Jump to content
SAU Community

1990 Nissan Motorsport Promo *Vid*


Recommended Posts

It was Jimmy Richards: "...this is unbelievable, I just cant believe the reception. I thought Australian race fans had a lot more going than this. This is a bloody disgrace. I'll keep racing but I tell you, this is going to remain with me for a long time. You're a pack of arseholes."

Skaife said something like: "...we lead the race all day, I cant believe this. Nissan, Winfield, we've won the race, and thats just how it is..."

But yeah, good times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give it another 14 years and you will be LOLing at the stuff we are wearing now.

Think of the poor metrosexuals!

Jim Richards called the crowd a "pack of assholes" not sure what Skaife said...

Dick Johnson got his own back when Paul Radisich won the QLD 500 while sitting in the gravel trap. Took a while though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's it! christ 14 years ago no wonder i can't remember. very comedy stuff though.

yeah metro's will look back and wonder what the hell they were thinking. he he..

then again i could look at what i was wearing yesterday and wonder what the hell i was thinking.. he he

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent promo.  

Check out the "mohawk" on the pommy guy being interviewed early on.

El Bee

Howard Marsden would not appreciate your making fun of his normaly staid "comb-over" and will put a curse your Skyline if he ever reads this :Oops: :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does anyone know the lap times of the r32 gtr around mt panorama etc?

2002

Qual: John Bowe Falcon 2.08.3873

Fastest Lap Brad Jones Falcon 2.09.5705

1992 (1992 car was a lot heavier due to parity)

Qual: 2.14,546

Fastest lap: Skaife in 2.16,47

1991

Pole position: Skaife in 2.12,63

Fastest lap: Skaife in 2.14,50

1990

Qual: 2.15,66

Fastest lap: Skaife in 2.15,46

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with calling the GTR a 2.5 litre?? lol

Scott

Schenanigans no doubt, but the rb26 is actually only 2.568 l anyway... maybe they had some advantage in the regs by losing 0.013 of a litre ;)

Wouldn't it have been great to see a le mans spec r390 doing laps of Phillip Island :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does pride well up in the ****les of your heart???

Jim Richards looks so young - and even then he wasn't a young man.

It's strange looked back now that we're owners of 'French' cars (!!!) and motorsport is such a small part of Nissan worldwide and especially Nissan Australia.

T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...