we had come back from a fresh fill so the tank was full. The whole fuel system was just redone for the EFI conversion so I would be kind of surprised if it's leaking inside the tank but anything is possible.

21 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

Does it have engine fault codes?

I had similar with a bad CAS or CPS

Started fine when cold, but wouldn't restart at temp

At the time of the tuning session it still ran the factory distributor, actually the ECU didn't have any engine position so there's no concept of anything like fuel injection timing or ignition sync. Verified the spark plugs were in fact firing too.

Distributors have a resistor thingie that can cause a similar fault

I had a old Ford Bronco with a 351, once hot if you shut it down it wouldn't restart

The heat would separate the connection, it contracted when cold and would work again 

I had similar (though probably red herring issues) here with my LS1 on hot restarts, but it wasn't fuel related as much as it was IAT related. The IAT/density model is too aggressive at pulling fuel out when the air temp increases, so it was hyper lean for the first few seconds and cranking.

You could solve this by adding a ton of fuel (as above) in hot conditions, or by correcting the IAT curve or the calculations or whatever is available in the ECU.

This is how I get around it, probably not the most ideal. Also because the fuel temp sensor is part of the flex sensor, you're not able to get the correct fuel temperature at the rail so the entire fuel density vs. fuel temp becomes irrelevant when the fuel soaks in all the heat from the rail. If I wanted actually properly use the fuel density table, I really should install a fuel temp sensor on the fuel rail itself.

image.thumb.png.eaad993f1bc8d7d47883dc2df7af750f.png

And this is my fuel density table vs. fuel temp vs. ethanol concentration (used BP data and blended it with available E85 data found on the net).

image.thumb.png.2ccfc9d16704f69ef573f720cc6aaff1.png

 

4 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

This is how I get around it, probably not the most ideal. Also because the fuel temp sensor is part of the flex sensor, you're not able to get the correct fuel temperature at the rail so the entire fuel density vs. fuel temp becomes irrelevant when the fuel soaks in all the heat from the rail. If I wanted actually properly use the fuel density table, I really should install a fuel temp sensor on the fuel rail itself.

image.thumb.png.eaad993f1bc8d7d47883dc2df7af750f.png

And this is my fuel density table vs. fuel temp vs. ethanol concentration (used BP data and blended it with available E85 data found on the net).

image.thumb.png.2ccfc9d16704f69ef573f720cc6aaff1.png

 

On a setup where the fuel reg is at the other end of the rail, and hence returning to tank from the engine bay, Apart from at restart, fuel temp at the rail, should be so close to fuel temp at your flex sensor, it would be negligible.

Reason being, the amount of fuel flowing past at speed through the main item (fuel rail) that will heat it up, and pulling heat away.

By the time you've primed the fuel pump for 3 seconds, and then gone straight to crank, for say another 2 seconds, that fuel is matching pretty much the temp of your flex sensor. The rail may be hotter, but the fuel is barely increasing due to the speed it's going past at.

The part where you get "fuel heat soak" is when you don't have enough fuel in the tank, and just keep pumping it past a hot thing really quickly, and it's picking up small amounts of heat more than it can drop off. Our tanks are plastic these days, not great for heat transfer out...

Think of it like turning the kitchen tap on and waiting for the cold water to come through in summer. It gets through and rapidly changes from hot, to cold. This does take a while in some houses, as the water that's truly cold, is a LONG way away from your tap. Even if you held an Oxy Acetylene torch to your tap, the amount of water rolling through won't make the outlet temp change much at all.

 

You also need to be careful where you install a temp sensor, and how much you're relying on that temperature. Temperature sensors have a first order response, which means they can't be super quick. Secondly, most I've seen are a metal sensor, in a metal housing. You screw that into a metal item, you're more likely to be measuring the metal temp you screwed into, than the liquid you want to measure. IE metal could be hotter from other factors, or could be getting more cooling and hence reading lower.

 

Even from your data, from 10c to 90c, that's only a 7% variation when on 100% fuel. At startup, I bet you could easily remove 15% fuel from your cranking table and it would still start up, especially when warm.

 

A returnless system obviously does have more heat soak type issues in it, as fuel isn't leaving the rail, except through the engine...

1 hour ago, MBS206 said:

Apart from at restart, fuel temp at the rail, should be so close to fuel temp at your flex sensor, it would be negligible.

