Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 08/02/2024 at 12:56 AM, Kinkstaah said:

If one of the results from b) looks really strange, or the VCT switch over point is strange (like 6000+ rpm? or at 1000 rpm?) then that would be where you start looking as to how your cams have been physically set up.

Expand  

I saw this curve in person on the dyno screen. My VTC on graph was making substantially more power the WHOLE way and touched at 6500. This is now relying on my eternally questionable memory but I saw that, and hence was really keen on my degree wheel plan.

 

  On 08/02/2024 at 12:56 AM, Kinkstaah said:

a) More timing. Like 5 degrees+++ everywhere more timing. The old adage was "20 degrees at 20psi". You're nowhere near it. This is NOT a licence to just throw 5 degrees in and send it lol.

Expand  

Tyvm for adding confirmation, and no hahahaha I'm not touching that shit. I still think there's a cam issue, just I'm time poor atm and cannot check imminently (I also need to figure out how the hell I'm going to mount my degree wheel without gutting my radiator and crank pulley if at all possible lol)

Edited by CowsWithGuns
  On 08/02/2024 at 1:01 AM, CowsWithGuns said:

but my VE still seems to fall off HARD, and my VCT disengagement point is very high. Are these things related or separate in your eyes?

Expand  

Sorry finishing lunch, can't spend much time - though for food for thought, the tanking VE I'm not 100% is thaaat bad.   I threw your 220kpa VE line into excel, then calculated "Unitless flow rate"... basically VE x RPM and divided by a made up number to bring the final values into something that looks meaningful.  Where VE is proportional to torque, this value would be proportional to power.    Obviously mechanical losses etc come into it too, so power will roll over more than this shows but this is not close to showing power flat lining at 5000rpm.

image.thumb.png.f04bab89112c19b725df1b3adc16f1d2.png

Now, short answer is timing doesn't affect VE - it's basically just saying how much air is moved by each cylinder in each complete engine cycle.   But timing DOES affect how well the air moved (as a result of VE and boost) is used.   You can increase torque without increasing VE if you aren't at optimal timing.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1

6000rpm is weird. Usually the cutover point is half that. 3500. Could it be soft timing? I do not know.

The way forward is gonna be check how those cams are degreed. Then get a second opinion/second tuner. The second opinion/second tuner could also be somebody who has installed RB cams before. They are stock cams, right?

Of course, time poor and money poor does skew things.

  On 08/02/2024 at 1:30 AM, Kinkstaah said:

6000rpm is weird. Usually the cutover point is half that. 3500. Could it be soft timing? I do not know.

The way forward is gonna be check how those cams are degreed. Then get a second opinion/second tuner. The second opinion/second tuner could also be somebody who has installed RB cams before. They are stock cams, right?

Of course, time poor and money poor does skew things.

Expand  

Yeah, I've been hung up on that.

Ok, latest and greatest action plan is

1. Verify my cam timing, attend to it as required. If I need to take timing belt off for any reason, adjustable gears (and the boost doc VCT adjustment thingo) are going on - only wish I knew their value in the past. And yes, stock cams. I forsee nothing to gain by upgrading to some mild kelfords or poncams, but happy to be told otherwise.

2. Get it on a dyno again with explicit request to optimise ignition advance (not that this is something that should need to be said but anyway...). Things are looking a little grim for the recent tune, but honestly just the constant comms and the tuner chatting to me for a full hour after I arrived really did put them in my good books so I'll *probably* take it back - and he had a folder full of powerful R34 dyno logs I glanced at so I'm erring on 'theres a reason for this' rather than incompetence or otherwise. Regardless, I will contact and ask - and the answer will guide my decision on return, or f**k it and gamble with tuner #4.

I'm time and money poor but thankfully only acutely. I did just spend 3 fulltime weeks and like 10 grand on this build over xmas + tune/diag fees. Will probably not have more to share until I do the above... and I could do with a rest - this whole procedure has taken a toll. Huge thanks to everyone for your support! Maybe there will come a time I will be the one with a happy car and a brain full of experience to share here ;)

Edited by CowsWithGuns

I mean with all the above taken into account, there's definitely some wisdom in just driving the fking thing, and a 250KW RB will not be in any danger with its low timing, low boost, and not making peak power at 7500rpm as you slam into the limiter.

