Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As Dose said before, if u want to spend cash do it on more value for money stuff.

But if u have the cash this is cool, but it’s designed to sit on top of the RB25 lower shell

 

IMG_0171.jpeg

Edited by Watermouse
  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

90mm throttle body

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

7 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

Edited by Watermouse
13 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

big throttle bodies don't magically make more power.

You only need to go bigger if you have more boost pre throttle than post throttle when at WOT.

68 or 74mm DBW is more than sufficient for most people.

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

I'm running a greddy style plenum with stock throttle body on my rb30 (rb25 series 2 head) stagea, it is making 400kw through that.

There are plenty of ways to spend money on the car, you don't need to change the intake you have for 600hp

  • Like 1
18 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

Would a 74mm be fine for a Neo 25, 98 fueled 300wkw or 68 would be more appropriate?

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

11 minutes ago, R32.RB said:

Well, tell me how I can make around the 500-600hp mark with a T3 top Mount turbo if my Aeroflow 6262 .84 T4 is too big as I was going to build it for 5-600 and flex fuel and stages like boost Lvl 1 - 15 psi boost lvl 2- 20 psi boost lvl 3 27-30 psi for example 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

74mm would be good, however you will find you will need to gently ramp in the pedal vs. throttle so it feels smooth and linear (not like those silly carb V8s where you touch the throttle 1mm and the car wants to fry tyres).

This is how mine is dialled in with a 74mm DBW TB, I wanted 68mm but Plazmaman couldn't weld a 68mm flange onto the plenum.

image.thumb.png.2022a25de45c6b9ef1867c80585a0285.png

image.thumb.png.3e15a58cb641deb0ab933bf6baf9dc35.png

 

You said you want 373kW to 447kW, you don't need a 62mm turbo to do that, that turbo can spin over 500kW+

Okay I must of got my letters wrong instead of hp  I’d like to make 450-600kw i know it’s quite easy to make it on an RB I already got the turbo for free so it’s brand new the aeroflow 62 .84 T51r mod already done T4 flange can I change it to a t3

 

but please tell me how 

Is there a reason why you want close to 600kW in a R32 GTS-t?

Have you thought about suspension work, subframe changes (from a newer car, offsetting it), diff choice, brakes, gearbox?

There's a high chance you're running a RB20DET gearbox which will not like close to 600kW being sent through it.

Also a 6262 won't get you close to 600kW.

5 minutes ago, Watermouse said:

@Dose Pipe Sutututu  thank you so much, understand what u mean and appreciate that info

I think way too many people get caught up in the whole bigger TB for more power, but that's only if it becomes a restriction.

In a FI environment, the TB size is not as sensitive, where as in a NA environment, you find with the throttle at 100% and if the plenum still registers a vacuum, then your TB is undersized and requires to be upgraded.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...