Jump to content
SAU Community

Skylines Australia NSW Wakefield Park Trackday 1/11/04


Recommended Posts

Which one will allow me to sleep in the latest? Fed Hwy I guess. If so may I suggest meeting at that servo on the way out of town on the right hand side. The one near the roundabout with the killer speed strips.

Probably about the same. Fed Hwy will allow you to fill up in Goulburn. I think I now the servo your talking about. Near Clancys (or whatever its called). 7:00?

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Probably about the same. Fed Hwy will allow you to fill up in Goulburn. I think I now the servo your talking about. Near Clancys (or whatever its called). 7:00?

/me refers to whereis...

cnr of Antill st and Fed Hwy at Watson

I'm coming from Upper Downer so 7am there would be great.

Dino :D

Tosh/Dino,

Just a thanks for a great event. There were some weapons out there and it was great to get back out on the track again. I improved on last time so getting there, just need some descent suspension and tyres.

Thank again.

Glenn

Well what a top day that was! :uh-huh:

Times are up at www.racetime.com.au, click Results on the left.

Thanks to all who showed up and helped to make the day a success. :D

Brad and the guys at RENEW did a great job organising the day and hopefully this was the first of many events we will be running with them.

A special mention to Terry Ashwood for bringing the Gibson 31 down and also for all the driving pointers he gave.

Thanks also to Richard (mmmgtir) for coming down just to help out with the BBQ etc.

As far as I know there were no incidents and everyone drove home at the end of the day.

A very successful day.

:P

Yeah it was a very well run day guys. I was absolutley knackered on the drive home after having next to no sleep on sunday night, but arrived home safely. Got a bit sunburnt though! I was pissed that wakefield deemed a wakefield licence necessary to be a passenger (as mine had just expired and I don't want to waste another $40 on one) I would swear that it didn't used to be the case when I've had my friends ride with me around there. Those two twin yellow RX7s and the Gibson 'line were awesome... Breathtaking. I thought that there was a really good schedule for the day, so a good effort all 'round.

I will definately be driving at the next one :(

Richard

As above, had a great day big thanks to all who organised. Just spewing that I had to work and missed all the timed dry stuff in the morning. Though I did have a lot of fun drifting in the rain:burnout:

Oh and I'm sorry for the two stopages I caused late in the day:Oops:

At least I did maintain the Nissan pride by not needing a tow.

pretty cars, but gee there's some ugly heads in them :(

good to hear it went well guys, I can't beleive you had a wet track day without me :D

next time gadget!

And well done to the roundy roundy boys for organising with SAU, its great when we can work with other clubs :(




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...