Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a problem with my GTR which a quick poll with some other GTR owners might help narrow down the answer.

My car is an August 89 R32 model, which is apparently running an ECU from the Feb 93 R32 (using PLMS and Nissan Data Scan).

My chassis number is around the BNR-002600 mark, but the Engine Number is in the low 37700 range (eg RB26 037700A).

I'd really like to know what car (r32, R33 R34) this particular motor is out of, so I can work out some funky wiring, ECU voltages, and the sensors I shoudl have vs do have. I've got detonation going, dead o2 sensors and and exhaust and AAC valves that lock up the scanning software. I need to get it working correctly, and to do that I need to know what my car is likely to be and what I can look for (comapre part numbers etc).

If you own a GTR, and you're pretty sure your engine is genuine, would like to hear your:

- Build date as YYMM (eg 9302)

- Approx Engine number (rounded up or down to the nearest 10 will do)

- Car series (r32, R33 etc)

This will help me narrow down when my engine was built, and in turn will help me make sure I buy the correct sensors for my car. I don't really want to bugger another set of turbines.

Unless of course anyone can reverse lookup an engine number and trace it back to a car?

Cheers, and TIA

John

Got any pictures of the engine bay ?

 

I'm sure the guys with the Nissan Fast software can help you out. :wavey:

No pictures handy. It's not a red cover, so not R34.

Nissan Fast doesn't cover Engine Numbers (AFAIK - I've got it).

Mine is similar, its a 92 build car but seems to have 94 R32 or R33 running gear in it. A quick possible check is, on the left hand side of the engine bay (looking at the car from front on) look down where the oil filter is. The early (pre 94 R32's) have alot of hydraulic lines and HICAS pump stuffed in there, whereas the 94 R32's and R33's dont (or so ive been told - they have an electronic hicas pump under the car).

I cant confirm the accuracy of this information, but it seems to fly as another genuine 1994 model I checked also didnt have the hicas pump and lines there, but an earlier 91 model did.

No pictures handy. It's not a red cover, so not R34.

Nissan Fast doesn't cover Engine Numbers (AFAIK - I've got it).

Have a look at the oil cap. If its star like shape its an R32 Engine if not its a R33.

Thats the only way i've been able to identify the R32 from R33 :) - easiest way.

:wavey:

:)

Jun

Thanks for your replies so far.

MY chassis is an R32 so the HICAS suff will be under the engine. Mind you something powers up under the car's rear when ignition is turned on (not fuel pump) so I might have a look tonight. An oil filler cap can be changed and isn't a reliable piece of information.

Still looking for solid information :

If you own a GTR, and you're pretty sure your engine is genuine, would like to hear your:

- Build date as YYMM (eg 9302)

- Approx Engine number (rounded up or down to the nearest 10 will do)

- Car series (r32, R33 etc)

This will help me narrow down the engine range. It could have been bare-blocked for all I know, so Engine Number to build date comparison is the only way to go

well i know 45400 is a 1994 so i worked out that 37700 is a 93

So you are saying that you have a 1994 R32, with an engine number around 45400. And the motor appears to be be genuine? What month/year of build? These dates are critical to narrowing down variants in sensors etc. A guess of 1993 doesn't help me (much) as there were at least two variants in 93

i have 1994 model BNR32 GTR, chassis no. bnr32-313761....

engine is BNR34 N1 so i cant help you with the engine vs chassis number comparisson.

One major difference between the two is that 93 onwards gtr's have a pull type clutch, 89-92 have a push type clutch. Just have a look on the drivers side of the bellhousing where the clutch for sits and you will know if you are running an early model driveline. From there it will be hard to know if the actual engine has been changed.

From what i have seen in the past, most japanse conversions to 33 series engine includes the driveline which includes the better rear diff (heavily finned) etc etc...something you could check.

Barring all that, just ring up any Nissan dealership and they will tell you what chassis the engine number will match.

TG

So you are saying that you have a 1994 R32, with an engine number around 45400. And the motor appears to be be genuine?   What month/year of build? These dates are critical to narrowing down variants in sensors etc.  A guess of 1993 doesn't help me (much) as there were at least two variants in 93

no i dont have a 94 gtr ,

we have a 95 ( may ) engine number 55xxx and a 97 ( feb ) eng number 63xxx and i know someone else has r33 95 ( march)51xxx and i know 45000 is a late r32 engine (94 ) but cant help you with a month .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...