Ahhh you see, my flex sensor is on the feed side of the main tank to surge tank, thus only is sampling the main tank's temperature. Once running and everything is flowing around as it should, then there's probably negligible difference in temperature, however on start up there would be a difference.

59 minutes ago, wardiz said:

How does look like your fuel post start correction ?

Is it really usefull to have the temp in y axis ? 1 litre of fuel weightinh 775g @ 40C is going to weight the same @60C, isn't it ?

I'll post that up when I'm back on my tuning laptop.

Liquid density changes as it gets warmer, suppose the 20°C difference isn't going to make a huge difference however more data would provide for accurate fueling so it doesn't hurt to have (plus I just copy paste the same table into all other tunes I do).

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Liquid density changes as it gets warmer, suppose the 20°C difference isn't going to make a huge difference however more data would provide for accurate fueling so it doesn't hurt to have (plus I just copy paste the same table into all other tunes I do).

The change is probably small enough to have no impact ( the tuner tutorials I follow never mention that). However the temperature mais have a greater impact on the atomisation of the fuel than the change of density.
 

But my main though is that more fuel may be needed at startup than regular gazoline. Thus do you have a kind of compensation table for the fuel post start offset relying on the fuel composition ?

23 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

I had similar (though probably red herring issues) here with my LS1 on hot restarts, but it wasn't fuel related as much as it was IAT related. The IAT/density model is too aggressive at pulling fuel out when the air temp increases, so it was hyper lean for the first few seconds and cranking.

You could solve this by adding a ton of fuel (as above) in hot conditions, or by correcting the IAT curve or the calculations or whatever is available in the ECU.

I think he ran into similar issues, once it actually kicks over he experiences lean running for a little bit before it corrects. I suggested just papering over that problem with after start enrichment at high coolant temps but the whole thing is getting redone with a crank sensor because he's sick of fighting the distributor which was constantly misfiring at idle but weirdly not at cruise or full throttle. I'd see something like a full point of AFR lean-out in response to a misfire so I disabled all closed loop corrections even after I was done messing with VE tables. He's also using one of those old style AEM controllers that blasts the heater the second it gets power from the ignition switch so the sensors aren't going to last very long regardless and there's no real failure detection in those controllers either to my knowledge.

