Jump to content
SAU Community

Mobil 1 v Motul engine oils.


P1E
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok here's something that I have only discovered recently. This is to do with my motorcycle, but since oil is meant to remain as consistent as possible between changes I think it can apply to a certain extent to cars. The main difference between my bike and car is the operating temps, as the bike has no turbo.

In the past I have been changing the oil in my bike every 3000km (factory specifies 6000km). However at between 1000-2500km, I noticed the (wet) clutch grabbing significantly more than when the oil was fresh. To me that means the oil friction properties have changed, because the oil is now allowing the clutch to slip differently than when the oil is fresh. Even though this means the clutch is slipping more, I fail to see how the oil could be getting BETTER over time. Oils break down in engines, they don't get better.

This happened across the board no matter what oil I was using, and I noticed that the "cheaper" oils would do it earlier than the more expensive ones. The oils I used in the bike in order of worst to best are:

Castrol Formula R 5W-30

Castrol Formula R 10W-60

Shell synthetic 10W-40 (designed for motorcycles)

Motul semi-synth 15W-50 (designed for motorcycles)

Mobil 1 5W-50

Fuchs synthetic 5W-50

Motul semi-synth Turbolite 10W-40

The weirdest thing here is that the oils designed for motorcycles are only average at best. The reason I tried car oils is because I read a review on the net saying that motorcycle oils aren't necessarily better for bikes. The most surprising thing is the Turbolite oil I've got listed at the end there, which I used for the first time in my most recent oil change. I accidentally missed my usual 3000km oil change because I was waiting for the clutch to slip to know when I should start paying attention to the odometer (I have to push a button to cycle it between the trip meter). But it's still working exactly the same as when the oil was new, after 3500km. Because of that I'm going to see if it can do the full 6000km without having to change the oil.

I don't get it. A cheap semi-synth is better than a full synth costing 50% more? I also don't understand why Motul have a car oil that's better in a bike than their bike oil. Just marketing at work I guess. I still use the more expensive 5W-50 8100 full synth Motul in the Skyline, but mostly because the turbo runs a lot hotter and I think a semi-synth will break down too quickly because of that.

Anyway I'm sold on Motul. I don't see any need to buy other brands again, unless Motul changes their formula for the worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen it mentioned but can i bring Castrol Magnatec into the equation? The promoted stuff about it reducing all that engine wear at start up etc. its viscus rating aswell is 10W so pretty low.

I see many of you are mentioned how the oils suck up all the dirt and carbon which causes it to go black so basically reducing the engine wear which magnatec says it does.

anyone got any results?

i have used Mobil 1 before and didn't really notice the difference between taht and castrol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am impressed with all this level of adjustment. I didn't expect all this possibility
    • Correct.  In the case of the 500kw dyno plot I showed you the car actually runs two boost control solenoids for boost control and a 5psi wastegate spring.  It allows me to control how much boost pressure is applied to both sides of the wastegate valve at any point and fairly accurately control boost target as a result. I've tuned it so that it's able to target anywhere from 5psi to 25psi depending on what's needed.  The target tables I've set up in that car are Gear vs RPM, so every gear has potential for a different boost (and torque) curve.   First and second gear have quite low boost targets, third gear actually has different target boost all the way through the rpm range as it's a stock RB25 gearbox - the boost targets have been chosen to maintain a peak of 600nm (what the owner has set as the maximum torque he's happy with putting through the stock 3rd gear) but it carries that to the rev limiter.   The boost curve to achieve that is something of a ramp up, then hold, then ramp up again and the power curve looks more like a flat line haha.  
    • so you can decrease or increase the boost depending on the diet as you wish?     by acting on the wastegate?
    • That's torque and power, it's all from a single run.  The boost curve is "held back" from it's peak target in the 3500rpm to 5000rpm range from memory, so it ramps hard to something like 18psi then climbs more progressively to 23psi nearer 5000rpm.   It makes the torque (and power) ramp more "natural" and less hard on parts and traction, it doesn't feel artificially held back.   
    • Here's the torque curves from the car I ramped boost up later in the rpm to allow a slightly wider useful power curve - the power curve is a bit weird shaped also thanks to the TVIS (or whatever they call it with the 4EFTE in this Starlet) which changes the volume of the intake manifold throughout the rpm range, but you can see that the green power curve actually holds later on with the extra boost... but looks almost more like the kind of thing you'd expect from a cam or exhaust change
×
×
  • Create New...