Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Comm said:

How much less lag would you get if you went with let’s say a 0.83 housing. Exact same setup do you think that would be better?

I have not backed to backed the G35 900 housing but have on the 6466 - went from .84 to 1.15 did not loose any response and gained a touch more up top. I think E85 makes the old smaller rear housing argument redundant. 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

Plenty of ways to chase response.

- Stroker Kits

- E85

- 4.11 Diff Gears

- 3.7 Final Drive

- Vcam

- Carbon Driveshafts 

- Turbo Choice

I've got a 2.8 with Vcam, Carbon driveshaft and -5's. Response is great even on 98 and relatively old turbos. If you can, drive different setups and see what you prefer

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Can I do these at the same time? How do they both work?

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

Do I have to take my tongue out of my cheek now? My point was very much more that both of these cannot be the same recommendation to achieve more response. Only one of them qualifies, and only for an R34.

Beyond that point, suffice to say the ATTESA won't thank anybody for trying both at once!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope, but they are definitely one of the default choices. Well established.
    • Has anyone used > https://performancecoating.com.au/  
    • Haha actually I did join back then under a different email address,  I couldn't re-activate my account so made a new one! I didn't post much anyway so not missing out on much. Amazing to see how the value of the cars and parts has changed over the years, also ACT section appears to be dead now. 
    • Thanks... It's in pretty good condition overall, probably due to not being drifted/tuned however being a daily driver has taken its toll. Had 100k on the clock when I got it, up to 180k now. Unfortunately it's not 100% dent free, it's got a small dent on FLH side and broken indicator from where I hit a small kangaroo at high speed. If you look at closely at pic #5 you might spot the dodgy trailer light repair my old man and I rigged up as temporary repair! - It's still there due to a combo of needing the car as daily driver and then too lazy/busy to fix properly. I've a couple of other minor accidents accidents as well but nothing major. One required a new front bar and unfortunately the smash repairer ordered the normal gtst one and not the aero bar. Needed the car back asap so just went with it, regretted ever since.
    • I can't believe that anyone is foolish enough to believe that the base maps are for any other purpose than to drive the car up onto the trailer/truck or gently creep it to the dyno. No matter how good they are, they can never be any better than the factory maps**, and only the foolish trust those on a significantly modified setup. **Yeah, yeah. I know there's also the difference between factory maps being fixed to certain injector sizes and MAP/AFM/VE relationships, and the likely aftermarket ECU base maps being better able to handle the sorts of changes that would render a stock ECU dangerous, like different sized injectors. But let's just ignore that for the moment, because the principle is still the same.  
×
×
  • Create New...