Once he gets the new setup running I'm sure I'll have new and exciting issues to learn about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I like mine. Much better than stock. Like i said before the reverse/parking cameras look even worse than normal, still useable. When you buy one make sure it's the latest version. Heaps of cheap ones that run the old hardware and software. Got mine from AliExpress. Mine is quick no lag, boots up 1-2 sec. Menu is fast. Netflix is fine and so is YouTube. Android Auto is random taking 3sec to 15sec. Most of the time it's quick. Very rare it doesn't connect. But that could be a phone thing.   Now I think they use a Pixel 3XL to run this whole thing which i guess is fine, but the problem is that some apps will not work on old hardware like Disney Plus  Maybe Prime Video too 🤔. they will not update. Iv'e tried getting the APK Disney + but i still couldn't get it working. I have a Data sim installed so i have internet all the time. You can't Hotspot off your phone and connect Android Auto at the same time. Not that you need too, if you want you can hotspot off your phone and run any internet map app (google maps) and you can run the Spotify app on it's own (the app runs better than android auto) You can still access the INFINITI intouch system for all the o.g stuff    P.S i got new non Polarization Sunglasses too 😎 
    • I also don't mean to rain on your parade. But with a 5-10k budget for road only? I'd want to check confirmation that everything IS working correctly and I'm with @GTSBoy for a plan of action here. I'd be checking subframes, bushes, exhaust hangers, interior bits and generally QOL things and CONFIRMING they are working right before thinking about motor. You can get 250KW+ on stock RB26 hardware by simply removing the built in restrictors and tuning the stock ECU. If you want purity that's as far to take it, which I would be worried to do and won't think the budget would allow for when earnestly checking for 30+ year old car stuff.
    • I specifically said buy new performance car because of the use case here (i.e, no track use and fun livable everything/do it all easily if not especially amazing as a drivers car). Tracking an 80K Skyline and an 80K M2 makes the BMW the obviously more risky purchase WHEN something goes wrong you suddenly can't easily fix it with hand tools and readily available parts that you may have a community of people you know available, or years of your own knowledge on the platform to apply. There's reasons you see Hondas and Vettes and RB's and Miatas and such at tracks, you can easily hand-tool repair 99.9% of it in a shed, usually with the tools and the skillset of the owner to apply to it. An i30N is not going to beat a R chassis unless it's got massive problems either. The old cars can, and still do work great. The problem is - and always has been - social media would have you believe it's simple and easy to achieve the results you see online.  People want their car to be like "one of those cool JDM cars" which is the default image people have when they think of  "cool JDM cars" You are paying 25 years of catchup R&D to achieve. Or the knowledge somebody else has to do it for you, which is big dollar restomod stuff.  The bar has been moved and every R chassis that people see/like/enjoy has 25 years of R&D thrown at it, or is owned by someone who did all that work and has that knowledge over the past 25 years. All the survivors have been progressively resto-modded the entire time. OR you slowly bring it back to how it was stock. Which is also prohibitively expensive, done for the love of it. This is what the JDM community is now. This is fine, but "Where do I start?" is either: 1) Don't 2) Take your own slow journey but you cannot compare your progress with others who have had 25 years of R&D and experience building their own cars unless you pay for it.
    • Yep, with the crazy inflation of the value of our cars these past couple of years this became a problem for me too... My solution is to transition to bikes. Everything feels so cheap compared to tracking the skyline lol
    • So, I've been a little busy on this car. I replaced the bonnet struts which is always satisfying but very confusing that nobody else on the planet seems to do this. Its just my routine first thing I do on any car I buy. The boot struts for both the tailgate and the separately opening glass window was a bastard. And, I found a fair bit of rust in the strut cavity. I filled it with rust converter and cleaned up as much of the dirt as I could. There was so much dirt. One piece of the trim was barely hanging on and so I've left it off. I'll try to get a replacement. You can see how disgusting and dirty it all was in this thread; I had to remove the little clips that hold the struts on the ball. The ones I took off had no clips and it was impossible to get them on with them in place. Fingers crossed they stay put. So, I turned my attention to the headlights, they were in a bad way and likely would stop rego. I took the headlights out and found the adjusters were all just loose. So, I fixed those and unclipped the lenses to clean them up. Couldn't believe how easy it was to take all this apart compared to the E90.   I also cleaned up the stockies which was awesome, these are super cool with lug nut covers. They're in good nic but the tyres are shot. I was going to use these for rego but in the end got a fresh pair of rubber for the 17's on the front of the car instead. The front bar of this car is from a late(r) model one. I don't think it's quite LCI but who knows. I'll need to find out. Anyway, the bar was missing the fog lights and the wiring and plugs were for the original ones so I got new plugs and some cheap fogs. I wasn't sure if missing original equipment would hamper my blue slip attempts. Had a couple of these little fellas helping out. But not Ben who got stuck behind the pool heater .... How embarressment.  I ordered new speed sensors for all corners because I knew one was out. I just got cheapies and will replace them with Bosch items when I can find Bosch items. Again, this was just for rego. Alas, it seems the blue speed sensors are not the same as the grey ones. Back they went and replacements ordered. In the end, with my new scan tool, it was just rear left that was shot. Replaced it and cleared the codes. All good now. Lastly, my aux (thermo) fan is being a bit odd. Its powering up at strange times and NOT powering up when I think it should (100C). While this can be caused by a few things, the most likely (for me) is the ambient temp sensor. Given mine reads -40.0C regardless of the temp, I figured it would be good to replace it. In the end, the sensor wiring was abysmal with (terrible) attempts made by somebody to fix it.   I fixed this all up but the sensor is only attached using pins into the wires. The plug is not there. Despite trying and trying to connect it securely it wouldn't work so a replacement sensor and plug is on the way. Oh, I also ordered a replacement piece of trim for the part missing here at the bottom. Ordered from Latvia for $70 delivered. I took a bit of a leap of faith because I didn't have the exact part number and, as usual, there were eleventy billion pieces of trim that looked to fit. Nailed it. Well, its not totally perfect but I think its more a 28 y/o car problem than a trim problem. And, as of today ..... I have bought the workshop manuals 2nd hand off a guy in tassie. 1000+ pages of E39 goodness, hopefully it helps me with the fan. I also have a new temp switch on the way incase its the problem. Stoked.
×
×
  • Create New...