Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That Yellow R33 GTSt did a good run on the dyno. I think it was around 260Hp. I still can't get over that turbo Barina at 170 odd at the front wheels... WHY.

I reckon it was too loud. I tried to have a conversation with the head of the Soarer's club and we ended up yelling at each other and finally gave up!

Originally posted by puckish

That Yellow R33 GTSt did a good run on the dyno. I think it was around 260Hp. I still can't get over that turbo Barina at 170 odd at the front wheels... WHY.

I reckon it was too loud. I tried to have a conversation with the head of the Soarer's club and we ended up yelling at each other and finally gave up!

260 is that all??? mine has done 240 at 10psi and was expecting 270hp after mods and 12psi. Even if mine was At 270 i wasn't going to put my car on the dyno as i was a bit embarrased what i was up against. the 34GTR and i thought that yellow one was doing mid 300Hp's.....I was wrong on that one

R32GTR that was there pulled only 220 at the REARS not all 4's!!! Hmmm something wrong there maybe needs to be tuned correctly??.....!!

After hearing all that maybe i could have had a dyno run...???

looking at some of the results from the dyno it looked like it was reading low but in the same proportions as it would if all the cars went on other dyno.

but 220HP@wheels is about 220KW@engine guestimatedly, plus the purple GTR was stock.

Shaun

Originally posted by RadiuM

looking at some of the results from the dyno it looked like it was reading low but in the same proportions as it would if all the cars went on other dyno.

but 220HP@wheels is about 220KW@engine guestimatedly, plus the purple GTR was stock.

Shaun

I ran one of my old GTR's on PSI's dyno and got 220 at all four with similar mods to Skyes 32 ( zorst, pods ,boost restrictor removed ) . Doesn't sound much but they do put it ALL to the ground well.

Some of the guy's there did say the dyno was reading hard for them and were disappointed with some of the numbers.

Ken

HEHEHE maybe they aren't used to true readings:lol:

With the GTR if they disable the front wheels and have just the rear wheels then should the reading be higher? I here that there is more of a HP loss with 4WD. With the GTR it only had it's rear wheels spinning and still got 220rwhp i was thinking of a bit more than that thats all. I thinnk it represented some Mad enhancements group.....Hmmmmm didn't look all that MAD to me..... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
    • Uniclutch install vid, RB Track edition.   Highlight reel is very drive able, not noisy but still heavy with the clutch master he has.      
×
×
  • Create New...