Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm replacing the front tyres on the E39 tomorrow because one of them has a few gouges out of it. There is so much tread still on them but they're also 9 years old and the rubber is super hard. 

This falls within the guidelines of 10 years old that I've read which surprises me given their condition. 

I'm curious about whether you guys care about tyre age or just judge the tyre based on condition? How old would you consider too old?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486127-how-old-is-too-old-for-tyres/
Share on other sites

Personally I wouldn't put tyres over 4 or 5 years old on any of my own cars. Once they go hard the grip characteristics completely change. As per most things it only matters in an accident and that's when you most want them to do their job!

  • Like 2

Yeah - 4 or 5 years is the limit for decent tyres.

Pedestrian grade tyres with 400 TW ratings start out hard and don't start to suffer until they are somewhat older again. But the stickier decent stuff? Nup. My current ADO9s are < 2 yrs old, 17000km in, only have about the minimum 2mm of tread depth left, and they are.....not what they used to be. They are clearly much harder now than when new. Whether that is heat cycles (unlikely, for a road tyre), different compound between top and bottom of tread, or actually aging out (in less than 2 years!!!) is not really able to be discerned. But I'd credit actual aging as being at least part of the cause.

I've got an old pair of ~50% worn AD08Rs in the shed that I really need to get rid of. They started feeling waaaay too hard to put back on the car after a couple of years sitting there.

  • Like 1

Also, a tip for young players 

Check the dates on new tyres before they fit them, I always ask this question at the tyre shop, as they have tried to put "new" tyres on one of my cars a few years ago, but the build date was about 3 years old

  • Like 1

If the tyres were fitted when new, I wouldn't expect much over 5 years of use. Especially if the car lives outside full time. 

If the tyres had been stored under ideal conditions and are being purchased new, I'd fit a set of already 5 year old tyres if I only expected to get 1 to 2 years of use out of them. 

I've purchased many a set of new (but quite old) tyres from St George Tyres when I just needed some decent rear tyres to drift on. 

Here is a pretty crazy example, can't say I've ever bought 11 year old tyres from them before though lol. 

https://www.stgeorgetyres.com.au/momo-tyres-245-45-17-outrun-m3-official-product-by-momo-italy.html

  • Haha 2
21 hours ago, PranK said:

I'm replacing the front tyres on the E39 tomorrow because one of them has a few gouges out of it. There is so much tread still on them but they're also 9 years old and the rubber is super hard. 

This falls within the guidelines of 10 years old that I've read which surprises me given their condition. 

I'm curious about whether you guys care about tyre age or just judge the tyre based on condition? How old would you consider too old?

10 years is really pushing it. At 7-8 years you need to inspect frequently for signs of dry rot.

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

10 years is really pushing it. At 7-8 years you need to inspect frequently for signs of dry rot.

I've got 15 year old tyres on a car in my garage, holding air (holding it better than the daily driver does!) and no signs of rotting/cracking/drying out. Oh, and they've only been garaged the last 3. Before that they sat in a couple of different paddocks/yards, and even spent about a week underwater too.

However, weather and other environmental factors can really change how quickly they start to dry out and crack.

My understanding is that UV tends to accelerate the aging process. If the car has been garaged, then you could probably get away with extending beyond 10 years.

FWIW, in 2015, I had tyres on my 180B SSS that had a 3-digit code (2 for week, 1 for decade), ending in 0, so could have been more than 30 years old, but still worked fine. I did replaced them very quickly, though, once I discovered what the code meant!

Ok got some old tyres for you guys...my car has been sitting around un-driven for about 6 years now.

I had it on the original rims with the shitty compliance tyres it got it with back in 2006, which were manufactured in 2004...

Sidewalls eventually rotted and split open, obviously no air in them and the rims were holding the car up.

Just swapped them with some 17" Work rims and tyres which are probably 10+ years old too but at least holding air

IMG_20250222_165543.jpg

IMG_20250222_165617.jpg

IMG_20250222_174409~2.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
1 hour ago, Ozdavroz said:

Ok got some old tyres for you guys...my car has been sitting around un-driven for about 6 years now.

I had it on the original rims with the shitty compliance tyres it got it with back in 2006, which were manufactured in 2004...

Sidewalls eventually rotted and split open, obviously no air in them and the rims were holding the car up.

Just swapped them with some 17" Work rims and tyres which are probably 10+ years old too but at least holding air

IMG_20250222_165543.jpg

IMG_20250222_165617.jpg

IMG_20250222_174409~2.jpg

I am now intrigued to go check the dates on the tyres on my Skyline...

We need a game of who has the oldest tyre still holding a car up, and successfully holding air (for longer than a 2 weeks I feel is successful air holding).

 

I feel your tyres may be beating mine :(

2 hours ago, Ozdavroz said:

Ok got some old tyres for you guys...my car has been sitting around un-driven for about 6 years now.

I had it on the original rims with the shitty compliance tyres it got it with back in 2006, which were manufactured in 2004...

Sidewalls eventually rotted and split open, obviously no air in them and the rims were holding the car up.

Just swapped them with some 17" Work rims and tyres which are probably 10+ years old too but at least holding air

IMG_20250222_165543.jpg

IMG_20250222_165617.jpg

IMG_20250222_174409~2.jpg

Went looking at mine, reading off the tyre, presumably these are 1st week of 2003. Still hold air (I haven't had to pump them up in over 12 months!)

 

PXL_20250222_103140228.thumb.jpg.b69a72861d9be2acef7880f8d53a73c5.jpgPXL_20250222_103349285.thumb.jpg.effffed8b1e7ef751183223cb8c3e392.jpgPXL_20250222_103357847.thumb.jpg.6ae9c122892af223103c9e18656b97c9.jpg

 

I couldn't quickly find the date on the front tyres, they were fitted around 2008 to the rims, so probably not quite as old, but they have a lot more dry rot cracks in them. Still hold air. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have copied the images in the original post from photobucket to the SAU servers to make sure they stay available.
    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
×
×
  • Create New...