Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It is normal for a speedo to read 0-10% high (unfortunately), intended by manufacturers and ADRs (although not in this case) to ensure your speedo does not read low if your tyres are worn.

Speaking of which, what size tyres do you have on the rear, and what does they tyre placard say you should have? you can use this https://tiresize.com/calculator/ to determine what % difference that is causing

Personally, when I buy tyres for a car I buy a size that will bring the speedo back to being more accurate; it if it reads 5% high I buy tyres that are 5% larger diameter. If you had an electronic speed sender like R33 onwards, the other option is to add a speedo adjuster but that won't work in R32. Finally, you  might be able to find a different sized gear for the speedo sender but that will be limited to what already exists (and I don't know what sizes do)

7 hours ago, Kyer32 said:

so I need a new speedo cable 

Nope.

The seal is in the drive. A new cable would just fill up and continue to convey oil to the speedo head.

To check if this is what is happening, take the cluster out, dismantle the speedo and have a look. You probably don't even have to dismantle it. If there is oil coming up the cable, the drive into the speedo will be grossly greasy.

I had to manually (and delicately) clean the gunk out of my speedo.

On 8/1/2025 at 6:29 AM, Duncan said:

It is normal for a speedo to read 0-10% high (unfortunately), intended by manufacturers and ADRs (although not in this case) to ensure your speedo does not read low if your tyres are worn.

Speaking of which, what size tyres do you have on the rear, and what does they tyre placard say you should have? you can use this https://tiresize.com/calculator/ to determine what % difference that is causing

Personally, when I buy tyres for a car I buy a size that will bring the speedo back to being more accurate; it if it reads 5% high I buy tyres that are 5% larger diameter. If you had an electronic speed sender like R33 onwards, the other option is to add a speedo adjuster but that won't work in R32. Finally, you  might be able to find a different sized gear for the speedo sender but that will be limited to what already exists (and I don't know what sizes do)

 

1 minute ago, Kyer32 said:

My tyres are 215/45/r17 the 32 is a type m

 

On 8/1/2025 at 7:21 AM, GTSBoy said:

Nope.

The seal is in the drive. A new cable would just fill up and continue to convey oil to the speedo head.

To check if this is what is happening, take the cluster out, dismantle the speedo and have a look. You probably don't even have to dismantle it. If there is oil coming up the cable, the drive into the speedo will be grossly greasy.

I had to manually (and delicately) clean the gunk out of my speedo.

So if anything it’s be the seal speedo drive sorry it’s being awhile since I worked on one of these is the drive connected to the gearbox or behind the cluster 

Yep ! 

Cluster out first.

Dismantle.

Check for oil grease. If oil and grease = clean.

Then check seal at the drive coming from the gearbox. 

Seal broken  = change seal.

Doing it the other way around it will again push grease/oil back into the cluster and then your gonna have to do the cluster clean all over again !

 

On 7/1/2025 at 11:26 PM, GTSBoy said:

I would guess the seal has gone down at the speedo drive and gearbox oil has crept up the drive cable sheath and fouled the speedo head.

 

On 7/1/2025 at 11:32 PM, niZmO_Man said:

Your car was auto before? You have different diff ratio (auto vs manual i think? or n/a and turbo?)

 

1 minute ago, MBS206 said:

What makes you guess that tyre size specifically?

Just tried researching factory type m spec that’s all I can find 

Search for your VIN in gtr-registry.com and see what it left with from factory. There's 4.3:1 and 4.11:1 diff ratios IIRC, can't remember what models had what.

Also could be tyre size, by factory the speedo reads a tad quicker >80 km/h but constantly out be 10 km/h is weird.

Maybe someone wound the odometer back, and accidentally bumped the needle up?

1 hour ago, niZmO_Man said:

Search for your VIN in gtr-registry.com and see what it left with from factory. There's 4.3:1 and 4.11:1 diff ratios IIRC, can't remember what models had what.

Also could be tyre size, by factory the speedo reads a tad quicker >80 km/h but constantly out be 10 km/h is weird.

Maybe someone wound the odometer back, and accidentally bumped the needle up?

Well found out it’s a 60th anniversary gtst from that it came with 205-55r15

Interesting, I haven't read about the issue with oil getting into the speedo in the cluster before. I'll have to take more notice with mine.

The speedo on my R32's when I've run factory diff and tyre size have never been accurate as far as I can remember.

On 1/12/2025 at 9:44 PM, GTSBoy said:

No R32 GTSt had 15" wheels. 205/55-16 was standard GTSt fare.

4.36:1 is standard R32 turbo auto diff. I think the manual was too, not 4.11.

4.11 and 4.08 were R33 namual and auto respectively.

The non Type-M GTS-t did come with 15" 5 stud wheels and smaller brakes, but that's less than 5% of them. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...