Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

INASNT......

at least its a no bullshit power result....eg correct fuel said was used etc etc....car also makes nearly 480 rwhp on pump and tolulene...at 23 psi.....

cheers...

dont think i have seen many 2540s graphs over 500 rwhp... correct me if i am incorrect....

or show me....

CHEERS..

congratulations very nice power there :rofl: curious when you say forgies etc, still got standard rods or?

also how much more top end do the GT-RS have than 2530? (e.g HKS rate the 2530 at 320ps each)

anyways all that aside, congratulations, youve gotta be happy with that :rofl:

EDIT: i know id be extremely happy with 400kw off a set of low mount turbos

amaru...

je pistons, crower rods.. n1 oil pump. tomei valve springs...

power curve is close to my old 2530 setup but keeps going all the way to 8750rpm as shown in the graph...good wide power band for racing .....ha ha..

the 2530s power starts to die a bit at 7500rpm...

also have made 470 rwhp on pump at 23 psi ......

yes i am happy with that power out of any low mount turbo setup...

would have been heaps easier to throw a huge single turbo on and go silly.. but then drivability is out the door...

thanks...

443.jpg

2530s on a built engine running 2 bar.

Let's see what mph Mark pulls as comparison before calling bullshit.

The first chart did 126 mph with a suspect clutch, the second 130 mph.

Both cars were in full street trim and it was a 35 degree day.

Mark I'm glad your happy with the GT-RS's over the 2530's you use to have.

The figures for a fresh engine on inital tune are impressive!

Your Dyno run was in 5th gear, with the R34's lower ratio final drive or was it with the taller 4.111 final drive of the R33 GTR?

A 30km/hr section along the graphical ramp on your power curve, indicates a 250% increase in power.....the other two R33 graphs in the thread, do not achieve this result for any 30km/hr section.

Emre...what gear was each R33 in, when the graphs were plotted from the Dyno?

*The linear power for the first R33 starts to fall away after 150km/hr?

*The linear power for the second R33 starts to fall away before 150km/hr and almost flattens after 150km/hr?

APPLES FOR APPLES.

Power figures are not comparible...unless the cars are tested one after the other, are of the same model, have the same final drive and are in the same gear when the power run is made.

The improvements in Drivability, response and track times is where the real answer lies.

Improvement to the RB26's fuel delivery and breathibility systems, will see the 2530's becoming the limiting facter to producing ulimate/usable street power....the GT-RS's simply are the lastest design and have more headroom.

Because R34 Getrags have 5th gear = 1.000:1 ratio, just like our 5 speeds have 4th gear = 1.000:1 ratio

I gotta say though, I'm confused because those speeds at the bottom of Mark's graph are like that of 4th gear in an R34 Getrag and stock 3.545 final drive ratio :confused:

thanks jezzrr. we now have 4.11 diff gears and 5th gear is 1:1 ratio...which is a better indicator for power....

its all good... cant really notice any so called lag with the 6 speed and 4.11 gears...

cheers....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
    • Bit off topic maybe but has anyone had a crack at one of those aftermarket electric compressors ? Bit of a search came up with one put out by Speedy Air Spares. Looks interesting and looks as if you'd have to run a big arse alternator. Found this out after the fact as my air con compressor packed it in and soon after my alternator ! !
    • Yes. Needs new ports. Usually just achieved by screwing an adapter onto them. Be aware that any AC compressor that hasn't been used in a long time will very likely have dried out seals and will not hold gas. Oh, and obviously you will require a new receiver-dryer also.
×
×
  • Create New...