Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was wondering if anyone can help me with buying the turbo for r33gtst. The spec of the turbo is T3/T04b rate 450hp- Compressor 50mm trim, 0.5 A/R, Turbine-0.48A/R. would the A/R on the turbine be too small?

I would be very much appreciated for any comments before i buy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52159-t3t04b-selection-for-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

Sounds like a very mixed up description . TO4B .50 AR comp covers are thin on the ground and too small anyway , rarely will you hear of a TO4B comp wheel described by its trim number . They normally are given a letter ie S trim , V trim , H trim . If its got eight blades its lag then surge city . If you must use TO4B wheels use only the six blade versions ie H trim .

It sounds more like a T3/TO4E hybrid to me . With the turbine side look to see what kind of exhaust housing it has . If its a Nissan / Garrett T3 ie Z-18T or FJ20ET don't touch it with a barge poll , these used a turbine with a smaller major diameter than the Ford style T3 . They cannot develop the shaft torque required to drive TO4B/E compressors . OEM Garrett used TBO3 turbine sides for ther own TA34's wich is the correct name for the T3/TO4E factory hybrid . The TA34 turbines are the ones everyone loves to call Sierra Dash 1/2/3 or Turbonetics stage 1/2/3 . In a propper Garrett "Five Bolt" exhaust housing they work reasonably well . You will note that the TA34 turbos did not use large trim TO4E comp wheels ie 50/54/57/60 trims because they knew they were light on turbine power . I once saw lists of 40 and 46 trim versions . Fred from Turbo Logic (Port Kembla) said he used to sell smaller trim versions of these to the RB20 brigade and they boosted from 1800 to I think 7000 . There is a .58AR turbine housing version which should be a torque animal and a .63 AR version with the largest turbine trim . If its none of these I'd reckon that someone is selling you their problem . Be VERY wary of Joe petrol head's custom job . I can't say that everything Garrett's ever made is brilliant but at least they try with propper test facilities .

The biggest drama is that lots of parts interchange but only the CORRECT combination gives a worthwhile result . I believe this is why there are no spares available for the GTBB turbos . Why would anyone pay squillions for HKS spec Garrett GTBB's if they could assemble there own .

Thanks your your help mate. I was given two of the options below.

Options

1.T3 To4b. The compressor wheel is a to4b 50 trim and the compressor housing is a 50ar. The turbine side is a 48ar with a standard T3 flange. 450hp

2. T3/T4E hybrid. It has a 57 trim compressor wheel,50AR compressor housing and 63AR turbine housing with a stage three turbine wheel. 550hp

note that in option 1 i was qouted with (50trim & 0.5A/R) and (54 trim & 0.6A/R). i will call him to confirm which ones! if it's the 54mm trim & 0.6A/R would it be OK then?

would the option two be the way to go? i dont want it too laggy.

thanks mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...