Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am about to spend some hard earned on larger in jectors for my RB20DET.

At the moment they go to lunch (100%) at about 6200. This is OK as the engine doesn't hurt its self and we run it fairly conservative up top anyhow. However, we are giving the old girl her circuit race debut next month and this will mean much more WOT.

I want a drop in replacement, keeping in mind that she might be getting a 2.4 cubes to satify soon.

Thanks for your help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51174-injectors-where-to-now/
Share on other sites

Depending on how much power you plan to make should be the guide, but I think that RX7 hi impedance units flow 550cc and drop straight in.

The standard plugs will also connect as long as you cut the small plastic keyway from inide the inj. socket - takes a few min with a boxcutter. :D

At least this is what I have done to my RB20 and looking for 250kW which these inj. would handle.

Thanks G,

I had heard the RX type were drop in's. I think the std ones I have are about 280, so 550 should be ample. We will run between 200 - 230rwkw I expect. Have seen 212rwkw, but thought we had better pull back a bit till we got a few things "safer"

I have no idea what the 2.4 will do, but I am mainly looking for mid-range anyhow..

Do you have a ball park on price for those injectors?

Tom

Why not go GTR injectors?My car idles and drives the same when it had the tiny RB20 ones.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...?t=34332&page=1

Tom, on reflection I think the above advice is probably best, as I have seen GTR Inj. for sale around $350 and I paid $110 EACH for my RX7's Used but Cleaned Etc. :Oops:

Two years ago it seemed reasonable but not now! :P

i have a set of 550cc NipponDenso (blue) injectors that used to be on my RB20 with AP Eng Power FC. Was running a HKS GT2530, >200rwkw. Highest I ever saw the duty cycle reach was about sixty something % at WOT on circuit. Plenty of room for a bigger turbo. If running PFC and using low impedence injectors, u'll need a GT-R resistor pack. Don't think going the RX7 injector route is good - i tried before, had issues.

p.s. I'm selling both the injectors (only done 1500kms) and resistor pack on FS forums if anyone's interested :P

Hi TT, we run the Series V RX7 Injectors, I had to buy 8 to get 6 good ones, good ones are had to find now. If you needed the extra capacity (560 cc's versus 420 cc's on our flow bench ) then it would be a better route that the GTR injectors. You don't need resistors to match them to the RB20 Power FC. The GTR injectors are good for around 265 rwkw, so they will suite your purposes perfectly. Get them cleaned and flowed as usual, there are variations as with all injectors. I always put the highest flowing one in #6, next in #5.

Hope that helps :D

Why not buy a Malpassi adjustable regulator, and up the fuel pressure. You are probably running a bit under 3bar fuel pressure, I believe you can fairly safely run up to around 4bar.

Why not buy a Malpassi adjustable regulator, and up the fuel pressure. You are probably running a bit under 3bar fuel pressure, I believe you can fairly safely run up to around 4bar.

The fuel pump is rated at 73.5 psi, if you run 4 bar (59 psi) fuel pressure that only leaves 14.5 psi for boost. I think TT needs more than 1 bar of boost. :D

Hi TT, we run the Series V RX7 Injectors, I had to buy 8 to get 6 good ones, good ones are had to find now.  If you needed the extra capacity (560 cc's versus 420 cc's on our flow bench ) then it would be a better route than the GTR injectors.  You don't need resistors to match them to the RB20 Power FC.  The GTR injectors are good for around 265 rwkw, so they will suite your purposes perfectly.  Get them cleaned and flowed as usual, there are variations as with all injectors.  I always put the highest flowing one in #6, next in #5.

Hope that helps :D

Had always thought RX7 were the go... had read many forums in the past, but when you are doing other programs it is all information that wont fit on my nearly full hard drive (I had to forget my parents names so I could remember to change gears in a manual again).

Will start the search now...

TT

PS: Had some joy with dump skyd, even though deal not yet closed.

Sorry for jumping in but SK did you say that with the power fc on a rb20 you dont need the resistor pack for the gtr injectors????, I may have read wrong tho.

Nathan

Hi Nathan either you read it wrong, or I wrote it wrong. You definitely need high impedance with the RB20DET Power FC, so if you use low impedance injectors (as in GTR) you need to increase the impedance. You can do that by using the GTR resister pack or by using individual resisters at the injectors.

Hope that clarifies :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...