Conservative just means you're burning the candle more slowly after all, that has its own happy merits too.

  • Like 1
  On 08/02/2024 at 1:47 AM, CowsWithGuns said:

I arrived really did put them in my good books so I'll *probably* take it back - and he had a folder full of powerful R34 dyno logs I glanced at so I'm erring on 'theres a reason for this' rather than incompetence or otherwise

Expand  

I haven't scrutinised the hell out of the tune yet, but my initial impressions are that I don't exactly have red flags about what he's done and said to you.  Sure, there are things I can pick in there buuuuuuuuut nothing alarming so far and again, it seems like it was left safe and ok to drive while things get resolved so you don't burn money.  Integrity and transparency are hard to find in a tuner, dude looks like he has both and left the car behaving a heap better than it was when it arrived.   From the POV of someone who likes to think I'm not stupid and do an ok job, I've 100% taken a car off the dyno and later gone "ahh shxt I should have just done x to confirm y".  We're all human, there are a lot of balls in play, and when something isn't going the way you expect it can throw you and you can't take all the time in the world to cover all bases when someone stressed about money has to pay for you to do it.

It could age that made 100% the right call as well, and I'm a cowboy :D  But yeah.   I'm not just being diplomatic, if I raise questions suggesting mayyybe a couple of differences with the tuning approach may have left you a lot happier is not saying he's incompetent and I *could* be wrong as well. 

All I was saying is there a chance that even 3-4deg of timing through a lot of the map on the exact mechanical setup you have MAY have got it to a point that you'd have not raised an eyebrow at the result, and I'm not sure why that wasn't tried but not saying there was no good reason.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 2
  On 08/02/2024 at 1:30 AM, Kinkstaah said:

6000rpm is weird. Usually the cutover point is half that. 3500. Could it be soft timing? I do not know.

Expand  

Nah mine is at 6700, best switch over when I over laid 2x runs with VCT on and off.

And I reckon stock switch-off is about 4700-4800, depending on Neo/vanilla. I get the impression that if an adjustable exhaust gear is used or bigger cams are installed, that there is usually good reason to increase that to ~5500. Results will vary, consult you doctor, etc etc.

  On 08/02/2024 at 5:09 AM, GTSBoy said:

And I reckon stock switch-off is about 4700-4800, depending on Neo/vanilla. I get the impression that if an adjustable exhaust gear is used or bigger cams are installed, that there is usually good reason to increase that to ~5500. Results will vary, consult you doctor, etc etc.

Expand  

Yeah.  In my general experience the more the engine is allowed to breathe the higher you can set it and  hold torque.  Upgraded intake manifold, aftermarket exhaust manifold/turbo that drops EMAP etc seem to let it carry.   I've definitely had results which back up what @Dose Pipe Sutututu has found... late 6000rpm has been perfectly rational on some RB25 setups I've done.

This particular car though, if I were tuning it from scratch I'd have "started" my VCT change over hunt in the mid 5000rpm range based off previous experience.

  On 09/02/2024 at 2:34 AM, jdniss said:

Is there supposed to be a "hole" in the E-Throttle target table from 6000~7000rpm below 100% TP?

Theoretically you wouldn't hit it under 100% WOT, but seems odd

image.thumb.png.d9dfbfa3411a2631ec5b0b4332f99189.png

Expand  

That seems hell weird !  But I've never played with drive by wire.  Love to know a reason ?

  On 09/02/2024 at 2:34 AM, jdniss said:

Is there supposed to be a "hole" in the E-Throttle target table from 6000~7000rpm below 100% TP?

Theoretically you wouldn't hit it under 100% WOT, but seems odd

image.thumb.png.d9dfbfa3411a2631ec5b0b4332f99189.png

Expand  

Nice spotting.  Damn I wish I had more time to look over this tune now, that looks like a fk up.   It's not unusualy for people to not be "not at WOT", or even for the APS to not be at a full 100%.   With this throttle map if the driving was at like 95% (I've seen that plenty of times) then this would command 50% *actual* throttle.   Not necessarily a thing that would have shown itself on the dyno (tuner was 99.8% APS so probably about 98% TPS which should be good enough) but very strange and would definitely affect things in the real world if it's not part of some other strategy.

