Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

as some of you may know, Christian and Myself are building up a Datsun 240K (remember the 2000GT-R?), for an on road charity rally next year, then it will be a bit of a showcar and hopefully track car (if we work out the inherent understeer). The car needs to be street registered.

The car is a 1974 Datsun 240K GL, with a 2.4L carby engine

our plans for it include

RB30E with twincam head (RB25DE) and (probably an initially small RB20DET Turbo)

RB20DET RB25DET or MX7 gearbox

300ZX front brakes, R31 Skyline rear brakes

ECU of some description...

now my questions are to do with getting the engine engineered (all by the books!) and registered with the RTA.

I have done a lot of looking around in the past few days, and i can only assume, all those with twin cam mods (VL's and some of us) etc.. are keeping shush about having their cars engineered. I would prefer to know as much background as i can before enlisting the advice of an engineer, as from what i have heard, some can be rather lazy and prefer to just say things can't be done (as it causes them more paperwork).

1) ECU's.. well, i managed to get an R33 RB25DE head, not an R32 head which means we should simply have to use an r33 RB25DE loom and ecu to get it to work properly (assuming the turbo runs off a seperate boost controller etc..)..

This means we won't be able to tune the car to bed in/ run properly, so the only solution (rather than dropping the idea for a simple RB20DET swap, andything more is starting to get $$$$$) i can see is to fit an aftermarket ECU (i can hear the tiny pitterpatter of engineers feet running away as i speak!).

I don't mind having the car tuned and set up to pass emmisions tests (apparently they are free from EPARTA in Penrith and Botany?) if that is what we have to do, as long as it isn't going to cost us megabucks, but i know the RTA and engineers can be very negative towards aftermarket ECU's (i assume it is more paperwork).. I have heard that if they are tamperproof (ie. the owner can not self modify the ecu, it may be okay, perhaps a password etc.), can anyone confirm? and does any one know what ecu's will allow for this (Motech? Autronic?)?

the thought of running a hidden ecu has crossed my mind, but i am pretty keen on having this thing absolutely by the books!

2) Emmisions gear.. with an RB30 block, and an RB25DE head, what emmissions gear do we need to fit? from what i can make out, it is pretty much only the charcoal cannister (and exhaust of course)

hopefully there is someone out there that can help us with a little bit of advise, i don't want to give up the RB30DET dream unless i really am forced to.

Kent

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52181-engineering-the-240k-with-rb30det/
Share on other sites

I am not familiar with the engineers laws but can say that not all ECU's are legal. A car must run in a closed loop.. but most aftermarket ecus run in open loop (did I get that right) so they wont pass emissions.

That said my mate put a ecu and new engine into a mighty boy and had no issues.

The RTA website has a shit load of intomation on it. I would start there..

Dont give up the dream dude..

Thanks carlo, something else to add to the ecu shopping list.. so far i have down

6 ignition outputs (don't want to run wasted spark)

6 injector drivers

closed loop

password protected

(at this stage it looks like the only one to match is EMS 8860, after the next software version to cover the 6 ign drivers)

from what i can work out, the powerfc can't be password protected, and can be therefore changed by the owner (through the powerfc)

hence why they wouldn't be accepted.. mind you i have also heard that some won't accept aftermarket ecu's even if they are password protected (and the owner has no clue what it is).. not sure if this is because they are lazy

Kent

powerfc can be password protected, from my understanding its done with the powerexcel software...dunno if the datalogit can do it, also i think theres someone else on these forums who has a rb30det and using the ap engineering r32 gtst power fc running that.

yea there are a few, but from all the bits i have already collected (wiring and sensors etc) it will just be easier to cut into an aftermarket ECU (i have to redo the wiring in the datsun anyway) than to convert everything to rb20det bits and pieces

no your not wasting my time at all!,

I looked into doing that, but seeing as we already have an rb25de engine and loom with the majority of sensors we will need, it seemed a lot simpler than having to work out what sensors needed to be found to get the rb20det loom up and running (besides the power fc for rb20det costs just as much as an aftermarket system anyways). i even went down the path of looking at buying an rb20det halfcut so we would have everything then we could sell parts off that we didn't use, but it just turned out to be too expensive.. and there are LOTS of other things to spend money on! (and the temptation to just throw the rb20det would be too great!)

it would be nice to get the rb20det powerfc working, i think it would just complicate things alot more for us (not something we really need with the little experience we have and the huge job ahead :rofl:)

the other option may be to try and hook up an rb25det powerfc, though i have no idea what i would need to do to get the r33 rb25de engine and loom to match.

did the r33 come without vvt (variable cam thingi) that might cause probs with the r33 ecu since the rb25de head didnt come with it??? or it did???

I dunno i've u've seen this.... think it was a fast fours which had done a rb25det from a r34 into a 240 if my memory serves me right......you seen that, could provide some help there..??..

good luck dude, should be a nice ride when complete!!!

I dunno i've u've seen this.... think it was a fast fours which had done a rb25det from a r34 into a 240 if my memory serves me right......you seen that, could provide some help there..??..

Hey guys, this prompted a memory of an old magazine I have, Feb/March 1997 ZOOM extreme performance magazine Volume 1 No.6. Article by Julian Edgar.

This issue has PART 3 of Project Skyline, An RB20DET into a C210 (~1979) Skyline Coupe. 7~8 pages on wiring up the engine!!.

Any other magazine horders out there , check your stash for other issues with this project. Probably started late in 1996.

I can drop it off at Kents if needed

Jim.

Wow, what a fantastic find! i would be especially gratefull if anyone has the section on installing the gearbox into that car (especially hooking up the speedo/tacho)

Jim, i will contact you and come up to yours to pick it up soon? anyone else if you have a copy, please scan it in and email it to me! [email protected]

thanks!

Any further progress on the engineering?

I am in japan at the moment but have a similar project sitting at home in melbourne, waiting to hear whats legal before I purchase an ECU here. I will get a friend to do some anonymous phone calls to vicroads and any engineers but would like to hear what you guys find from the relevant authorities. I have search for months and the best available info is only heresay, very few people actually get in touch with the authorites and even less post info on a successfully engineered car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...