Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Comm said:

How much less lag would you get if you went with let’s say a 0.83 housing. Exact same setup do you think that would be better?

I have not backed to backed the G35 900 housing but have on the 6466 - went from .84 to 1.15 did not loose any response and gained a touch more up top. I think E85 makes the old smaller rear housing argument redundant. 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

Plenty of ways to chase response.

- Stroker Kits

- E85

- 4.11 Diff Gears

- 3.7 Final Drive

- Vcam

- Carbon Driveshafts 

- Turbo Choice

I've got a 2.8 with Vcam, Carbon driveshaft and -5's. Response is great even on 98 and relatively old turbos. If you can, drive different setups and see what you prefer

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Can I do these at the same time? How do they both work?

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

Do I have to take my tongue out of my cheek now? My point was very much more that both of these cannot be the same recommendation to achieve more response. Only one of them qualifies, and only for an R34.

Beyond that point, suffice to say the ATTESA won't thank anybody for trying both at once!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...