Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sleepergm said:

I’m sure this has been discussed many times. But anyone have any or know someone that is selling genuine N1 rear pods? I’m still shocked no one replicates these yet. Looking to buy some. Added a photo of the part. 👍🏻

IMG_2261.png

I have heard that these are being reproduced in ABS plastic. Announcement to the public is some time in the near future.

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I have heard that these are being reproduced in ABS plastic. Announcement to the public is some time in the near future.

So your saying I should hold off on sourcing the originals. Any more specific timeline from the inside man? :) ... We talking a month or two tops?

 

And thanks

5 minutes ago, Sleepergm said:

So your saying I should hold off on sourcing the originals. Any more specific timeline from the inside man? :) ... We talking a month or two tops?

 

And thanks

https://www.instagram.com/highintakeperformance/p/C7shBy-R3zo/?img_index=2

Looks like it's official. The originals are some kind of weird foam that is pretty fragile. 

  • Like 1
35 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

https://www.instagram.com/highintakeperformance/p/C7shBy-R3zo/?img_index=2

Looks like it's official. The originals are some kind of weird foam that is pretty fragile. 

Nice just got in contact with them and thanks. 550 usd for the replica. Hoping they are top notch quality in abs material it seems. Have u worked with them before? ETA 3-4 months for everyone that wants to know. 

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

FWIW @Duncan, I think these go over the tail end of the side skirt, not as pods behind the rear arch. A bit of a stupid thing - could never understand why they exist.

5 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

FWIW @Duncan, I think these go over the tail end of the side skirt, not as pods behind the rear arch. A bit of a stupid thing - could never understand why they exist.

That is correct. My advice would be to get the top secret ones as they are top notch quality … I have them on my car now. That is for the rear spat n1 style ones.

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The Trust ones (and copies like these) seem to be what a lot of people use as rear pods.

https://justjap.com/products/jsai-aero-trust-style-rear-pods-nissan-r32-gtr?_pos=2&_sid=87e5511d7&_ss=r

Yeah I wouldn’t recommend them. I have them on mine and the fitment is horrible. I’m a perfectionist and u cant the material to bend and adapt flush. Here are photos of mine I have … after two fittings. 

8f769994-e523-4a9b-a40f-51bd991e1838.jpeg

c0487d18-edf0-4721-9aae-f600f959f5bc.jpeg

073ab83b-93ea-41ca-b674-54bc2fa70f16.jpeg

Edited by Sleepergm
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...