Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For people who are wanting 200rwkw out of their "stockish" RB25DET heres something to consider. The dyno graphs below represent my car on 2 different dynos.

The first one was done December 03 on a 20degC day and made 153rwkw. Mods were:

* bleed valve @ 13psi

* Chipped stock R33 ECU

* Turbo back zorst (with crppy compliance cat)

* K&N panel filter

bmt.jpg

The sencond one was done June 04 on a 10 deg day and made 195rwkw.

selectmaz.jpg

For a bit of fun, lets see if you can tell me where the extra 42rwkw came from :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51206-want-200rwkw-out-of-a-stockish-r33/
Share on other sites

come on dude, tell us.

I am on my way, just waiting for the tune now. The Powerfc on factory maps = 200km out of a tank.

I have -

Split Dump all the wat to the Cat

Hi Flow Cat

3"5 Exhaust, 4 inch Cannon

Front Mount Intercooler (stock plenum and BOV)

Partitioned Pod Filter

HKS Exhaust cam Pulley (not fitted yet)

Apexi Power FC + Hand Controller

Bleed Valve set at 10psi

18" 235 Treads

10% Mix of Toluene

Stock Turbo

Currently on about 150rwkw

Aiming for 200 - 210rwkw after the Tune. Apparently its very possible.

ones a dyno dynamics.. the other is the dynologics.. and lets guess that the dynodynamics might be in shootout mode correct? and maybe has some temp correction thrown in for good measure..

do i get some candy?

good pratical illustration though rigga :thumbsup:

That’s why people who trying and argue, that their car is faster because it puts out more power on a dyno. Is a load of bull. I have seen similar cases of a car on one dyno putting out 320hp and on a different dyno putting out 360hp. With nothing changed to the car.

If people say that their car is quicker because it puts out more power then mine I laugh. The argument stop on the ROAD!! You could have a car that does 700hp between 7 – 8k rpm and a 300hp car with a power range of 4 – 7k rpm I reckon the 300hp car would beat it over a ¼ mile. But the guy with the 700hp car can still claim that he’s is quicker because his car puts out 400hp more……. ???? Am I right in saying that ?

In other wirds RiggaP has shown a good example of that, Cheers Mate.

Gordy, Quite easy really:D Shootout mode dyno provide a list of details at the bottom of the screen, which records intake temps, ambient temps etc. Shootout mode 2003 has green writing down the bottom, but this is no longer current. Shootout mode 2004 has blue writing and has an '04 logo. These dyno can no longer be manipulated to provide higher readings.

Shootout mode dyno provide a list of details at the bottom of the screen, which records intake temps, ambient temps, yada, yada, yada

yup, I sort of know that :thumbsup: - but I was thinking maybe rigga had photoshopped these details out to make it another interesting point of discussion.. which it is already :)

I have noticed this over time the extra details on each printout. As part of their dyno "subscription" (purchase/rental/lease?) are the dyno operators required to get the new software with each update.. or is it optional?

Take it to a Shootout dyno to get consistant results.

Common, you know that's not true, I can get perfectly consistent results running a DD not in Shootout Mode. After all, I can set the parameters exactly the same as Shootout mode, the only difference is that they are locked and displayed. That does not mean that they are not set correctly. I believe that the Shootineers Code of Conduct is far more important to consistency than a piece of software.

Sorry, that might sound a bit harsh, but I am getting a bit tired of DD shoving Shootot mode down everybody's neck as if it's the be all and end all of dyno's. :thumbsup:

The cat.

Correct. This was the only mod done between dyno runs.

ones a dyno dynamics.. the other is the dynologics..

Also correct, and forms the very reason.

So heres my point; Dynos are a tuning tool. Anyone chasing a dyno figure is missing the point IMO. As my example has pointed out, you could achieve 150rwkw at one place then have another place "retune" the car and achieve 195 without effectively doing anything. I'm not sure anyone with half a twit is going to argue you can get 42rwkw by adding a high flow cat.

A dyno figure is not going to give you any idea how fast the car is going to be, and because of this, dont mean squat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not really, no. Anything you would do is easily reversible.
    • I would like more noise related info for my truly uneducated guess  Does it do it at idle or when revving, clutch engaged, and disengaged? Does it only do it when the car is moving? I've heard "similar" noises from a clutch pack that left the chat room, and CV joints that have chewed themselves out But as Matt said, how's the yokes, tailshaft and centre bearing going after their last little issue Fingers crossed it is something simple  Weird noises make me cringe 
    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
×
×
  • Create New...