 

  On 09/02/2024 at 2:38 AM, Butters said:

That seems hell weird !  But I've never played with drive by wire.  Love to know a reason ?

Expand  

Andre from HPA suggested in a webinar targeting a slightly lower than 100% TP target as not to smash the E-Throttle blade into the stop and run the risk of snapping it ~ something like a 98-99% target instead;

Though the max e-throttle clamp in this tune is 99% DC - so maybe that achieves the same thing?
-Same here, I don't have an E-Throttle to compare against, just guessing 😄
 

  On 09/02/2024 at 2:47 AM, Lithium said:

Nice spotting.  Damn I wish I had more time to look over this tune now, that looks like a fk up.   It's not unusualy for people to not be "not at WOT", or even for the APS to not be at a full 100%.   With this throttle map if the driving was at like 95% (I've seen that plenty of times) then this would command 50% *actual* throttle.   Not necessarily a thing that would have shown itself on the dyno (tuner was 99.8% APS so probably about 98% TPS which should be good enough) but very strange and would definitely affect things in the real world if it's not part of some other strategy.

 

Expand  


Yeah it'd be really nice to see a full WOT log past 6000rpm with a heap more parameters enabled,
or the laptop plugged in doing all the logging @CowsWithGuns.

Might rule out whether VTC switch on/off point or E-Throttle target or RPM/MAP limiter is playing a factor in the low power.
 

Edited by jdniss
  On 09/02/2024 at 2:34 AM, jdniss said:

Is there supposed to be a "hole" in the E-Throttle target table from 6000~7000rpm below 100% TP?

Theoretically you wouldn't hit it under 100% WOT, but seems odd

image.thumb.png.d9dfbfa3411a2631ec5b0b4332f99189.png

Expand  

May be part of the problem. I bet someone fat fingered a short cut button.
Fill in the spots by copying across. Re calibrate Ap and DBW.
Your APS calibration is off as well so see how it goes after all that
APScal.thumb.png.03f74a534d4a0674964b04f6505933cc.png

We did find keeping the DBW throttle body not fully open increased torque in parts of the map on my rb25.

  On 09/02/2024 at 3:12 AM, robbo_rb180 said:

We did find keeping the DBW throttle body not fully open increased torque in parts of the map on my rb25.

Expand  

I'd be keen to get more details around that.

Hahahahah, well spotted gang. Here's the story there:

I put in e-throttle and tuned it to driveable state so I could drive to the tuners. That's my work there (noob me didn't fill right but interpolated vertically, and didn't realise theres more to the table).

Tuner never noticed it, never ran into issues. On the drive home I experienced what felt like a boost cut protection at 6000 rpm and found that after slewthing the next day. I decided not to bring it up here as on the dyno TPS was still 99% so it wouldn't be relevant - and I didn't want to highlight my ineptitude on the laptop :)

I ended up emailing the tuner just to verify there wasn't some strategy there but realised that this was definitely my work lmao.

  On 09/02/2024 at 3:08 AM, jdniss said:

Yeah it'd be really nice to see a full WOT log past 6000rpm with a heap more parameters enabled,
or the laptop plugged in doing all the logging @CowsWithGuns.

Expand  

Here is a WOT run in 2nd gear after I fixed the throttle target table. Unfortunately I don't have anywhere nearby where I can full send in 3rd or 4th.

  On 09/02/2024 at 3:12 AM, robbo_rb180 said:

Your APS calibration is off as well so see how it goes after all that

Expand  

What indicates this to you? I haven't done it yet but can do - just curious what gives that away to you?

I also turned on closed loop just for stage 1 clamp. I feel like my spool improved a decent bit afterwards, but that could just be placebo.

e85b76dd-26c7-49b3-85c3-720749660abd.thumb.jpg.9ce2b3b4eccdf80475fa45ae3294a939.jpg

 

  On 09/02/2024 at 3:12 AM, robbo_rb180 said:

We did find keeping the DBW throttle body not fully open increased torque in parts of the map on my rb25.

