Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For people who are wanting 200rwkw out of their "stockish" RB25DET heres something to consider. The dyno graphs below represent my car on 2 different dynos.

The first one was done December 03 on a 20degC day and made 153rwkw. Mods were:

* bleed valve @ 13psi

* Chipped stock R33 ECU

* Turbo back zorst (with crppy compliance cat)

* K&N panel filter

bmt.jpg

The sencond one was done June 04 on a 10 deg day and made 195rwkw.

selectmaz.jpg

For a bit of fun, lets see if you can tell me where the extra 42rwkw came from :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51206-want-200rwkw-out-of-a-stockish-r33/
Share on other sites

come on dude, tell us.

I am on my way, just waiting for the tune now. The Powerfc on factory maps = 200km out of a tank.

I have -

Split Dump all the wat to the Cat

Hi Flow Cat

3"5 Exhaust, 4 inch Cannon

Front Mount Intercooler (stock plenum and BOV)

Partitioned Pod Filter

HKS Exhaust cam Pulley (not fitted yet)

Apexi Power FC + Hand Controller

Bleed Valve set at 10psi

18" 235 Treads

10% Mix of Toluene

Stock Turbo

Currently on about 150rwkw

Aiming for 200 - 210rwkw after the Tune. Apparently its very possible.

ones a dyno dynamics.. the other is the dynologics.. and lets guess that the dynodynamics might be in shootout mode correct? and maybe has some temp correction thrown in for good measure..

do i get some candy?

good pratical illustration though rigga :thumbsup:

That’s why people who trying and argue, that their car is faster because it puts out more power on a dyno. Is a load of bull. I have seen similar cases of a car on one dyno putting out 320hp and on a different dyno putting out 360hp. With nothing changed to the car.

If people say that their car is quicker because it puts out more power then mine I laugh. The argument stop on the ROAD!! You could have a car that does 700hp between 7 – 8k rpm and a 300hp car with a power range of 4 – 7k rpm I reckon the 300hp car would beat it over a ¼ mile. But the guy with the 700hp car can still claim that he’s is quicker because his car puts out 400hp more……. ???? Am I right in saying that ?

In other wirds RiggaP has shown a good example of that, Cheers Mate.

Gordy, Quite easy really:D Shootout mode dyno provide a list of details at the bottom of the screen, which records intake temps, ambient temps etc. Shootout mode 2003 has green writing down the bottom, but this is no longer current. Shootout mode 2004 has blue writing and has an '04 logo. These dyno can no longer be manipulated to provide higher readings.

Shootout mode dyno provide a list of details at the bottom of the screen, which records intake temps, ambient temps, yada, yada, yada

yup, I sort of know that :thumbsup: - but I was thinking maybe rigga had photoshopped these details out to make it another interesting point of discussion.. which it is already :)

I have noticed this over time the extra details on each printout. As part of their dyno "subscription" (purchase/rental/lease?) are the dyno operators required to get the new software with each update.. or is it optional?

Take it to a Shootout dyno to get consistant results.

Common, you know that's not true, I can get perfectly consistent results running a DD not in Shootout Mode. After all, I can set the parameters exactly the same as Shootout mode, the only difference is that they are locked and displayed. That does not mean that they are not set correctly. I believe that the Shootineers Code of Conduct is far more important to consistency than a piece of software.

Sorry, that might sound a bit harsh, but I am getting a bit tired of DD shoving Shootot mode down everybody's neck as if it's the be all and end all of dyno's. :thumbsup:

The cat.

Correct. This was the only mod done between dyno runs.

ones a dyno dynamics.. the other is the dynologics..

Also correct, and forms the very reason.

So heres my point; Dynos are a tuning tool. Anyone chasing a dyno figure is missing the point IMO. As my example has pointed out, you could achieve 150rwkw at one place then have another place "retune" the car and achieve 195 without effectively doing anything. I'm not sure anyone with half a twit is going to argue you can get 42rwkw by adding a high flow cat.

A dyno figure is not going to give you any idea how fast the car is going to be, and because of this, dont mean squat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry no - The sandtrap adventure ended the day, happened at the end of the last session. At that time I wasn't hearing any weird noises nor were the brakes shuddering anymore. It was only when watching the videos that I remembered I had these sounds early on!
    • Did the noise appear after your sand trap adventure? Could be something got dislodged and is playing rub rub. Even a rock wedged somewhere.
    • Is there a shroud around the tailshaft spline into the back of the box? They can rub and make a horrible noise if they are not on straight/damaged. The heat might have caused it to grow too much in one direction and rub.
    • Strangely I noticed it either disappear later in the day, or not be present. I definitely noticed when I was crawling around that open wheel thingy entering the pits (that part was audible in car). Driving home and commuting around town for example, I didn't hear it. It's plausible that it was a brake disc or something still slightly in contact. The brakes absolutely felt BAD for the first couple of sessions, huge amounts of shudder and grinding as they got up to temp - And then I actually just forgot about it as the day went on/didn't notice it. The videos were from the morning when this was more present than the afternoon/drive home when it wasn't. I've asked around and got a variety of responses including handbrake shoe contacting hub, CV joints, CB tailshaft bearing as above, and clutch input bearing. I didn't test if it disappeared when clutch was in. I haven't noticed it in any of the other videos nor did I notice it when driving to that extent. More or less hoping the microphone at the rear license plate giving some kind of clue of 'something' but it looks like "spin stuff and see if you can notice it" is the way forward here. I could be smart and use the gopro mic and re-mount it to that location to see if the sound is still present at low speed actually. Sounds like a decent test whenver I have the CBF'ness to drive the car again. Given it's almost 40C for the day of the track day and the next 3 days after, the CBF is high. All I've done since getting home is unpack the car, remove the remnants of the lip and undertray and left it there. I was surprised how well the PMU Club Racers actually worked. The brake performance on the track was absolutely fantastic, best I've ever personally used, no fade whatsoever and the bitiness was almost too good, I was scrubbing more speed off than I needed to, but I also ended up infield when I started trying to scrape off ... less speed.... so...
    • Not really, no. Anything you would do is easily reversible.
×
×
  • Create New...