Jump to content
SAU Community

Is the 350z any good?

Terreto

By Terreto,
in General Automotive Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted
how do they respond to mods................when the price comes down they could be an interesting sight

well, they are a fairly hard tuned n/a engine from the factory....my guess is they will suck for mods compared to say, a skyline where we just turn the b00st up :P

Ours loves teh pod, but I haven't had a chance to do back to back dyno testing yet

There's exhausts and such around but we haven't tried one. Or of course you could chuck on a $15000 twin turbo kit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted
If i had a choice, i would buy one just for everyday driving, unmodded. Otherwise i would choose something else.

Also heard the 350z was uncomfortable to ride in :P

same answer as the 2 seater comment....you of course know you are buying a car with sporty suspension and not a lexus. yes it has firm suspension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tosh Grand Master

Tosh

Posted
Posted

Duncan, you and I both know the R32 GTR brakes are not a "DIRECT" bolt on :P

the only thing you will need to do is to re-tap the 2 bolt holes on the caliper as the 350Z uses a slightly larger thread than the R32 GTR

Link to comment
Share on other sites
funkymonkey Grand Master

funkymonkey

Posted
Posted

test drove both the convertible and the regular models thanks to a mate that works in a nissan dealership. the convertible for obvious reasons feels a lot more heavier than the regular.

i didn't get to drive the track version, which i'd have liked to... so as for the regular version, i've gotta say it handles pretty good and is pretty torque down low in the power band. it does sound a lil tinny with a factory exhaust, but who keeps it factory.

I reckon a track version (which is supposed to have better handling and lighter rims etc etc) with a good exhaust, extracters and throttle bodies will make it a pretty gutsy N/A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Timmy G Proficient

Timmy G

Posted
Posted
Top Gear is a good, but biased, show. If a car isn't British they tend to find a lot of niggling things wrong with it.  

I was thinking of buying one recently so I spoke to a few dealers and no-one could get me one to test drive. I was pretty keen so I went and saw them at the Nissan dealer so they could know I was serious, the girl phoned around for 2 weeks trying to get me a track, 6mt, coupe for a drive but no luck.

In the end i forgot about the 350 and went with something else.

Oh that and they wanted $91k for a Track, Manual with Sat Nav, factory option Bilsteins and dealer option Nismo LMGT4 18" rims.

$91k!!! - F that.

they always pay out on rover, that is english. i have watched a lot of top gear and i've not noticed any british bias. they always treat jap cars as second rate though imo, it's like the "always trying to live up to the big european brother" type syndrome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lwells Grand Master

lwells

Posted
Posted
Rover is crap though..............they dont pay out on MG which is the non-budget arm of rover (in a way) the rover 75 got good reviews............

Exactly, although they don't really have a go at Rover cars, more rover management.

Clarkson is most certainly biased. If its british (*cough* Aston, Jaguar *cough*) he loves it and prattles on about British cars being the best in the world.

Anyway, back on to the 350Z :P

LW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Timmy G Proficient

Timmy G

Posted
Posted
Exactly, although they don't really have a go at Rover cars, more rover management.

Clarkson is most certainly biased. If its british (*cough* Aston, Jaguar *cough*) he loves it and prattles on about British cars being the best in the world.

Anyway, back on to the 350Z :P

LW.

I like clarkson, he's funny. Anyway, look at Motor/Wheels magazine. They rate Holden Commonwhores and Fords Falcons which SUCK - sorry no apologies for starting this fire!

Both cars have good features on paper, but why on earth would you buy one for yourself (fleet cars are okay - you don't always get a choice)?!?!? They are 2/3 the price of an equiv Euro car with similar features but it FALLS APART within a year and just gets worse and worse.

My 2c.

-Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aybee Experienced

aybee

Posted
Posted

i couldnt read that autospeed article!

it sounded like he had already made up his mind about the car before driving it. as if he has a chip on his shoulder that the car is not real sports car because it is 'trendy' at the moment.

bullshit journalism!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lwells Grand Master

lwells

Posted
Posted
I like clarkson, he's funny.  Anyway, look at Motor/Wheels magazine.  They rate Holden Commonwhores and Fords Falcons which SUCK - sorry no apologies for starting this fire!

-Tim

Sure he is funny. But do you want to buy a car on the basis of the reviewer being funny, or based on factual information? Justifying it by pointing out that other publications/reviewers are biased doesn't exactly take away from the fact that Clarkson, funny as he may be, is not a good driver and not a good reviewer.

/rant

LW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Timmy G Proficient

Timmy G

Posted
Posted
Sure he is funny. But do you want to buy a car on the basis of the reviewer being funny, or based on factual information? Justifying it by pointing out that other publications/reviewers are biased doesn't exactly take away from the fact that Clarkson, funny as he may be, is not a good driver and not a good reviewer.

/rant

LW.

yeah you have a point. i watch top gear to check out the cars not really for buying opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lwells Grand Master

lwells

Posted
Posted
yeah you have a point.  i watch top gear to check out the cars not really for buying opinions.

Despite my critiscms, I watch it too mostly because its entertaining. However, I don't like the fact that it proports to provide factual "reviews", like the one of the 350Z.

LW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Glut Rookie

Glut

Posted
Posted
i couldnt read that autospeed article!

it sounded like he had already made up his mind about the car before driving it. as if he has a chip on his shoulder that the car is not real sports car because it is 'trendy' at the moment.  

bullshit journalism!

Hmmm... ragging on an article you haven't read, soley because it doesn't like a car you do. hmmm... I'll start snickering now.

For your benefit, however I've pasted the last parts of the article for you:

Why you would:

   * Good smooth road handling

   * Excellent performance

   * Attracts lots of attention

   * Good equipment level, including six airbags

Why you wouldn't:

   * Loud and coarse

   * Very poor ride on all but good surfaces

   * Handling on poor roads is bad

   * Very poor luggage and oddments spaces

and a nice quote from earlier in the article:

It's for drivers who want to feel the experience ...  OTOH, if you'd rather go just as fast - both in a straight line and around corners - and have more room, comfort and quietness, better grip and a vastly better ride, there are other cars that are much more highly recommended.

IMHO they're a very unbiased source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Well my 2yen is that autospeed are really not car enthusiasts, despite running a car magazine....the author of that article drive an ls400 so that gives you an idea of the sort of barge they like.

Which is fine by me.

But I want something interesting, quick, decent handling. I don't particularly care about smoothness of the ride or how many suitcases I can fit in it....and as a result we went with the 350z and are very happy with it :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laurence Mentor

Laurence

Posted
Posted

Mr Autospeed got burnt with leasing an aussie spec R32 GT-R and has become bitter and twisted.

Also he likes WRX's and well, if you like that then a proper car wouldn't really be your thing.

The only problem I see with the 350Z is that I would like the VQ35 to rev a bit harder. It seems a shame to have to crack open the engine straight away! Oh and the wanky diff thing. But then again, Porsche use it on all their 911's without "GT" in the name and they go alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nightmare_mistress_R33
      CD009 RB Conversion

      By Nightmare_mistress_R33 · Posted

      I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Beanie
      Hello from the UK

      By Beanie · Posted

      Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Beanie
      Hello from the UK

      By Beanie · Posted

      Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • r32-25t
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By r32-25t · Posted

      Buy one
    • GTSBoy
      A little PU bush story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...