Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, The Bogan said:

I also think it comes down to the dollars spent for quality items, there's some cheapie versions out there, which look fine, but, there are versions of much higher quality out there, but, you obviously pay more for the quality of materials used and quality control

When I first got work done by Advan Performance on my old R33 the silicone joiners were cheapies and actually blew out on a joiner heading to the plenum, when I then took it to Unigroup they said that the silicone hoses they used and were junk, Unigroup replaced every hose on the engine with much higher quality items and from then I never had a issue with any hose

Additional cost and quality gets you quality silicone base materials and quality reinforcement fabric stuff

As for OEM rubber hoses, again, quality materials and strict quality control will give you quality hoses, but only to OEM spec, I believe using quality silicone replacements is a upgrade

I  saying this I have only dealt with vehicles I own and play with

The problem with quality is that everyone says they have it but you have to find that out yourself. Changing all hoses only for them to leak prematurely would suck.

13 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

Most hardlines are available new still. But unless they're rusted to the point of needing replacement you can just zinc or cadmium plate them to keep them going for decades to come. Regarding the turbo drains it really depends. Braided lines might be better if it's a straighter path than OEM but I would not assume braided teflon lines will never leak. Teflon is a very durable material but you can still abrade, erode, or otherwise compromise its integrity. The return hoses on the bright side are not that hard to access relative to a full turbo removal so if things go wrong you can always put it back to stock.

You can very easily drive yourself insane analyzing every little change, or maybe that's just me.

I am a fan of braided dash lines because they are so versatile and often better than alternative solutions. I do agree though that the OEM hardlines are not bad, but the hardline to rubber connections are the first point of failure.
Converting EVERYTHING to dash lines would probably be way more work than it's worth, but I think if my power steering ever leaks that will definitely go to dash lines. Or to a different power steering kit.

Unfortunately the turbo oil feed already is braided lines, I think the previous owner broke the original lines when they took the turbos off.

7 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

No, you cannot perma-bend hose once it is already made.

Alright, fair enough. Expected as much.

Just now, Duncan said:

I sourced my silicone hose kits from Just Japanese. Their current link is what I posted above but supplier might have changed over the decades. 

Possibly, yes. However the kit is apparently not including every single hose and it is out of stock too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sell it and buy something newer? 😛
    • Better then PooPooG... or is it PeePeeG? 
    • The steering wheel on my 97 s3 gtr is a little bit worn out, so im on the hunt for something mint. I notice that this type of steering wheel is on several other nissan's of the era.  Does anyone know if their all identical, or are there slight differences? I feel like gtr tax applies to anyone selling one, but if it comes from any other car the price is much less, even though its the same design.  Chat gpt says the material for the gtr is slightly different and it says gtr on the wheel, but every pic ive seen it just says nissan. 
    • I might have to say it.
    • Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
×
×
  • Create New...