Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

as some of you may know, Christian and Myself are building up a Datsun 240K (remember the 2000GT-R?), for an on road charity rally next year, then it will be a bit of a showcar and hopefully track car (if we work out the inherent understeer). The car needs to be street registered.

The car is a 1974 Datsun 240K GL, with a 2.4L carby engine

our plans for it include

RB30E with twincam head (RB25DE) and (probably an initially small RB20DET Turbo)

RB20DET RB25DET or MX7 gearbox

300ZX front brakes, R31 Skyline rear brakes

ECU of some description...

now my questions are to do with getting the engine engineered (all by the books!) and registered with the RTA.

I have done a lot of looking around in the past few days, and i can only assume, all those with twin cam mods (VL's and some of us) etc.. are keeping shush about having their cars engineered. I would prefer to know as much background as i can before enlisting the advice of an engineer, as from what i have heard, some can be rather lazy and prefer to just say things can't be done (as it causes them more paperwork).

1) ECU's.. well, i managed to get an R33 RB25DE head, not an R32 head which means we should simply have to use an r33 RB25DE loom and ecu to get it to work properly (assuming the turbo runs off a seperate boost controller etc..)..

This means we won't be able to tune the car to bed in/ run properly, so the only solution (rather than dropping the idea for a simple RB20DET swap, andything more is starting to get $$$$$) i can see is to fit an aftermarket ECU (i can hear the tiny pitterpatter of engineers feet running away as i speak!).

I don't mind having the car tuned and set up to pass emmisions tests (apparently they are free from EPARTA in Penrith and Botany?) if that is what we have to do, as long as it isn't going to cost us megabucks, but i know the RTA and engineers can be very negative towards aftermarket ECU's (i assume it is more paperwork).. I have heard that if they are tamperproof (ie. the owner can not self modify the ecu, it may be okay, perhaps a password etc.), can anyone confirm? and does any one know what ecu's will allow for this (Motech? Autronic?)?

the thought of running a hidden ecu has crossed my mind, but i am pretty keen on having this thing absolutely by the books!

2) Emmisions gear.. with an RB30 block, and an RB25DE head, what emmissions gear do we need to fit? from what i can make out, it is pretty much only the charcoal cannister (and exhaust of course)

hopefully there is someone out there that can help us with a little bit of advise, i don't want to give up the RB30DET dream unless i really am forced to.

Kent

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52181-engineering-the-240k-with-rb30det/
Share on other sites

I am not familiar with the engineers laws but can say that not all ECU's are legal. A car must run in a closed loop.. but most aftermarket ecus run in open loop (did I get that right) so they wont pass emissions.

That said my mate put a ecu and new engine into a mighty boy and had no issues.

The RTA website has a shit load of intomation on it. I would start there..

Dont give up the dream dude..

Thanks carlo, something else to add to the ecu shopping list.. so far i have down

6 ignition outputs (don't want to run wasted spark)

6 injector drivers

closed loop

password protected

(at this stage it looks like the only one to match is EMS 8860, after the next software version to cover the 6 ign drivers)

from what i can work out, the powerfc can't be password protected, and can be therefore changed by the owner (through the powerfc)

hence why they wouldn't be accepted.. mind you i have also heard that some won't accept aftermarket ecu's even if they are password protected (and the owner has no clue what it is).. not sure if this is because they are lazy

Kent

powerfc can be password protected, from my understanding its done with the powerexcel software...dunno if the datalogit can do it, also i think theres someone else on these forums who has a rb30det and using the ap engineering r32 gtst power fc running that.

yea there are a few, but from all the bits i have already collected (wiring and sensors etc) it will just be easier to cut into an aftermarket ECU (i have to redo the wiring in the datsun anyway) than to convert everything to rb20det bits and pieces

no your not wasting my time at all!,

I looked into doing that, but seeing as we already have an rb25de engine and loom with the majority of sensors we will need, it seemed a lot simpler than having to work out what sensors needed to be found to get the rb20det loom up and running (besides the power fc for rb20det costs just as much as an aftermarket system anyways). i even went down the path of looking at buying an rb20det halfcut so we would have everything then we could sell parts off that we didn't use, but it just turned out to be too expensive.. and there are LOTS of other things to spend money on! (and the temptation to just throw the rb20det would be too great!)

it would be nice to get the rb20det powerfc working, i think it would just complicate things alot more for us (not something we really need with the little experience we have and the huge job ahead :rofl:)

the other option may be to try and hook up an rb25det powerfc, though i have no idea what i would need to do to get the r33 rb25de engine and loom to match.

did the r33 come without vvt (variable cam thingi) that might cause probs with the r33 ecu since the rb25de head didnt come with it??? or it did???

I dunno i've u've seen this.... think it was a fast fours which had done a rb25det from a r34 into a 240 if my memory serves me right......you seen that, could provide some help there..??..

good luck dude, should be a nice ride when complete!!!

I dunno i've u've seen this.... think it was a fast fours which had done a rb25det from a r34 into a 240 if my memory serves me right......you seen that, could provide some help there..??..

Hey guys, this prompted a memory of an old magazine I have, Feb/March 1997 ZOOM extreme performance magazine Volume 1 No.6. Article by Julian Edgar.

This issue has PART 3 of Project Skyline, An RB20DET into a C210 (~1979) Skyline Coupe. 7~8 pages on wiring up the engine!!.

Any other magazine horders out there , check your stash for other issues with this project. Probably started late in 1996.

I can drop it off at Kents if needed

Jim.

Wow, what a fantastic find! i would be especially gratefull if anyone has the section on installing the gearbox into that car (especially hooking up the speedo/tacho)

Jim, i will contact you and come up to yours to pick it up soon? anyone else if you have a copy, please scan it in and email it to me! kent@project240k.com

thanks!

Any further progress on the engineering?

I am in japan at the moment but have a similar project sitting at home in melbourne, waiting to hear whats legal before I purchase an ECU here. I will get a friend to do some anonymous phone calls to vicroads and any engineers but would like to hear what you guys find from the relevant authorities. I have search for months and the best available info is only heresay, very few people actually get in touch with the authorites and even less post info on a successfully engineered car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...