Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You have increased all the air flow systems and have not (or the ECU has not ) increased fuel flow. Or maybe it has but you have other issues as well.

I would replace the fuel filter as the easy first step, then check the pump filter.

Then check your injector duty cycle and fuel pressure.(is it rising with boost?)

You did not say what power you were making but it's obviously starting to get well over stock where more fuel is needed to keep the A/F ratio correct.

yeah i have a remapped ecu chip which actually has better a/f ration than my previous one as my previous ecu chip was a mines one...i set my boost on 15psi, the guy didnt bother boosting it all the way and revving it all the way coz he said i could blow the engine coz it was alreayd too lean ... yeah the a/f ration was getting more lean as the boost was climbing... so yeah thats wat they guy said it could be my fuel pump or regulator as i have a fuel regulator and its adjusted already to 45psi....so yeah he siad it most probably is the fuel pump....if it is wat pump u reckon i can get ? i was told the bosch 044 is the way to go....

You answered 1 of my questions, dude its pretty hard to narrow down the problem with out the facts, but from what you have given me it could be a number of things. blocked injectors, fuel pump & too much boost - 15psi is too high for stock fuel system.

Try a bosch 044 pump if that doesnt fix your problem then you need bigger injectors or to get them flow tested.

sorry the a/f on idle was 20, when on, low revs it was on 14/15 then as it was boosting higer and revving higher so did the a/f ratio, it hit 16/17 and they guy dynoing my car stopped coz he said it was too dangerous to push it more...it only hit 180 hp when he stopped it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd suggest the answer to the first question is at least a qualified "yes". I'll come back to that. Pineapples just don't do a lot to solidify the mounting of the subframe. They do a little bit, and that little bit was clearly helpful to me in the past, but the main thing they are intended to be used for is to tip the orientation of the subframe to try to either dial in more or less anti-squat. You can install them one way to try to increase launch traction, or the other way to try to increase lateral grip (at the notional expense of longitudinal traction). Or, as I did, you install them neutral, which only really offers a little bit of "snugging" up of the subframe. When I did pineapples, that was the only option. No-one had a machined alloy collar like the GKTech ones. There were some other options, but nothing like the slip in collars. And it is clear from looking at them that they occupy almost all the free space inside the rubber bush, so they will do a lot to stop them moving internally. So I thought, "that's the game for me!". Obviously the next/adjacent step is poly bushes, but what's the point in doing that with all the work and hassle required to change them over, when jamming (and I mean literally jamming) some alloy into the rubber bushes probably gives an equivalent, or possibly even superior result? So, to go back to your 1st question, I would suggest, for the investment of <<$100 and a morning spent lying under the car swearing and getting some sore fingers, it is certainly something you should try. Who knows? Maybe your situation is so severe that it doesn't solve it. But it might help a lot. If your problem is as severe as you say it is, the next thing to look at is what the rest of the bushes in the rear end a made from. Things like the Hardrace arms with hardened rubber bushes might be a good thing (for the purposes of having adjustability AND stiffer bushes). Otherwise, just poly bushes throughout could be a help. Or following in my fever dream footsteps and putting a lot of sphericals into the rear? Eliminate undersired movement to avoid the build up of resonances that cause the tramp. Also, if you have adjustable uppers in the rear, and you haven't put effort into adjusting the traction arms to minimise bump steer, there might be some advantage in that. If you don't want to go to the effort of doing it yourself (like I am pretty much forced to in Adelaide, owing to a lack of race alignment specialists) then surely there's a place in Melbs that is able to do it. It will cost $$, But that's life.
    • As someone who has pineapples, and horrible axle tramp... should I change these to collars? Is that what you're saying here? Why did you choose these instead of getting pineapples where you said you had good experiences of? I'd love to even attempt to get rid of axle tramp, I either get complete bogginess or absolute insane wheelspin, anything even remotely in between results in filling-removal axle tramp, to the point where launching the car is just not something I do.
    • Lucky for that, because putting ethanol in fuel only lowers the bulk cost of fuel if it's in 91 Add it to 98, 85% of it even and it quintuples in price. Strange physics. f**k you United, Gouging c***ts.
    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...