Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

someone has probably already said this on the thread but here goes -

don't email this person - because they are probably trawling for email addresses and will either use them themselves or on-sell them to spammers ----- :headshot: :

So - BTW - anybody that has emailed - has your spam increased???

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically that he could do just that. I'm sure the cops, ebay and the mebers of this forum would love to meet them.  

I would cut and paste it but my girlfriend has deleted it and it probably wasn't quite as polite as that :D

haha

Since he recons the car was in Germany i told him by friend was in Germany for the next 2 months and to give me the address where it is so he can check it for me before i bid on it, and i slipped in that my friend was German and a distant relative of Hitler and i could get the car from Germany to Australia by Helicopter through his connections. He still wanted a deposit for me to see it :D

Since he recons the car was in Germany i told him by friend was in Germany for the next 2 months and to give me the address where it is so he can check it for me before i bid on it, and i slipped in that my friend was German and a distant relative of Hitler and i could get the car from Germany to Australia by Helicopter through his connections. He still wanted a deposit for me to see it

PMSL! :headspin:

dam scammers is all i can say *refraining the profanity*

I really feel sorry for anyone who is caught being scammed. My work nearly bought computer software from some **** spam email, said the web site looked all professional and legit. Yeh... thats because it was a bloody graphic template purchased for $200 and some matchstick men on the other side. I think the saying of "It's too good to be true" is usually just that, not true at all, things are always priced at what they are for a reason, stolen, fake, ebay scam... wateva. It's a shame that people see something priced so low and purchase thinking "bargin".

Scams like that GTR for $15,000 blow the mind... with laughter that is...

It's a shame sniffing a scam can’t be taught standard at school... hahah

Dear Mr or Mrs Skyline Forum Member

You have been specifically selected on your fantastic post or posts in the skyline forums. This gives you the chance to win a r35 and PS3. To enter simply donate $5 into this Nigerian / Swedish bank account for your 1 / 10 change to win.

Good luck

Best Regards from us here in cuba spending you money.

Testimonial: “Joe Forreal” I entered the last competition and won! These guys are for real, if this is a testimonial on the net, it must be true! You jerk! :bahaha:”

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...