Expand  

Interesting you say this. I noticed on my previous build (stock throttle) that in first gear the car definitely felt more powerful at something like 80-90% throttle rather than all the way, but only some of the time. I thought I was going crazy.

 

PC Datalog - 2024-02-8 2;32;37 pm.llgxFetching info...

Edited by CowsWithGuns
  On 08/02/2024 at 12:56 AM, Kinkstaah said:

a) More timing. Like 5 degrees+++ everywhere more timing. The old adage was "20 degrees at 20psi". You're nowhere near it. This is NOT a licence to just throw 5 degrees in and send it lol.

Expand  
  On 08/02/2024 at 2:00 AM, Lithium said:

All I was saying is there a chance that even 3-4deg of timing

Expand  

The tuner on whether I am knock limited and the possibility of more timing advance:

"Regarding the ignition tables, the values we have in there are on par with the other 25neos we have tuned and are confident in where they are set. I’m not sure what values you’re comparing as the table axis was originally set to MAP but have now been changed to display that axis as MGP. That can make it a bit confusing to compare to different tunes if they have their tables set up differently. But as far as the it being knock limited, yes that is the case in the low end/mid range as it comes onto boost but that is typical on this sort of setup and yours didnt seem any worse than usual. "

I don't know what to make of all this. Ye wise SAU veterans say the advance is less than normal - my tuner says it's normal. I went on a hunt to find tuned, well performing neo files online to see for myself but only found one (admittedly with ~2 deg more advance on the top end) but that's a sample size of 1 lol. No doubt they are out there so I just need to search harder. Does anyone have a comparable R34 tune file that performs mint for me to look at?

I also received this as my final result.

image.thumb.png.bc2dbe29a449e6c0c8c7c9defcec68ca.png

Made a degree wheel and took some measurements. I could not find details on stock camshaft duration and position at 1mm, so I am using the smallest tomei 'drop in' camshaft as a sensible reference for duration.

image.thumb.png.98e0dcd955a90d57927c6d4cee85f5a4.png

image.thumb.png.7edaf9b4db5efd08fc73b1b027a84045.png

 

image.thumb.png.d61d93204977983a470769a2091ee424.png

My dial gauge was really really touchy and would move around 0.2mm give or take, due to the scuffed clearance to the lifter (sometimes rubbing on the camshaft)to take to access the valve, so give a generous tolerance to my measurements.

I don't understand camshafts enough to have confident conclusions, but my observations and thoughts are:

  • Intake cam seem dead on perfect, HOWEVER, my lift measured is 8.5mm (caliper), ~8.6mm (dial gauge) and the factory spec is 8.4 according to Tomei. Strange but does not worry me too much.
  • Exhaust cam seems totally rooted! Cam lift spec is 8.7mm and I measure 7.2mm with calipers and 7.0 with dial gauge. Accordingly, my duration is 20 degrees lesser than my intake cam! The lobe centre is also advanced by 5 degrees (+/- say... 3 degrees), but the significance of that is lost on me pending further study. Edit: measured two other random lobes, both ~7.0 to 7.2 on calipers. The nicest, shiniest unworn looking lobe was 7.0 ??

Is it reasonable or at all normal for a camshaft wear out that much? The engine ran on very loose clearances (up to 23 thou) on the exhaust side for some time, I reshimmed in Oct down to 18/19 thou and the valve train noise settled a lot. Would this wear be a symptom of those loose clearances or the cause - or is it both in a vicious cycle? In case the clearances tell a story, here's my notes from Oct:

image.thumb.png.8f48826b642b1f9728745c98638232f8.png

Here's two pictures of lobe 1. To me it looks fine?

No description available.

No description available.

My amateur eye is looking at lobe 3 and thinking that looks crap, but I would have not thought much beyond that (until now).

No description available.

 

So I assume the path forward is to get a spare factory exhaust cam or a pair of mild kelfords, and then adjustable cam gears on both sides and reshim them tight. Zip it up, back to the tuners, and miraculously find another 60+ horsepower and achieve The Goal. But what could have caused this problem to begin with?

 

Edited by CowsWithGuns

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...