Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday Folks, I attended the cruise and i can only say one thing, what an utter waste of police resources.... sending 5 cars and 6 officers out to Newton to try and defect as many cars as possible (yes they did say that :D ), for over 2 hours. I for one am shocked and amazed at the actions of these officers, and would encourage anyone who came on the cruise to complain in all appropriate channels:

The Police cars in attendance were:

XQD 555

XQD 093

XQD 363

XQE 377

WQX 371

The Officers at the scene were: (only managed to get 1 name, but all numbers)

1964 (did not reveal name when asked politely .... i thought this was legal requirement if asked??)

4690

7244

8812

1817

2159

And the channels for complaint:

SA Police:

[email protected]

Ph: 08 8207 5000

The Australian:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/secti...55ETEXT,00.html

The Advertiser:

http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/secti...s^^TEXT,00.html

The ABC:

http://www.abc.net.au/contact/

A Current Affair:

P.O. Box 9

North Adelaide SA 5006

Ph: (08) 8267 0298

http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/storyidea/story_ideas.asp

Today Tonight:

http://seven.com.au/todaytonight/contact_suggest

Again, Feel free to bombard the appropriate channels with complaints/suggestions.... practice your right to free speech!

This is also going up on Ausrotary, Toymods, and Nissansilvia.com, so feel free to put it up on any other forum you think of

Cheers

Robbo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52791-cruise-oct-8th/#findComment-1043286
Share on other sites

Yeah, its no good..... :D Lucky i wasn't driving... was with a mate in an r31 and another in a soarer, they didn't get done, but i saw numerous imports receive a defect and overheard one officer accuse the owner of a (from what i could see) stock r33 gtr of doing 'burnouts'.... even after he explained that it would be hard to do in a 4wd car :)

ridiculous, simply ridiculous and completely unjustified is all i can say... i really do hope a lot of people put in some complaints...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52791-cruise-oct-8th/#findComment-1043293
Share on other sites

yeah I didn't get done - the officer was quite polite to me and told me I had a really nice car :D

Total waste of resources though - I hope everyone writes an email to the approriate people - I know I will!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52791-cruise-oct-8th/#findComment-1043483
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...